Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

 

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    PM Lee’s Facebook chat draws flood of comments

    Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong taps on social media for the GE. (Screengrab from Facebook)Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong taps on social media for the GE. (Screengrab from Facebook)

    In an attempt to connect directly with young voters, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong on Wednesday evening logged on to social networking site Facebook to discuss issues pertaining to the General Election (GE) and the future of Singapore.

    At 8pm sharp, PM Lee kicked off his webchat with an informal self-introduction, including the use of Internet lingo. He posted on the People Action Party's (PAP's) official Facebook page: "Hi, I'm Lee Hsien Loong. Welcome to my webchat! This is my first time doing this. So please don't flame me, I'm a newbie :-) I see many of you are interested in how we can engage youths more. Shall we start with this?"

    He then touched on controversial issues such as the cost of living, housing, transport and foreign talent. He also sought to hear fresh ideas on how to make Singapore a better place. In just one hour, the online conversation drew over 5,000 comments, mostly from young concerned Singaporeans.

    He ended his one-hour Facebook session by saying: "This has been a most wide-ranging, fast-moving webchat. Thank you! Didn't manage to answer everything. I hope you found it as interesting as I did. We need to build our future together. Please come forward. Singapore is yours. Build it, change it, improve it, cherish it."

    According to PAP, the aim of the online event was to give voters a direct online interaction with the Prime Minister. This was the first time PM Lee leveraged on new media by hosting an online chat to bring himself closer to the netizens.

    Official data provided by Socialbakers.com reveal that Singapore has over 2.41 million Facebook users, and the 25-34 age group makes up the main demographic with a 32 percent share.

    PM Lee is not the only politician tapping on social media to connect directly with young voters.

    On Tuesday, George Yeo, Foreign Minister and PAP candidate for Aljunied group representation constituency (GRC), reached out to young Singaporean voters through a two-and-a-half minute video uploaded onto his Facebook page. He called for younger voters to allow him to be their "voice in government", and even admitted that many young Singaporeans "think that the government is arrogant and high-handed".

    Even before the General Election 2011, he had been well-known for actively sharing snippets about his personal life and work as a Minister with his 27,000 fans on Facebook.

    It appears that PAP has hired social media consultants to manage the party's online social campaigns and profiles. In a reply to a user in early April this year, PAP's official Twitter account posted: "We have mundane updates today because some 'Social Media experts' said our tonality was not appropriate yesterday."

    On the other side of the coin, 24-year-old Nicole Seah from the National Solidarity Party (NSP) has emerged as one of Singapore's most popular politicians on Facebook. In just two weeks, her Facebook page reaped over 70,000 "likes" at this point of writing.

    The Workers' Party has established a strong Facebook community, too, amassing over 30,000 "likes". As soon as the GE fever started a few weeks ago, the political party began using rich media such as photos and videos to boost user engagement. In addition, the party has taken advantage of the site's "event" feature by inviting its supporters to attend its rallies.

    Local social media analytic site 157.sg has done an in-depth analysis on the social media landscape of the elections, and found that there was a significant rise of Facebook popularity of candidates in opposition parties in the past week.

    However, the site noted that the total number of fans of both PAP and opposition parties' Facebook pages makes up only 11 percent of the total number of actual voters in Singapore.

    Follow Yahoo! News on Twitter and become a fan on Facebook.

    This article is published by Yahoo! Southeast Asia Pte. Ltd., 60 Anson Road #13-01 Mapletree Anson, Singapore, 079914.

     

    821 comments

    • Irene Tan  •  1 year 0 months ago
      Honourable Prime Minister.. Actually it is very simple....just bring down the cost of living in our homeland... all will be pacified. People are not interested in politics but their survival and comfort. Our children always come first in our concerns. Hopefully, one of these kids you are engaging through facebook can tell you like kid who told the emperor "but emperor you are not wearing any clothes!".

      I'm sure your mother or teacher would have told you the story of the "Emperor who did not wore clothes". Like you, he is advised by frauds on his vanity that the sufferings of his people were neglected. It only took one kid to tell him the truth.

