Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

 

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    SingaporeScene

    Does it matter who becomes President of Singapore?

    President Nathan has decided not to run for a third term. (Reuters)President Nathan has decided not to run for a third term. (Reuters)

    By Andrew Loh

    Now that President SR Nathan has confirmed he will not be seeking a third term in office, the presidential race looks like it will be fought between three former People's Action Party (PAP) members. The presidential hopefuls are: Dr Tan Cheng Bock, former PAP Member of Parliament (MP); Dr Tony Tan, former Deputy Prime Minister; and Mr Tan Kin Lian, former chief executive officer of NTUC Income.

    All three have been quick to pledge independence from their former party, when they announced their intentions to seek the office of the Elected President. Dr Tony Tan, especially, having been a minister who held several portfolios including that of Deputy Prime Minister and several years more as deputy chairman and executive director of the Government Investment Corporation of Singapore (GIC), will have to show how his previous positions will not be a factor in exercising independent thought and decisions if he were president.

    The elected president's role in protecting Singapore's massive reserves is one of his key and most important responsibilities in safeguarding Singapore's future. The government's reluctance to divulge more information about the reserves has made the president's role even more critical. The GIC and its sister investment arm of the government, Temasek Holdings, have been criticised regularly for being non-transparent, despite defence of them by government ministers.

    As far back as 2008, then Minister of State for Finance, Mrs Lim Hwee Hua, said in response to a question at a forum with Young NTUC members:

    "You asked how much reserves we have. I'm sorry — I am not able to give you that answer. There are many, many people who are interested in how much we have. It has nothing to do with not wanting Singaporeans to know. It's only if we go public with you, a lot of other people will know." - Minister of State for Finance Lim Hwee Hua, Channel NewsAsia, March 15 2008.

    In 2009, she again rejected calls for more information on the government's investments.

    "We have to ask ourselves if transparency is an end in itself, or if it is the means to an end… If all our cards are revealed in pursuit of complete transparency, does that serve the purpose of having Temasek and the Government of Singapore Investment Corporation manage the reserves well?" (Today)

    Questions about the reserves

    So, what can the president do if the government refuses to provide details of its investments or of the reserves themselves?

    Singapore's late President Ong Teng Cheong, who was the first elected president of the country, had sought to know and understand where the government had parked its investments, but he was told that it would take "56 man-years" for the government to compile a listing.

    His successor, the current incumbent, has been in office for two 6-year terms but has not raised as many questions about the reserves as President Ong.

    In 2009, President Nathan consented to the government's request to make a drawdown of some "S$1.1 billion for FY 2008 and S$3.8 billion for FY 2009." (NLB) These were to fund the Jobs Credit scheme and the Special Risk-Sharing Initiative which the government wanted to implement to help Singapore through the financial crisis. The president's consent is required by law before such withdrawal is allowed.

    The three candidates who are seeking Singaporeans' mandate to assume the presidential post have made their independence the central plank on which they will campaign. But all three having been PAP men have raised questions about how much they will or are willing to probe the government on the matter of the reserves.

    Interestingly, in a Yahoo! poll, it is Dr Tony Tan — the former deputy chairman and executive director of the GIC — who emerged as the favourite among readers for the president's job. At 48 percent, he is far ahead of Dr Tan Cheng Bock and Mr Tan, who polled 16 percent and 18 percent respectively.

    Dr Tony Tan, when asked about the GIC's disclosure of information, said: "It is the Government's prerogative, not GIC's prerogative, to reveal details of the GIC portfolio. This is in the same way a bank will not disclose details of your bank account and transactions without your permission."

    The GIC has only one client — the Singapore Government.

    Examining the role of the President

    The question some have is thus: If it is only the government which has the prerogative to reveal details of GIC's investments, where does the president come in? What is the president able to do?

    While the president is given the audited annual accounts of GIC and Temasek Holdings, he does not issue any public statements on these, on whether he is satisfied with the information he is given, or any concerns he may have about the investments or the state of the reserves. Indeed, he presumably does not have the authority to question the investments, given that the two wealth management entities do not answer to the president but to the Ministry of Finance.

    Mr Tan, in a statement on the president's role vis a vis the reserves, which is partly made up of CPF contributions from ordinary Singaporeans, suggested "that the Elected President Office should produce an annual report showing the reserves of Singapore." Such a report, he says, "should also show the obligation of the Government and should include the balances held by the people held in the Central Provident Fund and also the bonds and guarantees issued by the Government."

