Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

 

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    SingaporeScene

    Presidential candidates share their toughest career decisions

    The four Presidential candidates share their toughest career decisions at a forum. (TV image)The four Presidential candidates share their toughest career decisions at a forum. (TV image)

    The four Presidential candidates shared their toughest career decisions and their experiences in mediating difficult situations at a forum aired on Tuesday.

    Dr Tan Cheng Bock, 71, Tan Jee Say, 57, Dr Tony Tan, 71, and Tan Kin Lian, 63, were speaking at a forum organised by Channel NewsAsia.

    They were interviewed by Professor Tommy Koh, chairman of the Centre for International Law at the National University of Singapore, Janadas Devan, director of the Institute of Policy Studies and Debra Soon, managing director of CNA.

    Former Member of Parliament for Ayer Rajah, Tan Cheng Bock, shared his difficulties resettling a 100-year old temple, under the direction of the Land Transport Authority.

    "It's very difficult because there's a lot of cultural elements there," said Dr Tan. When the process was over, "they even had my name engraved there to thank me for re-settling them."

    His toughest career decision was voting against the People's Action Party government on the Nominated Member of Parliament scheme in 1989 even though the whip was not lifted.

    Investment advisor Tan Jee Say drew his experiences from the corporate world.

    Faced with the "problem of acceptance" when he first joined an investment company as chief executive, Tan said he engaged with his immediate subordinate constructively and did not let personal differences interfere in the investment process.

    Likewise, he would embark on "constructive engagement" if he is elected as President, said Tan.

    Former deputy prime minister Tony Tan said he had to bring "very capable people" with "strong differences of views" together in the area of entrepreneurship.

    Different ministries have different points of view, he shared, citing the Finance Ministry which "wants to make sure that no money is ever wasted" and the Ministry of Trade and Industry which "wants to build a more viable economic ecosystem".

    Acknowledging that the differences are "not entirely resolved" today, he said, "But I think we have progressed, people are more inclined to take on enterprise."

    His toughest call was for the review, and eventual abolishment, of the Graduate Mothers Scheme in 1985 when he became Education Minister. "It was a difficult decision because it means admitting a mistake had been made," he said.

    Former NTUC Income chief Tan Kin Lian outlined how he helped people who were cheated of their money or badly treated when seeking help from relevant agencies.

    His toughest decision was to speak out for the 10,000 people affected by the Lehman Brothers' minibonds crisis.

    "My family and friends say don't get into trouble," he recalled. "It was difficult; it was popular with some people but quite unpopular with others in the establishment," he added.

    Candidates question Dr Tony Tan twice

    During the one-hour forum, the candidates also debated over the role of the President, with each having different interpretations of the role.

    They spoke on how they would use the President's moral authority to build Singapore and what they would say to leaders from China, US, India and Indonesia.

    Dr Tan Cheng Bock, noting the importance of these countries to Singapore, said he would proceed very cautiously and under the advice of the Foreign Affairs Ministry.

    Tan Jee Say said he would consult the Prime Minister and deliver a specific message to each leader, while Dr Tony Tan said he had the same message of preventing an economic crisis for all four leaders.

    Tan Kin Lian, who said he would seek advice from the government and share Singaporeans' aspirations and values, turned to Dr Tony Tan and asked, "You mentioned the things you would do. What struck me was, shouldn't that be the job of the Finance Minister?"

    "Aren't you taking the executive role in the office of the President?" he questioned.

    Dr Tony Tan replied: "I am absolutely not. The President does not make decisions. The Prime Minister and Cabinet makes the decisions but the President, who has the background and the experience I think has the responsibility to warn, to give his views."

    "But it is up to the Prime Minister to decide what to do. I think it is very clear in the Constitution (what) is the responsibility of the President, what is the responsibility of the Prime Minister and the Cabinet. I see no conflict between the two," he stated.

    Earlier in the forum, Dr Tony Tan and Tan Jee Say clashed over whether the President could speak out on issues he disagreed with.

    Said Tan Jee Say, "I'm just wondering Dr Tony Tan, you've aired your views on the casino in Parliament which are contrary to the government, has that immobilised the government in any way?"

    Dr Tony Tan replied he was not President then. "As a President, I have to be very careful and I think that I'd respect the Constitution."

    "But you were the deputy prime minister," Tan Jee Say challenged.

    "The deputy PM, Mr Tan Jee Say, is different from the President," responded Dr Tony Tan.

    Last week, Dr Tony Tan and Tan Jee Say clashed over the Internal Security Act during another forum.

     

    131 comments

    • Jeanie  •  9 months ago
      The table looks like a casino gambling table..At a glance they look like gambling.
    • lo  •  9 months ago
      ON CHOSING YOUR PRESIDENT

      By making the right choose, you have carved out a future for youself and your love ones

      It is important not to be influenced by those who ask you to vote strongly for a certain candidate. Seeking always for the answer within you if you find it difficult to decide which is the right one.

