Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

 

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    SingaporeScene

    '‘Orchid Evolution’ sweeping through S’pore'

    A mother and daughter were found dead in Bukit Batok on Friday. (Yahoo!)Veteran editor P N Balji said a new mood is gripping Singapore. (Photo courtesy of Reputation Management Assoc …

    The "Jasmine Revolution" or turmoil that has toppled governments in the Middle East is not likely to take place in Singapore, but a major transformation is sweeping through society in the country, said a veteran local journalist and editor.

    Speaking before an audience of about 80 executives at a seminar on corporate reputations on Friday morning, PN Balji, former CEO and editor-in-chief of TODAY newspaper, said this transformation, or what he termed as Singapore's "Orchid Evolution", is reflected by the new mood of the nation and other changes.

    "I notice a certain restlessness, even restiveness, among different sections of the people," said the former editor with over 40 years of experience in journalism.

    "Because the government has played a critical role, a womb-to-tomb role in people's lives, now there's a boomerang effect. They blame the government for everything that goes wrong in Singapore."

    He said there have been "quite a lot" of blunders in the past few years such as the flooding of Orchard Road, the security lapse at the MRT station and the prison escape of Singapore Jemaah Islamiyah leader Mas Selamat Kastari.

    Coverage of politics

    Balji, who is currently director of the Asia Journalism Fellowship at the Nanyang Technological University, noted that the public's new attitude towards the government goes in tandem with the change in how the traditional media cover the opposition parties.

    "It is like a breath of fresh air, the way the media is now reporting on opposition politicians and opposition politics," he said.

    "There are two elements to this. One, the kind of prominence that opposition politicians and politics gets, and, second, the reports try very hard not to put them in a negative light, which as recent as 2006 was not true."

    He believed that that this approach by the traditional media would not have gone ahead without some tacit acceptance by the government.

    "Why do I think the government has tacitly agreed to this? I think the government doesn't want readership, circulation, viewership to drop," he said.

    "If it drops the biggest loser is the government. They don't have any other platform which can reach that wide an audience."

    He acknowledged that social media is available, but that it may not work for the PAP. He cited how Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong's attempt to make a joke on Facebook about PAP's new candidate, Tin Pei Ling, fell flat.

    "The new media is putting a lot of pressure on the mainstream media. If for some reason the mainstream media is not seen to reflect a kind of public opinion, they are going to be punished, and punished very, very heavily," he said.

    Other issues

    Meanwhile, he noted that immigration has become one of the biggest issues in Singapore, despite the government making "concession after concession".

    "I don't think a right-thinking Singaporean is against foreigners per se. I think they understand foreigners are needed," he said.

    The question among people's minds is how come this government, if it is so good, cannot manage the problems of infrastructure -- whether the congestion of roads and MRT trains or the rocketting prices of housing -- that came as a result of it opening the immigration floodgates in 2005, he added.

    Another change that he has observed has come over Singapore is the wild swings in economic growth. "One year you will go into recession, next year you will have 15 percent growth, the next year maybe 5 percent. How the people will adjust to that wild swing is another issue."

    Furthermore, he believes the attitude towards older people has changed. He noted that the PAP has been stressing the point of having young people.

    "The government keeps on harping on young people, but what is there to say you can't have a 65-year-old man or woman serving Parliament for five years?" he asked.

    Yearning for change

    Overall, however, based on his conversations with different types of people, Balji said that he gets a genuine feeling from people that they are not against the PAP government, but that they have a strong desire for more voices in Parliament.

    "Look at the opposition, the young, talented, impressive people who are joining the opposition. That must indicate that there is less fear, and there is really a genuine desire to see some kind of change -- not the change of revolution, but a change in wanting more voices," he said.

    He said he could not tell how this new groundswell of opinion would translate in the upcoming polls.

    "Maybe this is just people letting out steam, and when it comes to the final analysis, they know which side their bread is buttered," he said.

    Nevertheless, his gut feeling based on anecdotal evidence is: "One, I won't even be surprised that the PAP doesn't lose any seats. Two, that they might even take back Potong Pasir. Three, there will be a number of close fights, very close some of them. Fourth point, PAP's percentage of votes may go down even further. In good times, they manage 60 percent of the votes."

    Follow Yahoo! News on Twitter and become a fan on Facebook.

