Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

 

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    SingaporeScene

    Andrew Kuan eyes second presidential bid

    Andrew Kuan seeks a second try at the Presidency. (Property images photo)Andrew Kuan seeks a second try at the Presidency. (Property images photo)

    In spite of a failed attempt six years ago, former JTC Corporation group chief financial officer Andrew Kuan is eyeing another shot at the presidency.

    The 57-year-old will be collecting the forms to apply for an eligibility certificate on his "own time and own schedule" sometime in July, reported The Straits Times.

    In 2005, the Presidential Elections Committee did not issue him an eligibility certificate because the seniority and responsibility of his JTC position did not match the eligibility criteria in the Constitution.

    One of the ways of to qualify is to have been either chairman or chief executive officer of key statutory boards for at least three years. Kuan worked in the statutory board from June 2001 to July 2004.

    Kuan now plans to highlight two points in hopes of getting the committee's approval to contest, reported ST.

    First, he pointed to a clause in the JTC Act outlining the duties of a CFO, which would qualify him under a criterion in the Constitution.

    The Act stated, the CFO will "prepare the financial statements in respect of each preceding financial year and submit them to the Corporation's auditor who shall audit and report on them to the Minister and the President".

    Kuan believes this would qualify him under the criterion that states, anyone with a "similar or comparable position of seniority and responsibility in any other organisation or department of equivalent size or complexity in the public or private sector" could be deemed eligible by the PEC.

    Kuan also wants to submit a copy of the cover letter of JTC's appraisal of his work from April 2003 to March 2004, which said he "exceeded expectations" in his performance.

    Kuan has uploaded a copy of his appraisal letter on his website. (Screenshot from Andrew Kuan's website)Kuan has uploaded a copy of his appraisal letter on his website. (Screenshot from Andrew …

    The paper reported, Kuan said he did not submit his appraisal in 2005 because he did not know JTC would send an assessment of his work to the committee then.

    In 2005, JTC held a press conference to say Kuan was asked to leave the statutory board because his performance was not satisfactory.

    Kuan, a People's Action Party member for more than 10 years until he left in 2005, runs his own business consultancy. He earlier indicated interest in contesting in the General Election but backed out to avoid a three-cornered fight with the Workers' Party.

    So far, Presidential hopefuls Dr Tony Tan and Tan Kin Lian have submitted their eligibility forms. Dr Tan Cheng Bock has yet to do so.

     

    163 comments

    • Christina  •  10 months ago
      I've been wondering, what can a president do for us?
      Do we have to pay such a big salary just to tell the world we have a president?
      Where his executive power is limited and leadership skill cannot be felt by the common people like us?
      • Anonymous 10 months ago
        Yu are wrong. For commom ppl like us, your baby get kissed by the president. Ha ha
      • Khy 10 months ago
        The president doesn't deserve that kind of pay. But he is not the one that decides how much he gets. His pay is decided by...
      • Ma Bao san 10 months ago
        President very busy leh.... he always need to cut ribbon, smile to ppl until face numb, play golf in the Istana.
    • love  •  10 months ago
      $4 million a year salary around $900 a day. Is it worth to pay a president for the role? Well unless what Tony Tan said he takes up for interest to serve the citizen and donate the salary to the needy.
    • Richard  •  10 months ago
      Andrew sir,

      Are you there for the salary or to serve? Boring job you know.
      • TWMA 10 months ago
        4m easy jop..... la
      • Boo 10 months ago
        Nobody will mind that boring job la. For the sake of $4.2m many wanted to apply leh but dare not because they are not yes men of the Papayas.
      • Be Honest 10 months ago
        Well I dont mind to be a 'Yes' man, do nothing and collect $4m...
    • Paul Tan  •  10 months ago
      I should say Singaporeans should be given a say in the PE. There should be a Fourth Options.Option (1) Tan Kin Lian. (2) Tony Tan (3) Tan Cheng Bock (4) Do not want a President.
      • Jiangjuajee 10 months ago
        Totally agree.
      • A Yahoo! User 10 months ago
        u wrong, tan ah beng is the 4th option!!
      • Leo 10 months ago
        I am writing Big Big on my election card for this coming PE :

        NO PRESIDENT NEEDED
    • PA  •  10 months ago
      This people elected president is really a joke... With so many criteria to meet... There is just a few people qualified... In another word, the governement has already pre-elected few people for the president.. So what people elected president are we talking about?? ...
      • Alamak! 10 months ago
        You overlook this formula:

        People elect the government
        Government elect the President
        Therefore People elect the President
      • To Be Fair 10 months ago
        Actually I think the pool is rather large - there are lots of well-qualified folk out there who have the brains and background to serve even with such strict criteria. I suspect a lot of folks do NOT want to be President as it is a very public position and although $4M sounds huge, to that category of folk it may not be so compared to their private sector earnings (esp versus having to give up their private lives). Thus I respect most of the candidates for stepping up to the plate - what we need to do is determine the candidates' abilities as well as motives, if it comes to that
    • KURO  •  10 months ago
      4 millions dollars hot seat to be contest in august 2011
      those RICH ppl only eligible
      the poor have to pay contestant's salary
      what the BIG joke of the day.
    • joanne  •  10 months ago
      Mr. Kuan, why don't you form a political party to fight for the interest of Singaporeans than to apply for the flower vase role of a president?
    • Devil at Work  •  10 months ago
      can we vote not to have a President and save taxpayer $4M a year ????????????/
    • princes_sg  •  10 months ago
      There should be a presidential debate between all eligible candidates on live tv the way the US did during its presidential campaign instead of each just sitting down in front of the camera, with their brylcreamed hair, reading a speech the way each sgp political party did during GE 2011.
    • Mickey Mouse  •  10 months ago
      Kuan put yourself to better use. Join one of the Political Party and serve the Singaporean. We need honest people like those Elected Worker's Party Parlamentarians.
    • Frank  •  10 months ago
      another one who just do it for the sake of limelight......
    • Rose  •  10 months ago
      Andrew, dun waste the time.
      Firstly, you won;t get the certificate of eligibity. 6 years ago cannot , why make you think you can get it now. For the sake of $4M....
      Secondly, even if you did. You won't get the minimum votes. Deposit confisicated.
      I dun mind your desposit being confiscated but since it dun land in my pocket. I just cannot stand you!!! You are so silent for the past 6 years and suddenly popped out again. What a donkey.

      In fact I dun like all the candidates. All have PAP background.
      Problem lies with who I dislike the least......

      I dun see any of these Presidential candidate can make any difference to the current situation.
      Looked like only benefit I can reap is an extra holiday.

      Guess I won't go down to voting station to vote so that I can highest return = 1 full day holiday.

      Give me a thumb up if you share the same sentiment as me !!!!
    • Citizen Unhappy  •  10 months ago
      WHY??? PAP brings in 2 mil foreign trashs that used public transport!!!
      .
      1)BUSES overcrowded during peak hours!!
      2)PAID FULL FARE on MRT and all they do is TAKE OUT THE SEATs so you can STAND !!!!
      .WHY NOT VOTE FOR PAP TO ABSORB THE "SMALL" INCREASE with MP"s paycut!!! i am very sure MANY MPs will not be in favour!!
      singaporean are also very happy to pass the extra electric and water cost to our MPs as well
      if that is TOO MUCH all former MPs pension for the better of SINGAPOREANs
      as pension are DOUBLE STANDARDs that average singaporean do not get!!!
      .
      WE MUST STAND UNITED TO BE HEARD!
      no need to be like EXYPT or TUNIXA, no violence need
      let PAP's foreign trashs and pest residents fill the stands
      .
      if you love singapore...please consider this action
      BOYCOTT
      1) ISTANA this NDP as NATHAN IS NOT PEOPLE"s PRESIDENT
      2) all NDP events organised by PAP ( spend time at home or at the beach with your family instead )
      3) vote NO to having another PAP ELECTED PRESIDENT if they cannot bring down the requirements for more to qualify
      .
      singaporeans , lets take back what belongs to us ! our pride and dignity !
    • Matthew Clown  •  10 months ago
      My collegues and friends share one common thought about you. You should be honoured..... becuase we felt that you got the face that needs a slap.
    • Dio  •  10 months ago
      If you failed to meet the criteria in the first attempt than you should not try it again because the election committee will stick to their gun and reject it for the second time.If they were to accept your application now is like slapping their own faces.You should just move on Mr.Kuan.
    • A Yahoo! User  •  10 months ago
      Dear Mr Andrew Kuan,

      Please don't join in the fray. A four-cornered fight will only help to increase Dr Tony Tan's chance.
      You won't have my vote!
    • richard  •  10 months ago
      Mr Kuan, don't watse your times and our times. You are going to loose your deposit and your face as well.
    • Mystery  •  10 months ago
      i dont see there is any different between having a President in Singapore or not any...
    • dementorz  •  10 months ago
      Mr Kuan,
      I was in one of your teaching classes during the PSB-IPT time.
      You are a very ambitious man.
      I still remember these words from you....
      You said, "What happens after Mr Lee Kuan Yew?" and your answer was " just take a look at what comes after Lee...which is Kuan..your last name..."

      You were a good lecturer but I wouldn't say the same about your personality.
      You can convinced us of your knowledge but you wont win the hearts of Singaporeans.
      I do not know your agenda for this PE, but the President is not about power.
      The President is more Singapore than all Singaporeans.

      Good luck anyway...
    • BengTeck  •  10 months ago
      Andrew Kuan,

      You are wasting your time, you may have your deposit forfeited >>>

    Featured Blog Posts

    Blog Authors / Profiles