      Like the people of that kingdom, we are upset on the future of our children. They too have to give way to foreigners. While you pay for them in our universities, we have to pay for our daughter in a private U and cannot subsidize with our CPF bcos it is a private U....soon their future and work prospects will be displaced by children of foreigners too. God Bless.
      • Holy Goat 1 year 0 months ago
        I doubt our children will come first. An extract from MyCarForum...

        ---
        though i am very against the influx of FTs, i still treat them like a fellow being and have never look at them with a different perspective.

        i was having lunch with a PRC colleague. shes a 24yr old gal who just graduated from NTU and now working in a MNC while waiting for PR approval.

        just started a casual topic like, wad do u like about this country and how are u coping so we get the standard reply. wad stuns me, was the answer to my next question.

        me: " so wad makes u decide to come here"

        PRC: " i didnt"

        me: " wa, ur parents force u here or ur bf is here"

        PRC: "neither, ur SG gahment invited us here"

        me: " huh, wad do u mean"

        PRC: " ur MOE went to our school in our village and told us they URGENTLY need students here, infact they were hardselling the whole scheme and many of us signed up"

        me: " huh, wad did they offer"

        PRC: " they offer us, ALL Expenses paid for our fees in NTU, including lodging and we even get pocket money"

        me: *mouth open

        PRC: "on top of that, they have send me the INVITATION letter to apply for PR after we grad"

        i seriously begin to wonder the magitude of the FT problem has many more sides that many of us do not know,

        i lose my pride as a sgporean after hearing this and i really wonder do they really care ?

        if u give a PR who starts a business here and bring jobs to sgporeans, by all means.

        BUT if u choose to so-call groom a FT and seemingly used up tax payers money to fund it, i totally do not understand the reason why.

        my guess is, they bring in more FTs, give them the candy and they bring in more FTs, which i belive is working because she told her friends about this scheme and many of her friends are here now, at the expenses of home-grown sgporeans.

        i myself was deprived the chance of studying in a local U.

        but yet a villager from a faraway land with no visible society contributions gets the chance of studying here, all expenses PAID.

        are we really worth this much to the gahment ? is it really we got not enough pple here to study in NTU ? then why are they rejecting sgporeans who meet the pre-requisites ?

        ---
    • Avery Mann  •  1 year 0 months ago
      Dear PM,

      If George Yeo is voted out of Aljunied, no problem. Didn't the PAP brag that many of the new candidates are good enough to be ministers? Appoint one of them as Foreign Minister. Put your new candidates to the test and prove to us that you are not lying. NO ONE is indispensible!
      • Maou 1 year 0 months ago
        Assuming that no one is indispensible, do we have to give up the best candidate and throw in the worst one for the job instead? Sorry don't see any logic here.
      • Ack C 1 year 0 months ago
        The best is AMK lost! New maid needed!
      • Hello 1 year 0 months ago
        Just came back from a WP rally, they said there is the Second Minister for Foreign Affair - Raymond Lim. So no problem.

        And the Speaker of Parliament need not be an elected MP.

        As for Lim Hwee Hwa, they did not mentioned. I think can get spare part from Borneo or KAH Motors. So no problem.

        I double confirmed that there is no free bus ride, drink or food. I even have to use my own money to buy WP party flag and Magazine which they put into a metal donation box.

        After listening to all the WP candidates for Aljunied GRC. I am very confident that I will have no regret supporting their cause come May 7th.

        My only worry now is come polling day, I need to make sure I write the "X" within the box I heard some mentioned that even a dot outside the box will deem the vote spoilt.