    Such a move for the president to issue his own statement on the reserves will most probably be dismissed by the government, and it is unclear if the president has the authority for such an undertaking. While a presidential statement on the reserves would be welcomed by the public, it would, given the government's stance on secrecy as expressed by Mrs Lim previously, be of great concern to the government for reasons Mrs Lim has stated.

    It would thus seem that the matter of the president's role and responsibility regarding the reserves will continue to be an issue, no matter who eventually assumes the office at the Istana as Singapore's seventh president.

    What could give rest to Singaporeans' concern is for the government and the two wealth management funds to be more open and forthcoming about the state of the reserves and their investments.

    Short of these, the president's role will always be in question, no matter who holds the highest office in the land.

    Andrew is the co-founder of a socio-political website and writes frequently on issues which are close to his heart, particularly those affecting the less fortunate and on Singapore politics.

    Follow Yahoo! News on Twitter and become a fan on Facebook.

     

    351 comments

    • NV  •  10 months ago
      There is a compelling reason why the government is putting up Tony Tan for the elected presidency. As I have pointed out in my earlier posting, empowering the elected president with custodian and veto powers was intended by LKY as a mechanism to pre-empt and block future governments (not formed by PAP) from spending the nation’s reserves not accumulated by the government of the day.

      The gains made by the opposition were both a shock and a wake up call for the ruling PAP government. LKY and key party members of PAP know full well what this means and are pushing ahead to prepare for a worst case scenario in the next GE. Although he may have left the scene, LKY once said "even if I'm dead and they are lowering my coffin into my grave,
      I'll still get up if I sense something is wrong." I recall this was said in one of his National Day rally speeches.

      Those who know our ex-MM know that he is not one to mince his words. So by that Singaporeans can be sure that he has a hand in Tony Tan's stepping forward for the elected presidency. You can bet that the government will do everything to ensure Tony Tan’s passage into the elected presidency. To the government, Tony Tan is their ace card to play out the constitutional provisions of the President in full “in times of great crisis”? These were Tony Tan’s words when he was first asked about his intentions some 6 weeks’ ago.

      The timing seems to fit into the large scheme of things. Once elected, Tony Tan will be the seventh elected President of Singapore. He will settle into the presidency comfortably without much upheaval for the next 5 years. But when GE2016 comes around, that is when the elected President is expected to be on high alert and ready to play out his custodian and veto power role should the election throw up a "freak outcome" (LKY’s words).

      Unless and until that happens, the answer to writer Andrew Loh’s question is still “No, for now it does not matter who becomes the President of Singapore.”
      • gambir 10 months ago
        well said , fully agree with you ! but the only way is when the PAP toppled , the next govt in power , can always change the constitution and the power of the prresident .. There goes to say that the EP cannot serve it purpose in time of crisis !
      • sri 10 months ago
        I agree too...if you study the game and the play role, this is exactly how it going to be...So far the best President are Wee Kim Wee and Ong Teng Chong...when OTC step down it is obvious PAP play and arrange their card well.Everything will change if next gov in power...tired of all these......
      • Nick C 10 months ago
        Honestly, I am at a point where I want my dear country back & our rights as citizens with much better terms like that of UK, Europe (1st world benefits).

        I am not too particular who is the next President & hopefully Dr Tony Tan will do the job if he is going to be elected. Otherwise I don't think we will mince our words either. I would like our govt to work collectively to solve the numerous livelihood problems Singaporeans are facing right now.... :)
    • Richard  •  10 months ago
      The Elected President has a Council of Presidential Advisers (CPA) that he consults before he vetoes budgets of government or appointments to key post.

      Why not have the CPA report to the Prime Minister and keep the President a figure head?

      No need to show that the government is transparent because after over 40 years in power, the citizens has come to expect the expected outcomes.

      This will save the country over $5million a year on the President's salary plus the supporting cast.
      • Yip 10 months ago
        I LIKE WHAT YOU SAY BUT WISH TO ADD AN EXTENSION TO YOUR SUGGESTION ON COST-SAVINGS BY RECOMMENDIN ELIMINATING THE PRESIDENT TOO.

        IF A "FIGURE HEAD" IS EVEN NECESSARY, AS YOU SUGGEST, THEN INCLUDE ONE LITERALLY IN THE FORM OF A MERLION, AT A ONE TIME LOW COST, IF IT IS CAST IN BRONZE. THIS MERLION WILL SPOUT THE OBVIOUS ALL THE TIME, LIKE WHAT PRESIDENTS DO MOSTLY, BUT THIS TIME IT'S WATER THAT' COMES OUT OF THE MOUTH.
      • Benjamin 10 months ago
        Oh boy. You guys are humorous.