     

    179 comments

    • Citizen A  •  1 year 1 month ago
      >>>> Nevertheless, his gut feeling based on anecdotal evidence is: "One, I won't even be surprised that the PAP doesn't lose any seats. Two, that they might even take back Potong Pasir. Three, there will be a number of close fights, very close some of them. Fourth point, PAP's percentage of votes may go down even further. In good times, they manage 60 percent of the votes."

      Mr Balji, it is not a win-lose situation. PAP losing seats is only a means to an important end for all Singaporeans. Think win-win for Singapore ---- we know that we need alternative voices in the Government to come up with more innovative solutions than to make people pay and pay; we need leaders with strong morals and ethics to note the difference between paying well and paying exorbitantly; we need check and balance because no party is infallible or flawless; we need accountability in leaders who take responsibility and step down for major mistakes, or correct wrong polices that are hurting Singaporeans; we need leaders listen, not those who pretend to listen, fake understanding people's concerns and carry out what they (the leaders) themselves had intended to do anyway; we need leaders who genuinely want alternative Singaporean voices who wish the best for all Singaporeans; we need leaders who do not create a fake alternative voice (NMP or NCMP) arrangement to deceive the voters that they have robust debate; we need genuine caring leaders, not those who visit us only on a night before election in a full 5-year election cycle and ask us if we have concerns, and pacify us; we need leaders, not administrators ...
      • onestreetaway 1 year 1 month ago
        Well spoken Sirius
      • GunWith Roses 1 year 1 month ago
        We need leaders who govern the nation with empathy and not as a corporation.
      • cooler 1 year 1 month ago
        Precisely, win or lose doesn't make every of us good. We need alternative way to make Singapore more healthy. Well say Sirius
    • KT  •  1 year 1 month ago
      I love Singapore. It's my homeland.

      I hope to see true democracy take root. That means having more opposition in parliament and allowing the media to speak up so that the media people will not be seen as bootlickers.

      I see the ruling party (and as many do) have become very elitist, arrogant, and unconcerned about the ordinary folks. The evidence is everywhere - rising home prices, crowded transport, rising health costs and long waiting time at hospitals and clinics, dormitories near our residence, ERPs everywhere, rising food prices, rising motoring costs, and rising education costs.

      They have made blunders and yet refuse to acknowledge the mistakes made whether it is Mat Selamat escape or TH's losses in investments, or allowing foreign migrants in large numbers to seek employment in every sector imaginable and hence displacing our very own people who have served NS.

      They continue to ignore our criticisms that the Ministers' and MPs' pay are way out of proportion to what is really a reasonable amount.

      I truly believe we need a change or we will suffer for the next 5 years.
      • I Do Care 1 year 1 month ago
        Well said.
      • Free Singapore 1 year 1 month ago
        I will be a change for the worse. All the examples you cited merely reflect the reality of an increasing competitive world. A multiparty system with socialist tendencies will simply make things worse.
      • xx 1 year 1 month ago
        KT, I agree absolutely with your comment, and I can't believe that there would be any Singaporean who would disagree with what you said. Which leads me to believe the 8 @#$% who gave ur posting the thumbs down are probably bloody foreigners!
    • Kikpapout  •  1 year 1 month ago
      Serve 2 yrs of NS. end up having to take order from a foreign superior, which know nothing except bootlick boss.

      Worst of all, foreigner even laugh at me for losing out to them cos im Singaporean. Wat orchid revolution? i wish there is a bloody revolution to change the situation in Singapore!

      No respect, no integrity, nothing!!! Cant find any reason to like my govt. I still love my country.
      Can something change this coming GE?
      • Tan 1 year 1 month ago
        I agree with you. I spend 2.5 years in NS...!@#!@#!#@
        After NS still must go reservist...and foreigner ??? continue working and catching up to you....

        Is gov that naive thinking the employer will appreciate our service to army ? Dont be stupid ! Then foreigner laugh at us ...our pay .....and our age...2 years older than them and achieve the same as them.....if i am given two years more !