      HAPPY VOTING & GOOD HEALTH
    • lo  •  9 months ago
      25 Aug 2011

      Dear Fellow Singaporeans,

      On this coming Saturday (27 Aug) everyone of us who is eligible to vote will have to make a very important decision of his/her life to choose from one of 4 presidential candidates to serve us the people, and more importantly Singapore for the next 6 years.

      Personally I feel that each, and every of them have their bright and weak sides. As such I believe it is not a straight forward case to make up our mind.



      Since following and reading about all the 4 candidates from day one of their presidential campaign trails, I sincerely wish to give some suggestions for your consideration:-



      1. Vote for the candidate that you intuitively believe that he has leadership quality and can and will unite all Singaporeans as one people. This is crucial in nation building and facing challenges both from within our country and from the turbulent globalised world.



      2. Vote for the one that had been tested and trusted by you.



      3. Vote for the one that you believe that he has the disposition and dignity to represent Singapore as our Head of State. Such president will add vital value to Singapore.



      4. Vote for one that you believe is wise, and has deep interest in doing research of the world state of affairs and developments in political, economic, environmental and social affairs so that he can give input to the Government of the day.



      5. Last but not the least, but not the least, vote for the one that you believe that he commands the trust and respect by PM and his Ministers. I cannot emphasise more the importance of a good working relationship between 2 institutionalised centres both being voted in by the people of Singapore to serve Singaporeans, and bring Singapore to greater height, prosperity and a more secured future.



      MAY YOU MAKE A GOOD CHOICE.



      Uncle Raymond
      • Joe Public 9 months ago
        Uncle Raymond, no need to beat around the bush. In short, what is the role of the EP? To be the "check and balance" on the incumbent government. That being the case, how can we entrust this important role to a sympathiser of the current PAP regime?

        That to me, should answer the question of whom NOT to vote.
    • Joe Public  •  9 months ago
      Here's why I think Tony Tan will win: the election outcome doesn't depend on who gets the most votes. It depends on who counts the votes.

      The votes are managed and counted entirely by civil servants. And everyone knows the civil service is in the pocket of the government.

      Just look at the recent case involving HGTC and see how the PA and HDB have been treating Opposition MP's in their own wards. Need I say more?
      • Jove 9 months ago
        You are flaming the government. Better beware of what you say.
    • Joe Public  •  9 months ago
      What is the role of the EP? To be the "check and balance" on the incumbent government. That being the case, how can we entrust this important role to a sympathiser of the current PAP regime? Someone who is being openly endorsed by the PAP?

      That should answer the question of whom NOT to vote.
    • anDY nG  •  9 months ago
      My advise to TCB , TSJ , TT & TKL , whoever is elected to be our next President , do remember you are not belongs to PAP , SDP , nor any party..... You are elected by the People of Singapore , You are the People's Party !!.......Take good care of the people.
    • goh69  •  9 months ago
      I have seen negative comments on TJS:
      1. He has personal agenda
      - All 4 candidates have personal agenda, at least his personal agenda suits me.

      2. What has he done for the people in the past?
      - It is not about what he had done in the past, it is about what he is going to do.

      3. He will not be able to work peacefully with the government
      - We are not looking for a President that would work peacfully with the government, otherwise just ask Nathan to continue as president as he would be the best in doing so.
      Neither are we look for someone that work against the government for no reasons.
      But someone who is willing and daring to point out the wrongdoings of the government.
      He may not be able to stop the bad policies but he would be able to let people know about his opinion on these policies, which could affect PAP's votes in future election.

      Under PAP's rule, many people have been conditioned that we should be peaceful in everyway, even when we feel that we are not treated fairly or suppressed, no demonstration no protest, that is why Singaporeans are very good at verbal complaints (mostly not in the open) because that is the only outlet. How often could we get someone vocal like TJS that dares to speak up opening? Even on ISA under national camera?
      I respect him for that alone. Just compare what the other 3 says (or keep silence).
      • Jove 9 months ago
        To me, it doesn't matter how much the president dares to speak up, but the quality of his speech. Always opposing the PAP only creates trouble in formulating and implementing policies, especially his opposition is for nothing but opposing.