        BTW, they mentioned one or some TC has rubbish stacked 3 storey high, confirm not HTC. So which TC ? Was it in the News I missed ?
    • Singapore First!  •  1 year 0 months ago
      It should not be for PM alone to engage Singaporeans, but more so the MPs. MPs must be the voice of the people, not just the voice of the Government.
      Unfortunately, that seems to be the case mostly, because they are beholden to the party, to toe the party line.
      Hence, rather than voicing out their own personal opinions, they keep to the safe side and regurgitate whatever PM or the Ministers say. Hence they become Yes Men/Women.
      We need Bue Kia Si MPs to debate issues, stand up for Singaporeans, question policies, speak their minds etc.
      How many MPs really agree with/are convinced about Govt policies - have PM asked them?
      Do they reflect Singaporean's views or are they only keen to push the Govt's views - trying to convince the people instead of listening to them?
      • Angie 1 year 0 months ago
        His MPs did a disservice to him . . . . . . . . not giving him real feedbacks from the ground for so many years.
        However, most Singaporeans know of such practices, too: before the MP touched grounds to meet the constituents, all the grassroots helpers would have the cleaners spruce up the whole place. The MPs never see the actual real ground situations, because they would be seeing the touched-up. Therefore, only the residents could see rats running around, uncleared rubbish (but MPs will never see such things).
        As information got filtered upwards, what the PM got was "everything had been fine, without blemish". Therefore, PM will never know the true ground situation.
        Who's fault? Both. The leader should not accept nor condone glossed over facts. If he wants apple-polishers only, then he won't get all the facts.
      • PPO 1 year 0 months ago
        well said, i would prefer all Minister with hearts, go round spore with surprise checks and not pre arrange .....................things ahd been covered up.

        do it like other govern bodies been doing, surpries spot checks.....................................even check on those public sectors too............ask the man on the ground how they really feel and not all pre arrange interviewers, who had been given the question and answers...............
      • Hunt Seng 1 year 0 months ago
        They just want to hear what they want to hear.
    • Mer Deka  •  1 year 0 months ago
      “WE ARE SINGAPOREANS” QUIZ

      In what way is Singapore “UNIQUELY Singapore”?

      ANS (double confirm):
      It is the only “democracy” in the world where the ruling party THREATENS the voters that they will REGRET, REPENT, and will be PENALISED (NO lift upgrading, NO emergency lift services) if they don’t vote for the their party (PAP)
      • bite me 1 year 0 months ago
        uniquely singapore
      • ZZZ 1 year 0 months ago
        Was @ The WP Rally In UBI Ave 1, LTK said Repent is when you do something wrong and sinful...
      • JollyGood 1 year 0 months ago
        Please note that they have change it to "YOUR SINGAPORE" slogan!!!
    • A Yahoo! User  •  1 year 0 months ago
      I think he's realize it somehow and trying to reach out to us, the younger generation......anyway....having said that...i think yes its a little too late for that.........but thanks for the effort PM......but still...changes have to be made....and its good to have new blood in Parliament for a change.....new blood meaning...new and more opposition party MPs arguing and debating policies made for Singapore.....now that's real democracy.............
      • Mr 1 year 0 months ago
        We are in the final stretch people. Do not falter now, go for it. Opposition for the win!!!
      • Calvin Yong 1 year 0 months ago
        Democracy for sake of it. So you would prefer India, Philippines, Thailand, Taiwan and etc where the West can influence them to slow down their economy for decades. Its not so simplicitic that a system can do better w opposition parties?? Why the West are so hard on, on this topic is because of their history. They fear the rise of the Third Reich, Nazi Germany and etc... But is Singapore near that being so small and open - and with govt so Pro its people???
      • low 1 year 0 months ago
        Arguing and debating policies sounds good on paper. Chiam and Low and Sylvia have been in Parliament for so long. I have seldom seen them arguing, debating policies in any determined, dogged, intelligent manner, with workable suggestions, in Parliament debates. They are either quiet, or just throwing stones hoping one of them would hit a jackpot. Vote for more oppi and get more quiet clowns in?
    • Runners fall in Rodriguez  •  1 year 0 months ago
      Should I sack my current maid?

      I need your urgent advice about employing a maid. As a busy mother, I
      need someone reliable to help out at home.

      My maid is from Profits Agency Pte (PAP) and she has worked for me for a
      long time. Her mother worked for my parents and did an excellent job, so
      I had faith in her. For several years her performance has been very
      good, but recently she has become arrogant and insensitive, and is
      making lots of mistakes.

      For example:
      1) She flooded my kitchen - she told me that the drain pipe has
      blocked (she was supposed to clear it once a month but didn't). Then she
      assured me that it is very rare (once in 50 yrs) and won't happen again
      in the near future. Guess what? It flooded again within a year!