        ALSO ! go back reservist doing nothing !!! WASTE MY LIFE THERE! PAP ? There's only one finger to represent you.
      • Anti Affairs 1 year 1 month ago
        110% agree!! Serve NS...Serve home team for 1 year for source ..landed what in return?? Now working 1hr/$5 and struggling !! Thank you loh GVT and WGS the mas selamat releaser!!!!!!!!!!!!!
      • ann zuar ah nae 1 year 1 month ago
        i hope you didn't literally mean a BLOODY revolution. have you any idea how many died and how many others suffered in a true bloody revolution?

        if working for a chow ang moh and a few ignorant remarks from a chow ang moh whom you yourself say has no brains makes you want a bloody revolution, then you bloody dun deserve any sympathy.
    • Student  •  1 year 1 month ago
      Yes... We Singaporeans love our country...We are loyal to our country...
      This is a fact...

      But recent policies are all so revenue driven... and how did the property prices appreciate 60% within 2 years? Why is the BTO scheme still in use when clearly now demand is overwhelming?

      The young... needs to try for so many times...wasting years of waiting... and your HDB build in 3-4 years time.. This is call productivity? Land scarce? if cant support 6.5mil then close your floodgate... this is not an excuse anymore...

      Especially for someone drawing millions of taxpayers money annually... you don't turn your back on who pays you...Understand?!
      • tigra 1 year 1 month ago
        ya :)
      • Verbal Diahorrea 1 year 1 month ago
        great attitude! this is what we want. hard hitting statements and finally 'Understand?!' And @Student, we need ppl like you to join the opposition to make a clear stand! kudows!
    • Interpol  •  1 year 1 month ago
      It is NOT more voices in Parliament,
      It is MORE ACTIONS to serve the common Sinagporeans.

      Welcome the Orchid Revolution in coming GE!
      • Tan 1 year 1 month ago
        that's if we succeed in more actions in this coming GE...hopefully some changes else Singaporean is history.
    • wamphoop  •  1 year 1 month ago
      excellent article.What insight.Unbiased, daring and spot on with no @#$%.
      In the past,our parents n grandparents they weren't exposed to the internet.They watched singaporean made programns(tcs ) and they read singaporean made papers(ziao bao etc).What about today?We have the usage of the internet,we have cable, we read ny times etc. What i am trying to say is,unlike what most men in white is stating(that we aren't hungry enough),We are just better informed. We know how much the President of USA is being paid.We know how much Temasak has lost,We know how things function outside our little bubble(which e government blown n which kept alot of things out for our parents).The bubble burst,we opened our eyes n see e real world out there and we asked ourselves...."WTH IS E GOVERNMENT OF SINGAPORE DOING?" Opposition will grow stronger from now on.Mainly because the governemt ways of brushing the people aside n feeding them their own brand of food has expired. PAP u need to clean up ur act.the people mind set has changed. U the so call A team must realised that. Do nnot be like MAH, He f up big time. I suggest sacking Mah to appease the people first, His talent of messing up is not what we need for singapore. Next take LPT out n groom her well.How to speak,how to act and let her grow up before fielding her.When she is ready ,we will accept her. Stop torturing the poor gal. After that collectively apologised to the public. Admit ur mistakes of these current years. Take a huge paycut to show us ur sincerity n take time off from ur "work" for some PR skills. Den the next election i can say....the so call noise of the people will lessen.
    • Catherine  •  1 year 1 month ago
      So finally, the media is admitting that they were not fair to the Oppositions in the past, although we knew it all along
    • AH BENG  •  1 year 1 month ago
      Balji, after the whole story u have written, end of the day you still side d P & P.
      Scare to offence the P & P. This is the attitude Singaporean have.
      But 2011 will be a different year vote WP WP WP into parliament
    • Criticise  •  1 year 1 month ago
      Well articulated, Mr Balji. Can't agree any less on this. Very apt to name this transformation as 'Orchid Revolution'.

      For decades since Independence, Singaporeans by and large are very peaceful people and we were well known for being 'obedient' in the eyes of foreign observers who are somehow used to the individualistic and defiant culture in democratic societies. But, it seems like the MIWs here, after their decades of deliberate social engineering, have taken our peacefulness for meekness.

      When we are now unhappy with MIW policies, we never go on mass protests or violence like what we see in E----pt and Libya. But that doesn't mean we're there to be continued to be trampled upon by the MIWs, who from time to time call us names such as 'lesser mortals' and the likes. These MIW chaps should feel fortunate that we Singaporeans are peaceful, because if they are politicians in other countries, probably they might be assaulted by violent, disgruntled elements out of anger and vengeance for the type of policies they enact, and the type of language they use to hurl insults at the common folks.