        Anyone observant enough can tell that
    • VisVis  •  9 months ago
      We like to see a handover of account of asset to the new EP and if there non accounted ones Nathan have to be accountable for it. please show your report as you are a EP so have to account for all things n report of what in there the last decade .....
    • VisVis  •  9 months ago
      does the computer have enough digits to cater to the billions or trillions in reserve till todate ?
    • VisVis  •  9 months ago
      does the working area of a EP have a big enough monitor to monitor all stat board or MOF transfer of $ to reserve n all things ? if there non how to monitor or do checks n balance ?
    • VisVis  •  9 months ago
      auditor have check all stat board there lots of stagnant account that flooded with cash reserve in all stat board isnt all this $ have to be transfer to MOF n bank in as reserve ?
    • VisVis  •  9 months ago
      60s -70s you have a chance b4 to change for the better but have they do the change and why not if their health n memory failing so what if they have vast exprience that was in the past , have they make life better for singaporean when they are in the ruling party or subsidy or stat board ?
    • Martin W  •  9 months ago
      stop downgrading tjs.. unless u have the balls to stand out to fight this against the odd position. i know tt is experience, but if we vote for him, life will be the same again n one day all of us may end up working for PaP as they use public to compete with local citizen n increase everything to pay their expenses. n democracy became Emperor-cy...
    • mutucurry  •  9 months ago
      It was a very interesting forum showing up the weaknesses of all four candidates including the idiosyncrasis of Dr Tony Tan who is ever ready to threaten substly about the bad global economy climate and vulnerability of Singapore against such a backdrop.

      It is a sad day for Singapore that no better man is prepared and has step forward to run against this four hopeful. A sad day indeed for Singapore.
      • Yeon 9 months ago
        can you?
      • Mike 9 months ago
        TT is stating the facts. Its idiosyncrasies to make such low comment without knowing what's knowing what's happening in the World.
      • Jeff 9 months ago
        @Mutu, weird comment. "It is a sad day for Singapore that no better man is prepared and has step forward to run against this four hopeful."

        It is a 4-horse race and you asked why not a 5-horse race. If it is 10-horse race, you will ask why not a 11-horse race.

        These hopefuls are of Presidential material...choose 1...what so sad about it? Who do you have in mind? It would be an honour to know this hidden talent and netizens should beg him/her to be the head of Singapore.
    • Andrew  •  9 months ago
      Admitting a mistake over a small segment of population ( Graduate Mothers) is already so difficult for TT, how about issue that affect the whole Singaporean? Does he has the moral & impartial judgement to act for the good of Singapore before the Constitution? There are too much baggage for him as the role of president, considering his relationship with the ruling party.
      • Vasko Dagama 9 months ago
        Well said.
        Vote for Change.
        Vote for Tan Jee Say.
      • zekky 9 months ago
        We need a man with ball of steel to challange ther gov....if not all will suffer especially the middle and low income...in another words the majority.
    • John Tan  •  9 months ago
      I am neutral so far, but just an analysis.

      TKL: Seems nice, charitable, but does he have what it takes to be a president? Couldn't answer questions at the debate well. How is he going to face other representatives in foreign countries?

      TCB: Managed to answer the questions, but a little to quiet, doesn't seem to be able to voice out his own opinion. But a candidate to be considered.

      TJS: Could answer the debate questions, but should he really be the president? The future president has to work with the government, not oppose it left right and centre. Sure, he can and should voice his views and opinions but he is too aggressive and willing to fight it out to get what he wants. If elected, he would cause an uproar in the government. He opposes for the sake of opposing. Does he really represent all singaporeans? I'm sure singaporeans want a president to be the voice of people but not someone who is too aggresive and end up fighting with the government. In my opinion if he is elected into office, singapore would end up like other countries, e.g taiwan where the country is divided. Singapore being such a small country has to remain united to stand up against others and we cannot afford to be divided. TJS should be an MP and not the president.

      TT: Has past experiences in the government sector. We shouldn't judge him just because he was from the PAP. He may have made mistakes in the past but he's human too. All humans make mistakes/wrong decisions. Give him a chance to show himself and if he fails he'll be kicked out in the next election. We can't deny that he is not a suitable candidate given his knowledge and experience. I must say he is another candidate we should consider.

      To all singaporeans, don't vote just to oppose PAP. Afterall, the president is mainly ceremonial and main decisions are made by the PM. The candidates can promise you many things now, but would they be able to carry out their promises? The president has little power as we all know. Sure, PAP has made many wrong decisions such as bringing in many foreign workers, but we cannot deny that they have also done alot to bring the country forward. Give PAP a chance to prove themselves, you still have a chance to remove them in the next GE.
      Remember, vote wisely.
    • Aaron  •  9 months ago
      This is my personal opinion and concern.

      "I am absolutely not. The President does not make decisions. The Prime Minister and Cabinet makes the decisions but the President, who has the background and the experience I think has the responsibility to warn, to give his views."

      Personally, this is a sign that he will listen and only give opinions. That means even if he voice concern of the common people, he will just say for the sake of saying and can't have a stand? A leader should have a stand and make wise decisions for the peace and prosperity of the people.
      In ancient history, only a puppet leader, whether king or emperor, will give views and cannot make decisions.
    • Gladiolus  •  9 months ago
      TJS again shows a complete lack of understanding between the role of the cabinet (in this case the DPM) and that of the President, Can we afford such a person as our President. It would reflect badly on our maturity as rational voters.
    • Why  •  9 months ago
      I support TT all the way
    • Why  •  9 months ago
      Tony Tan, you're the best!

    Featured Blog Posts

    Blog Authors / Profiles