        Make it out of Bronze. I'd agree with that. It'll stand the test of time so that we don't need to elect a new figurehead, and at the same time it will sprout water instead of the nonsense that we have been receiving so far. Water > Nonsense.
      • Galac-Tikus 10 months ago
        At least we can be proud of having the most expensive prata seller in the world!!!! I hope Guiness will recognize it
    • Phillip Ang  •  10 months ago
      Nathan earns $11000 per day for photo shoots and playing the role of a puppet. this amount excludes annual leave and that is if he works 365 days. which is definitely not the case so he is paid much more. not including pension, other costs etc
      This is such a ridiculous situation which PAP still cannot see???
      • Eng 10 months ago
        PIP , to rub salt to your wounds, Nathan will be paid $6,857 EVERYDAY as long as he is alive.This is PENSION for life, thanks to S'POREANS.
        Now U know why TAN KL and TAN CB are so keen.
        Never mind the scolding and curse;just buy the most expensive ear-plugs and look at the bank statements.
        Mr.Nathan ,on your behalf, can I say, "he who laughs last, laughs best all the way to my banks" .Cheers, S'POREANS.LOL!
      • Kahpin 10 months ago
        Eng , sure the figure is right........that a case I pray very hard ,NATHAN die of heart attack tommorrow.....
      • Eng 10 months ago
        TAN KAHPIN, please refer to DPM TEO CHEE HEAN's statement in St, Times LAST MONTH.
        So , after reading it, PRAY VERY HARD until the water boils?
        Wait, if your prayers come true, the family gets a lump sum of .......?$ millions in advance.
        This is all in the package deal for the highest paid Civil Servant of S'pore.
        So ,silly S'poreans VOTE for the Tan boey koo; he has only to wait one month, August.
        One goes, another comes.Never mind we are RICH meh.
    • David  •  10 months ago
      What's the point in having such a "useless" president who just rubber-stamps the decisions of the parliament. Do away with this post and the saving in the president's pay can be spend on other worthwhile causes. Presidency in Singapore equals mega-expensive puppet. Don't need such a president. Don't even want such a president.
    • Darren S  •  10 months ago
      Its all part of govt's top secret "Operation Count Money"

      Knowing that it takes 56 man-years to count our reserves, pap is secretly developing a team of top notch million-dollar ministers to count the money.

      The rigourous training comprise of giving them million-dollar salaries with varying million-dollar bonuses for the money counting. The million-dollar ministers are trained to count money at lightning speed, inspired by the lightning symbol on the pap logo.

      Hopefully, we should see improvements on the 56 man-years needed to count the money.
      • Benjamin 10 months ago
        rofl
      • James Huang 10 months ago
        Count what, inside kosong already,,,,,
      • Observer Tan 10 months ago
        Reserves include land which may take 56 years to value. What singaporeans want to know is the liquid component. Even I can do it in 56 minutes. It is a matter of want or don't want to tell.
    • N  •  10 months ago
      The real question is, do we need a president in Singapore?
      • Natalie Lee 10 months ago
        Answer is NO.
      • sian 10 months ago
        than who is going to wave hand during ndp? ;p
      • pakQ 10 months ago
        Can hire Nathan to do part-time?? one minute = $479.45...
    • X X  •  10 months ago
      For myself, its not bout the disclosure of our reserves or the transparnecy of it. I do agree that if we disclose to the public, many OTHER people will come to know of it which may not be to our advantage. But the thing is, even our President does not know wat & how much reserves we have. If the President knows, and does not disclose it, I would hav no choice but to place my trust in him, that things are working well and that he works somewhat in our best interests.
      The thing is.... he doesn't even know...
    • Sandstorm  •  10 months ago
      No. it does not matter cause whoever is coming out to contest is not doing it for the good of singaporeans.
      take away the SGD $4Mil carrot and we shall see who wants the job...
      Wee Kim Wee & Ong Teng Cheong are the only president i respect..the rest all too far off for me, as for the current president he can go enjoy his millions and get fat sumore... he is the worse president we ever had, and it fxxxing piss me off to see the way he fatten up himself thru the years OF TRYING OUT HIS JOBS! The 1st President & 1st lady to get fat during the term of presidency!
    • Aigoo  •  10 months ago
      We don't need a president with so high a pay that's for sure. But we do need one to show foreign dignitaries around and go to diplomatic parties/functions and create goodwill for Singapore internationally, $100K per year will do.