      To MIWs, be thankful you're in Singapore. We might be peaceful and do not resort to violence (perhaps though there had been isolated incidents such as the torching of one MIW not long ago) but please do not take us for granted. We at the most complain for most of the time yet you chaps see these as 'noise'. Since you disregard our voices, and since we're by and large peaceful and amicable people, we shall exercise our own form of 'revolution' through the power of the ballot.
    • A Yahoo! User  •  1 year 1 month ago
      whether its the immigration issues, or the housing, or the jobs, or the IR, its all legitmate concerns, and singaporeans has every right to voice their displeasure with the pap policies...having said that, pap did what any govt in the world would have done, with or without the million dollar pay package, of coz. They implemented policies which will ensure a quick and sure-win way to good GDP figures. Well, afterall, their performance is measured against the GDP figures.
      The majority of us singaporeas never really featured in their grandiose plans, even if there is, we are mere digits to be convienently chuck aside, if need be. U see, if workforce can be mass imported from overseas so easily, so why then the need to nurture your own pple? Corporations have long embraced the concept of use and throw successfully, pap would be fool hardy not to use them. Theirs is a doctrine of survive/prosper at all cost...well, its actually reassuring for wealthy investors, to know that the money parked here would be around for a long time, but for most singaporeans, life just seems pessimistic, like living in a tunnel with no sight of light at the end.
      Its a quagmire. On one hand, singapore's existence is at stake, and on the other, singaporean's aspirations to live like pple in the first world countries. The reality is our land is simply too small to have the pie and eat it. I never wana be a quitter, but i am pragmatic and i jolly well know singapore is not for me. Only regret is wasting my time serving NS for nothing.
    • For our future's sake ...  •  1 year 1 month ago
      This is an 'Orchid revolution' and a 'People awakening.' Time we stopped eating whatever is dished out to us by our reputable doctor, who has served us well for so long, and start looking for a second opinion before it's too late.
      There will always come a time when our reliable doctor will start to fall a little behind, and then it's time for some else to take over.
      There has to be a change now before things get worse.
    • Kenny  •  1 year 1 month ago
      balji,

      thanks for sharing your views. you made many interesting observations.

      you said : "Maybe this is just people letting out steam, and when it comes to the final analysis, they know which side their bread is buttered,"

      in my opinion, there's way too much "steam" this time around not to put heat on pap.
      i believe Singaporeans are aware that the "butter" that pap has been coating all these years, has become stale and in fact, gone bad.

      i, for one, prefer to ensure that we are delivered bread assuredly at an affordable price by removing the monopoly that pap has on producing bread.
    • Greet Me !  •  1 year 1 month ago
      Balji

      I have to disagree with 2 of the points you predict.

      1) "I don't think a right-thinking Singaporean is against foreigners per se. I think they understand foreigners are needed,"

      Yes we need foreign workers to work in Singapore. To take up jobs that are shun by Singaporean. No we don't need many so-called foreign talents, we must give our local talents (PMET) the priority FIRST. Unless, we don't have enough of our local talents (PMET) to fill up a specific position then we can think of getting minimun foreign talents only for that specific position.

      2) "One, I won't even be surprised that the PAP doesn't lose any seats.

      You are going to be surprised that PAP will be losing big this G.E for sure. Mark my words. The ground sentiments are getting ferocious. They can't wait to vote.
    • SGGuy  •  1 year 1 month ago
      We need more opposition members in the Parliment. It is like the same reason why PAP is bringing in more FT to Singapore. FT will complete with Singaporean for Housing, Food, Job etc. They are keeping Singaporean on their toes and hence yield improvement and productivity. Likewise, we should endorse PAP mindset and policy by voting in more opposition members to Parilment to bring in competition. This will yield a better, faster and cheaper PAP. At the same time, to provide a check and balance to PAP.
    • kreep  •  1 year 1 month ago
      Come on people look at now what the Chief Editor is saying.... Yes he makes sense to a certain point but think logically will these actually happen if :

      1) The emergence of Facebook
      2) Yahoo South East Asia where we can post comments
      3) The emergence of Apples iphones where we can get to view daily news on the go.
      4) The emergence of Youtube where we can upload our personal views and
      do create comments there.

