Yahoo!. Now with Friends.

Discover news, videos and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    SingaporeScene

    The big debate over parent volunteers

    Actress Zoey Tay has volunteered to work for free at Nanyang Primary School.Actress Zoey Tay has volunteered to work for free at Nanyang Primary School.

    By Seah Chiang Nee

    TV star Zoe Tay, like a US investment billionaire before her, has joined a growing trend in Singapore's high pressure education system.

    The actress volunteered to work without pay at the elite Nanyang Primary School to improve her son's chances of being admitted there in two years' time.

    The demand for a good primary school, regarded as a crucial start in life here, has soared since the government encouraged the intake of thousands of bright students from abroad.

    In 2009, US investment billionaire Jim Rogers, who took up Singapore citizenship, and his wife also performed more than 40 hours of volunteer work at Nanyang Primary.

    Today, their 11-year-old daughter Happy is getting the bilingual education that her parents had intended.

    This practice has become more widespread in recent years as competition for admission into elite schools intensified during registration of Primary One pupils.

    Singaporean parents are prepared to make sacrifices to get their kids into a premium primary school, which they consider as winning half the academic battle.

    As a result, top institutions are swamped with applications every year.

    A practice that promotes elitism?

    Even as the practice spreads, the concept of parent volunteers is under attack for promoting elitism in Singapore society and widening the gap between the rich and the poor.

    An online survey which asked whether schools should do away with the scheme attracted an almost unanimous "yes".

    There are benefits for everyone to get parents involved in the activities of their children's schools, according to ministry officials.

    The broad complaint is, however, that it is helping to put the top primary schools further out of reach of poorer families, at least during registration.

    At the same time it smacks of corruption; instead of paying money for a school place, parents are paying in service, said a social studies student.

    "The scheme works in favour of the well-heeled parents who have the time and qualifications to do it," she said.

    "What happens to the ill-educated and poorer parents who are unable to do so?"

    In fact, then Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew, in a visit to a premium girls' school last November, admitted that the primary school admission system was not meritocratic, as a child's family background played a part.

    Whether a child went into a good school was based on the social class of the parents, Lee had said.

    "So it's not so meritocratic. That's inevitable in any society."

    The aim, he said, was to eventually balance things out at Primary Six.

    "That's what we're aiming to do: regardless of who your father or mother is or was, we go by your performance."

    Obsession with the paper chase

    The preoccupation with the paper chase is a national trait. During recessions, the government often increased the education budget rather than reduce it.

    At home, families spend tens of thousands of dollars a year for special tuition or extra classes for their children.

    The word tuition is probably the first word a Singaporean kid hears as soon as he or she learns to walk.

    And as he grows up, it seldom leaves him; even undergraduates here get tuition.

    It is not surprising to see long lines of parents huddling overnight outside popular tuition centres, waiting to enrol their children when the centres open.

    With this frenetic local preoccupation and tens of thousands of foreign children coming here to study, allocation of places has become a hot potato.

    The education ministry has put in place a registration system giving priority to Singaporeans and PRs, with the first option being given to children of former students.

    The second is reserved for families who live within 1km of the school.

    Next is given to members of an association or a religious group, followed by community grassroots workers.

    And if there are too many applicants, the parent volunteers — or PVs — are given preference but without guarantee.

    Parents face their own test

    In many cases, supply so overwhelms demand that parents who applied had to be interviewed and only a fraction are chosen.

    In one school, only 44 were given the chance out of hundreds who applied last year.

    "It has become laughable having parents anxiously trying to pass a test, something the kids do," said a private tutor.

    "At certain times you can encounter groans and smiles from these grown-ups while their children run around oblivious to it all," he added.

    The number of PVs has doubled in recent years, partly as a result of increased immigration.

    Most PVs are wives of Singapo­reans (now increasingly expatriates), some of whom have taken time off from their jobs to fulfil the role.

    Some parents are surgeons, lawyers and corporate high-fliers with highly impressive application forms.

    "A few submitted pages and pages of their achievements which were mostly a waste since, as a rule, parental qualifications do not count," a school official said.

    Most volunteer work entails reading to pupils, helping to re-organise library books or, as in the case of actress Zoe Tay, it may relate to one's skills or profession.

    School authorities say it is the parents' commitment to the school that is often decisive, including the number of volunteer hours.

    Forty hours is the minimum, but the popular ones fix it at 80 hours.

