Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

 

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    SingaporeScene

    Would S’pore commuters bear the cost of more buses?

    Minister of State for Finance and Transport Josephine Teo and REACH chairman Amy Khor respond to questions posed to them at the REACH Budget 2012 dialogue on Wednesday. (Yahoo! photo)Minister of State for Finance and Transport Josephine Teo and REACH chairman Amy Khor respond to questions posed …

    Members of the public couldn't help but ask after the government announced it would spend $1.1 billion to add hundreds of buses to run along Singapore's streets.

    Responding to several questions about this at a REACH dialogue on this year's budget on Wednesday evening, Minister of State for Finance and Transport Josephine Teo explained that the government's aim was to improve service in public transport, which suffered a big blow in December when a series of train disruptions affected hundreds of thousands of commuters.

    In additional to the planned purchase of 800 more buses by the government and local transport firms, she said a rail extension or a new rail line would also be introduced each year leading up to 2016.

    Teo noted concerns that operation costs will increase for public transport firms SBS Transit and SMRT given the need to pay for more fuel, more drivers and even more space at interchanges, but that government's purchase of 550 of the buses will help alleviate the burden of increase fares that could be handed down to commuters.

    "Fares at some point will still have to be adjusted, we all know this," she said. "But if we were not to put in this injection, then the pressure on fares will be very, very heavy, and that is something we think is not very suitable at this point in time."

    Asked whether the cost of the transport operators' own purchase of 250 of the additional 800 buses could be passed on to consumers in the form of raised fares, Teo maintained that the fare formula used by the Public Transport Council (PTC), which approves fare adjustments, is not impacted by the government's move to finance the purchase of the rest of the buses.

    She also explained that increasing bus capacity was deemed a faster way to improve public transport service levels while rail capacity was gradually being built up.

    "We think that what Singaporeans want is a quicker solution. They don't want to wait so long, so it's with Singaporeans' needs in mind that we assessed that the better, faster and more efficient way to do it is to partner the existing public transport operators to deliver the increased capacity. That's why it's done in partnership with them," she said.

    Slightly fewer than 200 members of the public were present at the REACH Budget 2012 Dialogue, where about 20 came forward with questions and feedback for Dr Khor and Mrs Teo. (Yahoo! photo)Slightly fewer than 200 members of the public were present at the REACH Budget 2012 Dialogue, where about 20 came …

    Other issues

    Addressing about 200 members of the public, business community and youth ambassadors alongside REACH chairman Amy Khor, Teo also fielded questions on other aspects of this year's budget such as measures to help the disabled and the silver housing bonus.

    In particular, Teo paid special attention to explaining the measures in place for small and medium enterprises (SMEs), which she said are the "lifeblood" of Singapore's economy.

    Noting that the nature of land-scarce Singapore, located in the heart of an emerging Asia, would mean that the country would always have a tight labour market, Teo said that the government aimed to help SMEs build their capabilities, and make them stronger and a more attractive option to employees five to 10 years on.

    Turning to a related issue -- that of foreign workers -- Teo conceded the difficulties that many SMEs face with hiring local labour, but also acknowledged the reasons why local labour find the jobs unattractive, given their financial needs and skills training.

    "To some extent, wages and work conditions have to improve, otherwise many Singaporeans will find it hard to enter certain jobs," she said. "But at the same time, we also need our workers to respond, to consider the fact that it's better to have a job than no job at all. It's better to pick up new skills, to go into sectors which are still hiring than to insist on being in a sector that is no longer hiring. So both sides need to make the adjustments."

    Related news
    Budget 2012 round-up: Singapore to reduce foreign worker inflow

     
    • rosey  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      I really don't understand why the Govt is funding this BIG corporation which makes huge profits. They jolly well can manage & purchase more buses. The money can chanelled to other areas for good course for Singaporean. Like FREE education to university instead of increasing the "DAMN" fee. The Govt should invest EDUCATION to the next generation. Buying more buses for who sake?? - import more FTs in years to come. Our next generation will suffer. FREE education, Free medicine for seniors citizens. NO GST on transport. No GST on hopitalization & medicine. NO GST on Food. The Govt should look into these areas instead to the "BLOODY" rich company.
      • A Yahoo! User 3 months ago
        ya true the $$ should be channelled for the next generations instead of bus ..
      • Henry3 3 months ago
        All the share holders laugh n laugh. Very Big Ang Pow.
      • 叉叉 3 months ago
        What's so difficult to understand?

        We see this all the time in all forms, except you can't quite call it out.

        It's called, "Being in bed with one another".

        And yet, we are the ones being screwed... go figure!
    • A Yahoo! User  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      Come on who owns majority shares of SMRT and SBS, temasick right. Take public monies to help themselves and said how capable they are. Self praise international digrace.
      • Sponge Bob 3 months ago
        Nah, they know how to protect themselves with lawyers. We poor people cannot afford to tease them. You know these bad losers when they get angry.
      • a citizen of Singapore 3 months ago
        I'm afraid it will set a precedent for related companies to ride on this wagon.
        So who will be the next to enjoy this windfall $$$$ ?
    • Swan Hunter  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      Without the 2 million foreigners we won't need to spend this kind of money. This is the result of PAP government's mistake yet they expect us to foot the bills. It is simple, either the bus fares remain or the PAP out!
      • B.H. 3 months ago
        PAP must be out by 2016
      • PingPong 3 months ago
        Read what Jo says again -
        "We think that what SINGAPOREANS want is a quicker solution. They don't want to wait so long, so it's with SINGAPOREANS' needs in mind that ......."
        She could be thinking only Singaporeans take the public transport, leh!
      • David 3 months ago
        Bro Swan hunter...you hit the G spot man!! Tell these 2 Aunties to take public transport for a month and bet these 2 Aunties will "shut-up"!!
    • Squall  •  3 months ago
      Why should taxpayer fund a MILLION DOLLARS PROFIT MAKING COMPANY???????? Why can't they use their f*cking profit to buy the buses? Aren't they obligated to do so? Aren't they privatized? What is happening? Is this the best the million dollar salary man can give?
      • Sponge Bob 3 months ago
        Well 60% voted out of fear rather then logic.
      • 阎罗王 3 months ago
        buy more buses, that will mean we can see more buses parking at interchange.... this shows that this company had poor poor poor management skill....
      • HDB Pte Ltd 3 months ago
        Squall - PAP will never give you a logical answer for a simple question like that.