      2) She didn't close a window and my terrier dog escaped. I was so
      worried cos he is dangerous and could bite lots of people. After the
      incident, she didn't apologise and just shrugged her shoulders saying
      "What to do, it has happened." Fortunately my neighbor found the dog and
      we locked it up again.

      3) Without consulting me, she has been bringing in strangers for
      my house's maintenance work. She says they charge low wages and keep
      costs down, but they eat my food, make a lot of noise and rest on my
      bed. I think they even tried to seduce my husband. It stopped feeling
      like my home, more like a cheap hotel, and I don't always want to come
      back at the end of the day.

      4) When she first came to work for me, I instructed her to clean
      the different parts of the house at least once a week. But for some time
      she has stopped taking care of the bedrooms of PP and H; they are now
      dirty and messy. I asked why and she told me that the kids had been
      disobedient, so she was neglecting their bedrooms as a punishment (she
      has forgotten that she is paid to clean all the rooms).

      Even though my maid has worked for me for many years and I value what
      she has done in the past, I think she is now getting complacent. Her
      attitude is imperious and dismissive. She ignores my comments and
      basically treats my feedback as "noise".

      I wrote to the agency about her behavior; they assured me that they are the best agency around and all their maids are "Committed to Serve" - but I think it is just rhetoric and I don't see that in her actions. Her salary is much higher than maids in other countries, but the agency say this is to keep her
      honest and stop her moving to another employer. They say there is a limited supply of maids, and isn't big enough for more than one good maid agency, so I should not trust their competitors.

      I have to decide whether to renew my maid's 5-year employment contract.
      When we discussed this she said that she is now part of a team, and if I
      want her I must also accept her friends doing part-time work for me. One
      friend is very inexperienced, can't do basic tasks or explain what she
      intends to do. I suspect that she is actually underage. When
      interviewed, she only seemed interested in her days-off and visiting
      Universal Studios. When she couldn't answer my questions she stomped her
      foot and exclaimed, "I don't know what to say!" But I am still expected
      to pay her a high salary.

      Now there happens to be a few other maid agencies - Workhard Pte (WP),
      New Solutions Pte (NSP), Super Personnel Pte (SPP) and Star Domestica
      Pte (SDP) - that offered me some helpers who seem sincere, genuine and
      intelligent. They are keen to work, willing to assist me and have a good
      attitude. I know that they may take a bit of time to learn how
      everything works, but frankly I am inclined to give them a chance.

      People say that the devil you know is better than one you don't. But I
      feel that I can't tahan my current maid anymore. Do you think I should
      sack my current maid and try out a new one?
    • hasil  •  1 year 0 months ago
      I believe the chat is mainly criticising the PAP regime rather than well wishes. The young people should not waste their time with a monopolistic regime to satisfy their needs. They should vote for political pluralism into parliament to fight for their needs.
    • veraCITY  •  1 year 0 months ago
      PM LHL: I've seen your mid-day speech, now you try social networking media to reach out directly to Singaporean. Don't you think those ministers surrounding you ought to get spanked since you are the only one working ?
    • A Yahoo! User  •  1 year 0 months ago
      Why so these last min work...?
      I remember last time during presidential election, our media will show how friendly our dearest president come out from his white house and join the public for a jog in a park...Now where is he?

      Are all these for a show only before election? I do not know..
      But i will not be soft hearted when it comes to think of a brighter future for my next generation.
      As i am already suffering now, if i make mistake just becoz that i think they have change...I believe that i will really repent for the next 5 years.
    • Rotten Papaya  •  1 year 0 months ago
      Some Singaporeans cannot believe that PAP’s FT, immigration, bread & butter, CPF policies are DELIBERATE. We desperately want to believe that the gahmen will look after its citizens.

      Do not be fooled. PAP still believe they did a great job. Hear the PM's words, “…the government has been right more often than wrong. For instance, the intake of foreign workers contributed to the Republic’s 14.5 per cent economic growth last year, and subsequently led to the budget surplus and Grow & Share package.” Hear carefully Singaporeans. PM said that Singapore's 14.5 per cent growth and the Grow & Share monies they gave us are because of the foreign intake. Please wake up Singaporeans!