    One kiasu (a Hokkien term meaning 'afraid to lose') parent is said to have clocked in a staggering 600 hours, or more than four months' full-time work.

    With pressures of life so pressing, I wonder how it is affecting young Singaporeans' enthusiasm to marry — let alone produce babies.

     

    315 comments

    • Sparklingscent  •  6 months ago
      Why should our elite schools be opened to non-Singaporeans at all? They should have a criteria where all the students are Singaporeans with NS-served daddies. None of those bulls**t new-Singaporeans. Don't give us that crap that foreign kids are brilliants etc. Rubbish. This is just primary school.
    • OldSporean  •  6 months ago
      It is a sad day for Spore when we allow something even though we know it is not right. Ask yourself this question - children from humble backgrounds whose parents are busy working, how can they afford to be volunteers? So how will these children ever get into these "good" schools? This becomes a vicious cycle. The way things go here we may eventually accept nepotism as our way of life...or is it here already?
    • MeliaAnn  •  6 months ago
      In the case of the "artist" Zoe Tay - what would her work related skills be? Seriously - I rather my kids attend a down to earth school instead of trying to keep up with the Jone's.
    • Anna  •  6 months ago
      The writer got it wrong. I guess many parents would have known:

      -> The 1km advantage is not above alumni, PV, Clan etc.

      It is only useful for every phase when there requires balloting. If any Phase (be it alumni, PV, Clan etc) has application rate > available slots, the 1km children will go in first, then 1-2km then 2km.

      If more 1km children then the available slots for a given phase, balloting will occur within 1km.

      Many people who has not gone through primary registration, has a misconception of 1km advantage, including the author.
    • pooh  •  6 months ago
      I think priority needs to be given to students with siblings who is still in school, Singaporean and distance to school. Parent volunteer should not be one of the criteria for admission. Distance to school is very important, well at least for me. My child went to a primary school near our place and we are glad we did that since she can save some time from traveling for more rest.
    • -  •  6 months ago
      This is the great Singapore kiasu and kiasi culture. wherever there there is free gifts or goodies it would be snatched as soon as the news is out. i am quite surprised that i manage to get a total of $1000+ $500 + $500 + $500= $2500 cash through some windfall. i did tell other friends about it but too bad they just don't believe or willing its true. anyway its good news for me if not i wouldn't even have the chance to get them. but coming back to this topic, we must do away with this unfair scheme as we should promote equal chances in singapore.
    • Sandwiches Mom  •  6 months ago
      Folks, it all depends on the children learning abilities and parents' mindset.

      大庙的小和尚 or 小庙的大和尚?

      If your kid is in a normal neighbourhood school, then you work hard to get the kid focus (IQ), to teach him/her well (EQ). It's easier to shine in a small school. Just imagine to top above 200 kids is always easier than 400-500 kids.
    • Senso  •  6 months ago
      A child from an elite class does not necessarily perform better than from the ordinary class.
      In fact, students from ordinary schools has proven that they are able to out perform those from any well known school.
      So. it should be left to the individual schools to decide what are the admission criterias. The public or media should not pick on parents from the elite class. Especially if they have fulfilled the necessary conditions like all other ordinary SIngaporean parents.
    • mmr  •  6 months ago
      This sounds like corruption, but of a subtle kind. I empathise with and my sympathies to all parents who are not able to take advantage of the PV scheme instituted by MOE. Another hurdle to having children in Singapore unless you already have a foot in the door.
    • Ah Beng  •  6 months ago
      There should be none of these nonsense! It's a form of corruption and bribary! Ridiculous! It breeds trouble and send the wrong message to our kids! The Minister for Education really need to look into this and also the excessiveness in terms of the curriculum for the Primary school, they are robbing all the kids of their childhood! That's why we don't have a creative society, children are not allowed enough time for play and have fun, stress over homework at such a young age! Ridiculous!
    • Fashionspook  •  6 months ago
      My son had to change schools because we moved from the west to the east. In my area - the upper east coast - there are alot of good schools, but to my astonishment none had any vacancies. Eventually we got a placement at a school about 15 minutes drive from my house - and in a class with over 40 other students! How is a teacher supposed to teach 40 kids?????

      Don't believe all this rubbish about investing in schools. The simple fact is that schools are full and there are no vacancies due to poor planning by the MOE. So many new housing developments but where are the new schools? Its the MOE who have set up this ridiculous system and under invested in schools for so long.
    • S  •  6 months ago
      If the MOE scrap the idea of priority for PV and grassroot personnel, how many will still want to work as PV now? Isn't it pathetic then to see that the all the so-called volunteers did it wiith a motive in mind?