        This has never changed, and idiot voters will experience this in 2016 again. Right after elections, prices of things will INCREASE AND INCREASE again and again. . . . fantastic isn't it?
    • dfgdfd  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      How many time liao, all fellow singaporean comrade. Explanation first then after a while increase price again. We believe that the Garment craps every budget then increase price again.Eventually who pay the bill?????? We Singaporean!!!!!!!!!!!!!! take them down la, do not say anymore. These people are the Garment,therefore no Garment liao
      • Sponge Bob 3 months ago
        Hey, even after they cut their salaries, it's still hard to maintain and taxpayers has to continue feeding their greedy appetite for richness over serving the public.
    • tax heaven  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      By buying buses for current "private operators", the govt has EFFECTIVELY SHUT OUT ANY OTHER POSSIBLE COMPETITION in the transportation business. We are essentially having to pay for all their inefficiencies,poor managementand supernormal profits.

      In S'pore, the only loosers are the customers.
    • Average Singaporean  •  3 months ago
      Teo, pls explain, is it normal for corporates to receive $1.1b for Management Failure? You think bailout ah? SMRT SBS so high profits!!!!!

      Pls also explain in details how much these $1.1b going to be handed to commuters via suppressed fare hike. How much goes to reducing operation cost, thus increased profit, thus top mgt bonuses, and Temasek/ST dividends.

      Transparency and accountability right?
    • The Unwanted  •  3 months ago
      Got money to pump in no money to return our CPF.
    • Jenny  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      The govt always have the habbit of giving a piece pork chop but inreturn ask for a whole pig.
    • Papadam Singh  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      Do you honestly believe them when they claim that they want to attract Singaporeans to be bus drivers by buying 800 buses and raising drivers salary ?? Frankly, only the nutcases and the goondus will believe them... b'cos the bulk of the vacancies are going to be filled by the Ah Tiongs and the Ah Nehs.... and worse of all, they are using S$ 1.1billion of taxpayers money to do it.
    • S C  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      It is the PAP Govt's fault to open the floodgates to let in so many foreigners and over stress the transport system and now they are using taxpayers money to fund the purchase of 800 buses (free of charge) for a public listed company. WTF !! Where is the logic ??
    • Nes  •  3 months ago
      SAME THING ....................BASICALLY GOT DUPED INTO PAY N PAY AGAIN................WHAT CHANGE????????????????????

      HUH.......................HUH........................
    • Speechless  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      Why is it that commuters have to absorb these fare increase? Seemed so ironic when these transport companies announced profits/gains but eventually unable to bear their operation costs... In the first place, it is their poor planning and strategies that resulted to our sufferings.... Can't help but keep thinking: "Where have all those money gone to....??? Why do they have no money to bear these costs???"
    • RED LIZARD  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      "Teo maintained that the fare formula used by the Public Transport Council (PTC), which approves fare adjustments, is not impacted by the government's move to finance the purchase of the rest of the buses" - That is a big YES, COST DUE TO ADDITIONAL BUSES WILL BE PASSED ON TO COMMUTERS....
    • John  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      The only govt that does not love it's own people!Where got meaning ,man! Fark this useless govt!A big thank you to the 60farking percent of coqsuking voters that made life hell for the rest of us!
    • RED LIZARD  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      "Fares at some point will still have to be adjusted, we all know this,"
      In other words :
      "Of cos we will increase fare, you dim wit, slowly and after you short term memory forgot about the whole saga"

      "We think that what Singaporeans want is a quicker solution..."
      In other words :
      "You asked for it, so dun blame us when we raise ERP and fares due to more buses.."

      "That's why it's done in partnership with them.."
      In other words :
      "50-50% very fair, we both make money and HUAT AH!!!!!"

      "To some extent, wages and work conditions have to improve.."
      In other words :
      "Time to increase our pay for conditions to improve..."

      "But at the same time, we also need our workers to respond, to consider the fact that it's better to have a job than no job at all..."
      In other words :
      "Stop complaining, you either take it or leave it...."
    • Shine  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      Unless bus operations are going to be nationalised, why should public funds (taxpayers' money) be used towards the purchase of buses. This should be a matter for the shareholders of SBS/ SMRT to decide, should it not? This is surely an unjustified use of public funds!
    • Impkenai  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      Let's face it, SBS is a public company and they HAVE to keep on posting increased profits every year, just like other essential services providers. They have to make millions, billions every year. So even if costs drop, they have to increase fares to keep on increasing profits. They will tell commuters that 'there is no such thing as a free ride'. We are expected to save on food and pay these companies to increased their profits for us, their shareholders. No win situation.
    • kstan  •  Wuhan, China  •  3 months ago
      Reduce the current number of FTrash-shit now and there will be a lesser need for all these number of buses. And with the increase of this 800 buses or so, will come another 800 of PRC bus drivers...... WTF.....
    • Ah huat Ang  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      有没有人知道怎么入股?
      这行业稳赚不赔,很有赚头。

    Featured Blog Posts

    Blog Authors / Profiles