      To PAP, the foreign intake is NOT a mistake, it is a success. They have repeatedly said that “this is something they have to do.” Their strate---- is PRECISELY to turn Singapore into a paradise and playground for the Rich & Powerful.

      No miscalculations, they know that in the process, they will inevitably create 4 tiers of citizens. The First-class who will have it all and be served by the other 3 tiers who are urged to keep becoming “better, faster, cheaper”. They bring in “hungrier” FTs precisely so that Singaporeans have no choice but to either be “hungrier” (read "subservient") or be replaced. They said that wages have to be depressed to “remain competitive”. On the other hand, Ministers must be paid well (because Ministers belong to the First-class group).

      So, they are right. PAP did not make mistake. They set out precisely to carry out their economic & social strategies and succeeded. Only thing, PAP's strategies are different from Singaporeans’ expectations. Which Singaporean will ever dream that the gahmen’s strategies will turn us into 2nd, 3rd, even 4th class citizens. They also did not explain clearly or consult with citizens. How can they? Which citizen will ever agree to such a strate---- ???

      So, with unchecked, absolute POWERS, they change and go ahead with policies, laws, anything and everything without even needing to explain to Singaporeans.

      It is our own fault that we place ourselves totally at the mercy of PAP. Even right now, a lot of Singaporeans are literally begging the gahmen, begging PAP “to listen more”. Listen what? PAP executed their strategies well and achieved exactly what theyset out to achieve. Will they change? Of course not! This is their CHOSEN STRATE----.

      Please wake up Singaporeans, and don’t be the laughing stock of FTs as well as the world. The only way to stop them now, is to break their two-thirds majority in Parliament. It is this Unchecked Powers which allows them to pass policies and laws without even needing to inform, let along consult, Singaporeans.

      On May 7, if we do not seize the final opportunity, there will be no more hope for ALL Singaporeans!
    • Mer Deka  •  1 year 0 months ago
      “WE ARE SINGAPOREANS” QUIZ

      In what way is Singapore “UNIQUELY Singapore”?

      ANS (double confirm):

      It is the only country in the world that has 2 categories of senior citizens.

      1. PAP senior citizens, i.e. MM, SM whose value goes UP the older they get. (Pay keeps on rising, iron rice bowl)
      2. Ordinary Singaporean senior citizens, i.e. everyone else whose value DROPS (Lower pay, lower CPF, unemployment) when they reach 55.
    • Sam  •  1 year 0 months ago
      A posting from Hui Er in The Straits Times.

      Please allow me to give my take on housing policies in this nation.

      I feel very strongly against our housing policies in its present form.

      This is because it does nothing except push prices up and it appears more to be a major source of revenue for the government.

      For years, our policy makers have been advocating home ownership here.

      I have no issue with that. Indeed, families should be encouraged to buy a home, be it HDB or private.

      However, our policies, as it stands now, do not just appear to be encouraging home ownership. It is encouraging the people to go for multiple home ownership.

      Over the years, this kind of home ownership programme has mothed into prices that have become unsustainable.

      If we take away the thousands of foreigners who have poured in the millions, you will understand what I mean by property prices being at unsustainable levels.

      If one is to look at it from another perspective, our present housing policy can be seen as one that wants its people to place that Big Bet. A bet that many Singaporeans can ill afford.

      As in any investments, there are risks involved.

      There have been three recessions in the last 12-13 years (correct me if I am wrong). Many jobs were lost.

      There is still a lot of uncertainty in the global market.

      What makes this government think Singaporeans would want to make such a big bet on property? And if their investments go wrong, who do you think will be the biggest loser?

      Will it be the people, or the government?
    • c  •  1 year 0 months ago
      Mr Prime Minister

      You are a great man. But some of your colleagues are sincerely not up to par, especially MBT. And to nomnate Sim Ann and Kate Spate girl is simply suicidal cause they cant be trusted. I can see thru their faces.
    • Lee  •  1 year 0 months ago
      If PAP is really showing concern, it should act 5 year ago and not now where polling day is just 2 day away to win vote!!!
    • WhatTheFish  •  1 year 0 months ago
      First they came for the communists,
      and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a communist.