      Even if this was scrapped, no one can complain. Because all Parent volunteers have been told that doing PV doesn't guarantee a place for their child right at the beginning.
    • Wealthy Assets  •  6 months ago
      PAP and MOE is hypocite, manipulating the HDB price and Schools

      Why not build more schools ...why demolish them to create shortages while telling parents to give brith? Where is the monehy and school for these children ?

      Look at CBD area, how many primary school and sec school were demolsihed for Commerical purposes ?????
    • Andy  •  6 months ago
      Send your kids to Nayang Primary school and your kids will have a high chance of lossing interest in learning. My kid is in top class in this school, but hates this school. One of the teachers practices military style. A few other practice Chinese communinist discplinary style. I am seriously considering moving my kid to a neighbourhood school or overseas. My kid will be happier and learn better. Believe me,if your kids are not happy and under lots of stress at this young age, they won't learn well. They may score well, but not learn well. Learning is a life long process.

      MOE is a failure. Some VIP said before the last election that teacher:student ratio is 1:19. Which school has 1:19 ratio? Nanyang has 1:30+. How can the education system improve with this kind of ratio? Teachers cannot pay enough attention to students. Teachers spend more time to keep the classes in order than to teach. They get frustrated with lots of work, and loss passion with teaching.

      We need smaller classes for our children. We need better teachers for our children. We need to train our teachers better for our children. We need to give our teachers more time and less work for our children. We need to nuture a right value and commitment in our teachers. We may need to pay our teachers better for our children. Teachers are the most important thing to our education systems. Not the hardware. Yes, this needs money. Then, let's don't spend so much on defence. Spend more our money on things that are important to the people, and not on things that are important to the politicians.
    • Gman  •  6 months ago
      "Parent Volunteers" - How'd this become the term for parent's giving their time to a school to increase the chances of their child's acceptance? The word VOLUNTEER is so incorrectly used!
    • Geraldine  •  6 months ago
      Parents facing this choice can be so helpless. For me -- I emphasize: just me, I wouldn't slog myself for all those hours to get my kid into an elite school because my husband and I wouldn't want to un-do our kids out of the idea of them being 'elites' -- read: better than others (what kind of value is that?).

      While we do not mind our children going to 'so-classified' average neighbourhood schools nearby our place, work attitudes of teachers can be very different in neighbourhood and elite schools because criteria for selection of teachers are not much different from students! By P6 when the kids, whether from elite or not background, 'should balance out' as suggested, self-esteem of the children would have been ruined by how teachers and people around suggest to them and their perception of themselves.

      My choice? I opt out. My time should be spent educating my children while they are still with me.
    • DL  •  6 months ago
      The system is categorising and ranking the schools into "First Class, Business Class and Economy Class" schools...very sad situation
    • so  •  6 months ago
      2 years back, when I met a foreigner friend in my neighbourhood, I told her of my failed attempt
      to get my boy into a very well established school in my area. She was kind to suggest 2 quick ways to get my kid in. Either by joining as a clan member of the school or attaching a $500 behind the application form. I was a bit taken aback but I could no2t help but notice that many PR's children got into that school.

      This way of getting things done is their way of life. But, I certainly hope that our schools do not encourage such practices. If that school had accepted their children this way, I am certainly glad that I did not send my kid to such a school to learn from their educators.
    • Mate Mat  •  6 months ago
      with so many parent volunteers and a cut in pay for those re-employed after retirement, this is how to cut cost and show how good the ministers are in controlling cost so that it will upped their kpi and ensure more good years and more bonuses for themselves.
      both my wife and myself never volunteered our time in pri. sch. we don't believe it this @#$%.
      as parents don't be stupid and become the unwanted, get lead by the nose to do the unnecessary for the ungrateful.
    • Magma H  •  6 months ago
      I think the state of affairs in Singapore is deplorable. We not only have a well-paid actress competing with ordinary parents, we even have a US investment billionaire elbowing other parents to get ahead. This is NOT the way for our next generation.
      I am very disheartened. The kids should be enrolled based on proximity to the schools.
      Simple as that. And places should reserved for local born parents as well as students. Foreigners should go fly kite in other countries. I am livid that our Singapore Government is, again, choosing to step over the bodies of Singaporeans to get investments in Singapore. Incorrigible.

    Most Popular Stories

    Blog Authors / Profiles