      ( All these points if it did not take place)

      Please you talk about the government being tacit about the media like strait times and being finally fair to report on the opposition and all ….. To be honest the 4 points I mentioned above if these did not take place would your “Strait Times” “New Paper” or even “Today” paper would not be fair at all. Ya you are right now social media and all coming in-play you give us report on how “jasmine revolution” and all please when you were Editor and Chief you must have known then how unfair the media was to the opposition yet why did you not take a stand ? Why did your papers not report on them ? Why because the government will make you all brankupt ???Come on …. Now useless to tell us that oh the social media,this platform and that platform because we all know how corrupt our own media industry is and are like government slaves so we are now using different mediums .

      Think logically how come just in this election all the older Ministers are stepping down? YA they use explanations like to pave the way for the younger generation and all comeon its rubbish and you and I know it! They know oh my goodness now all Singaporeans have the voice they are banding together and using different platfirms and social medias to make their points and government cannot do anything about it because they do not own these medias thus the best thing to do is get out while they can. Logically think this is the first time so many PAP candidates have step down in all these years and we must think to ourseleves why??

      Kudos to Mark Zukerberg and the rest who have brought us a new way to express our thoughts. All this rubbish media and look what happened to our “failed Speakers Corner”. Yes its time for us to let our thoughts be expressed.
      And yes the way forward now is to listen to the thinking-Singaporeans and not think we will conform to your arm-twisting methods you have used in all these years.
    • One-Leg-Kick  •  1 year 1 month ago
      I spent many years serving NS and then served my army reservists on my own costs and time (I was posted overseas for work - but came back on my own expenses to fulfill my reservists commitment).

      I forgone career development when I was away for Reservist training. I am a true 100% Singaporean Son who has given up a lot for the safety and guardianship for Singapore.

      Because of PAP's earlier policies to NOT have lee way for Singles, (tell me who would not wish to find a life partner) I could not qualify back then for a HDB flat. I had to dig deep and took the long term debt plunge to buy a private apartment. But the irony is that I paid more taxes as a single status to FUND the greedy pockets of the Money-faced ministers who had million Dollar salaries. And what do I get in return? I am jobless (a PMET approaching 50) and have to compete with Foreign talent.

      I am so disappointed with the present corp of self serving, money faced MiW in the garvament.
    • Nobody  •  1 year 1 month ago
      Nevertheless, his gut feeling based on anecdotal evidence is: "One, I won't even be surprised that the PAP doesn't lose any seats. Two, that they might even take back Potong Pasir. Three, there will be a number of close fights, very close some of them. Fourth point, PAP's percentage of votes may go down even further. In good times, they manage 60 percent of the votes."

      Well, if this happens, I would say we Singaporean are hopeless. If we are not happy with the current situation but dare not to vote for a change, we are telling them they can do whatever they want to. If this happens, we should not blame anybody anymore but ourselves. We ask for it and deserve it.
      Many people are believing that opposition do not have enough talents to form a government and still put their hopes on PAP. To me, talents will come to them should the opposition party win the election and become the government. PAP won't give it a @#$% for a few seats going to opposition. What can they do except for making some noises? So the ultimate goal is not to just vote a few oppositions into the Parliament but to form a new government.
    • A Yahoo! User  •  1 year 1 month ago
      I CANNOT WAIT TO CAST MY VOTE TO THE OPPOSITION....!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
      REVOLUTION IS COMING SOON.....VOTE OUT MBT, GCT, TPL, LHL etc....!
    • BULL !  •  1 year 1 month ago
      That is why we need a CHANGE !
      Yes we can !
      Yes we need to !
      We need to prove that PAP is no longer a dynasty we need in SG.

      I don't want a PAP Singapore. I want a true Singaporean Singapore !
      I want a SG citizen first policy !

      If you being a citizen is not given preference or first priority, can it still be called your own home ground any more ? !
    • Interpol  •  1 year 1 month ago
      It is NOT more voices in Parliament,
      It is more ACTIONS to serve the common Singaporeans in Parliament.

      Will it be an Orchid Revolution in the coming GE?

    Featured Blog Posts

    Blog Authors / Profiles