      As for our reserves..... I have a feeling we have 10s of trillions of $$$. That's why that opposition guy who used to work in GCT office, must have seen papers and said spending 60 billion over many years to improve Singaporeans' lives is peanuts. What do you readers think?
    • K  •  10 months ago
      Now the Prime Minister is very quiet . He does not want to rectify the problems .. why he is happy earning his millions and for another 5 years time, even if PAP vote goes to 55% ,they are still ok . But look native Singaporeans , you are suffering.

      sooner or later, we will be replaced by converted Singaoreans . Never in any country , it is so easy to take up citizenship .

      60% of singaporeans , see what you have done now ?
    • iNViSiGOTH  •  10 months ago
      Is that a joke!! Of course it matters who or rather do we need a President at all!!

      If we need a President than that person need to have powers beyond such that he can tell the party to back off and trash those policies that angers and puts off the people and get it re-work again!!

      If we need a President than that person need to muster back the courage of our former great Ong Teng Chong and be given more executive powers this round so that we can have genuine accountability and transparency of checks and balances!!

      If we need a President than that person need to fight and stand-by the people's voices!!

      If there's none of those and the new President carries the exact same duty as the previous than is it more right to say that we do not need a President and that we can save up millions of our reserves that can be put to good use domestically by looking after the welfare of the people..??
    • teh tarik  •  10 months ago
      We continue to discuss what essentially is a sham. How can the President protect the reserves when there's no transparency about what those reserves amount to? And when GIC and Temasek invest badly and lose billions, where's the protection? We can lose much more by poor investments than by bad spending.
      And the lame excuses given for not being transparent cannot even convince children! If it takes 56 man years to come up with the information, just put 1000 people on the job and it will take less than one month! And the bullshit about transparency hampering GIC and Temasek! Then how can corporations publish financial reports without hampering their own activities? We keep hearing crap and the government wonders why the public does not believe it.
    • Curious  •  10 months ago
      If we do not care who is our president, then why need one? But if the president is just for show, why need one again? Furthemore his pay is crazy high if his job is to sit and shake hand with FT or wave hand for show. Really ppl cannot understand why we need one at this point when our PM is holding all teh decision. Our foreign friend are laughing at Singaporean at our so call wayang show. Our present garman really knows how to act. When can they really improve the situation for ppl.

      Infact, most of us may not understand how much reserve the country had. But blocking the ppl cpf and making used of it and then putting into their pocket with high salary with ppl cpf do not seem right. Even though you may siad 4% interest but most ppl want to have their $$ back and invest themselves than letting someone do it and then getting such pay. Where got meaning right?

      Why not call and election and ask ppl do they want EP? Is it necessary?
    • Kampung Lee  •  10 months ago
      based on what president Nathan had done for Singpapore in the last 12 years I would say it doesnt matter who is the next president. This president Nathan could not even care and bother about the HDB upgradding policy that PAP has in place, it shows how much he cares for just a simple right of Singaporeans.
    • TALK ONLY ONLY ONLY  •  10 months ago
      Government Investment Corporation of Singapore (GIC) & Temasek Holdings wants to remain "NON-TRANSPARENT" because they are too ashamed to reveal how much they have lost over the years especially during the 2008/9 financial crisis and also when you realise who are the bosses of these 2 companies !.
    • The Unwanted  •  10 months ago
      The next president MUST have the power to SACKED any top management CEO or CHIEF from GIC if he/she doesn't perform or worse still who create losses to the nation.The first one to be sacked i don't have to name her i am sure all singaporeans knew.
    • A Yahoo! User  •  10 months ago
      If the president is to stamp and stamp on papers without any obligation or check we might as well get automated machines to screen mistakes and stamp is cheaper!
    • James Huang  •  10 months ago
      No pappies la please, we have enough of you,,,,
    • Michael  •  10 months ago
      Of course it matters. Who want to pay millions of dollars to rear a pussycat!
    • CURLLY  •  10 months ago
      It is not a question of whether WHO?
      iT IS A SIMPLE QUESTION OF "HOW EFFECTIVE" the President would BE!
      WITH PAP AS THE RULING PARTY - IT IS BEST TO BE WITHOUT A "President"!.

    Featured Blog Posts

    Blog Authors / Profiles