      Then they came for the trade unionists,
      and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist.

      Then they came for the Jews,
      and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Jew.

      Then they came for me
      and there was no one left to speak out for me.

      - Pastor Martin Niemöller (1892–1984)

      Vote for change else Singaporeans will become the minority in their own country!
    • Madman  •  1 year 0 months ago
      I received a PAP pamphlet the size of a mini magazine in my mail. Inside,the first 3 pages make sense. The rest is just propaganda. Singaporeans has already said that we do not want so many foreigners in Singapore, we have nothing against foreigners but tiny Singapore simply cannot sustain so many people and is becoming very uncomfortable for everyone. All they can say is they will SLOW the influx and ensure that new immigrants can speak SOME English. This makes me so angry because we need to stop or even reduce the number of foreigners not SLOW the influx. Also, what the F had they been doing in the past letting in millions of people who speak no English? They only realise that we have Malays and Indians in Singapore whose mother tongue is not Chinese and cannot speak Chinese during election time. Do LHL have any F'king commonsense? My Singapore born Indian/Malay friends who serve NS have problem shopping in the supermarket, they have problem asking the SMRT/SBS staff for directions, and they have problems finding a jobs because employers want Chinese speaking staff to cater to mainland Chinese customers and colleagues. They are IN THEIR OWN COUNTRY. Singapore is becoming so uncomfortable and terrible for child rearing that our fertility will drop further, which is ironic as immigration is supposed to help us handle low fertility. Moreover, by letting in so many people at the same time, we are just planting a demographic time bomb as these new immigrants will also have low fertility once they settled in an affluence nation and 5 millions of us grow old together! Then how, import 20 million people? Who would come then? USELESS PAP GETTING MORE STUPID AND SHORT SIGHTED BY THE DAY.
    • ♫ ♥ Elis ♥ ♫  •  1 year 0 months ago
      I won't be surprise to see him crying infront of the crowd tomorrow. They will do whatever necessary to win and to retain their foothold at parliament. "Sorry" mean nothing to him at all. Only those foolish one who still do not learn their lesson will choose to give him another chance.
      Too bad ... his simple trick does'nt works on me.
    • faster  •  1 year 0 months ago
      If PM thinks that they made mistakes along the way, shouldn't he see that some of his MPs really should go?
      If its for the greater good of Singapore and if he really cares, why is he so worried?
      Oppositions are there to work with him, to speak for us, offer alternatives and new perspectives, so it's good for him.

      Btw, I think every PM & MP should play Sid Meier's Civilization, good to go back to basics and learn how to balance growth, power, wealth and happiness.
    • Kengkim  •  1 year 0 months ago
      Dear Prime Minister,I knew you tried very hard...your colieague may not....so sorry after so so much effoert be sincere or just an act,we are so sorry.....you can try,just like many citizen do,buy TOTO...
    • Yi Qing  •  1 year 0 months ago
      I only want to say... To err is human, mistakes done cannot be undone.. I personally think that harping on the mistake is not that important... PAP is not bad, Just that... other than thinking of GDP growth and such, please also take into consideration our psychological well-being.. I remember seeing a comment: "We have to pinch ourselves at times to remind ourselves (Singaporeans) that yes, We are in SINGAPORE !" Too many foreigners "invading" us. Quantity increasing every other day...

      I sincerely hope that no matter who is elected, PLEASE STOP IMPORTING ALL THE FOREIGN "TALENTS" who apparently are NOT TALENTS ! I don't and cannot SEE WHAT TALENT THEY HAVE ! "UNLESS speaking Cheena Mandarin or Fino English is considered a TALENT to Singapore"

      Dearest, ministers, I implore you all to stop allowing work permits, student visa to FOREIGNERS ! Especially the PRC and FILIPINO... They should be deported back to their country. They DON'T belong HERE ! Don't tell us that Singaporeans are also immigrants.. Over the years, We are now UNIQUE, We are SINGAPOREANS.

    Featured Blog Posts

    Blog Authors / Profiles