Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

 

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    SingaporeScene

    Scholarships should be based on merit, not nationality: Baey

    Tampines MP Baey Yam Keng shared his thoughts on the online backlash that ensued from comments he made to a local newspaper this week. (Photo courtesy of PwC LLP)Tampines MP Baey Yam Keng shared his thoughts on the online backlash that ensued from comments he made to a local …

    [UPDATE on 24 Feb at 3:40pm - adding Baey's clarification on scholarships]

    No matter where a scholarship comes from, nationality should not factor into the decision of who receives it, says Member of Parliament (MP) for Tampines GRC Baey Yam Keng.

    "Whether they are a GLC (government-linked company), the government or a private company, they all want good people to work for them," he told Yahoo! Singapore in an interview on Thursday.

    He said that a scholarship should be awarded based on meritocracy, and should not be allocated specifically to locals or foreigners.

    "If a local is as good or better than the foreigner, I think the local should get it. It shouldn't be because I want a foreigner, therefore I will settle for (a candidate with) a lower standard… because ultimately people want good talents, so the nationality should not be an issue at all," he added.

    Baey was speaking in reference to scholarships that are currently awarded to both locals and foreigners, making the point that priority should not be given to recipients based on nationality, but on merit, as a culmination of several factors including character, integrity and leadership qualities. He also said that once awarded, scholarships should (and most do) carry conditions governing conduct, results and contributions to Singapore during and post study.

    He also clarified that government scholarships, such as those awarded by the Public Service Commission, that are intended for Singaporeans only, should remain that way.

    Comments to media sparked online backlash

    Baey was at the receiving end of a wave of online furore over the past two days following his comments in Wednesday's The New Paper on a Chinese scholar studying here who made the "There are more dogs than people in Singapore" remark on his web blog.

    After almost 40 posts attacking him were posted on his fan page wall, Baey published a transcript of what he said to the newspaper over a phone interview, where he explained that Singaporeans should not jump to conclusions over the comment the student, Sun Xu, had made.

    The note he posted on his Facebook profile and shared on his fan page attracted almost 350 comments, some of which were positive but most were negative sentiments from internet users, who questioned his choice of words, his statement that citizens should "reflect upon (themselves)", and even his loyalty to Singapore, among other things.

    When asked about the fiery reactions to his initial comments, Baey told Yahoo! Singapore he accepted, understood and appreciated the sentiment expressed in them.

    While several users took issue with the fact that he felt the need to deconstruct Sun's offending line while speaking to TNP, Baey said at that point he was striving to be as rational as possible about the situation.

    "I have to be accountable for what I say, whether published in the media or otherwise," he said, explaining why he published the transcript of his phone interview with the paper, with the hope of setting context to his words.

    "I thought at the time, let's not jump to conclusions. Yes, certain words can be hurtful but let's not punish (the whole community because of) one person… we shouldn't just pick on one word (or phrase) and that's it, condemn the person for life just because he's said that.

    "My point was please, let's not enlarge or expand it to say that all foreign students are bad — that's very dangerous."

    Responding to people accusing him of defending Sun's actions, Baey said, "Why should I defend him? I'm just asking for us to take a step back and cool down, rather than just reacting on impulse."

    'A big lesson in my political career'

    When asked whether he would have said anything differently on hindsight, Baey said he still stands by his views, as well as his intentions, although he is more mindful of how people might read into the things he says.

    "There's a lot of learning I have done from this… it's a big lesson for me in my political life—in fact, I would say my whole career so far," he said.

    "But to me, I still do what I think is right, and will do my best serving people in my constituency, the country and the society," he added.

    Acknowledging the threats on his Facebook page of him losing his voters in 2016, Baey said, "Ultimately I think I want people to judge me over a longer period of time. It's a lot more about what I do and what I say. Look at me as a person, what my values and views are, and whether they are consistent… so I'm taking it in my stride; I cannot let (the incident) hamper what I need to do in the constituency because I shouldn't.

    "I will still make my own judgement and do what I think is right, and I hope people will understand that and give me the opportunity to do so."

     
    • Jkhh  •  3 months ago
      Baey is like a typical PAP chap who is more interested to do what he thinks is right and not what the ppl want. He could likely be one who would not listen to us just like the other PAP chaps and force their policies down our throats when he become a minister. We shd stop the PAP of getting more votes by voting more opp.
      • Please Lah 3 months ago
        I have to disagree. I think in this case, he's wrong but he thinks he is right. Why? Because in the real world, you can very rarely find 2 equal situations where you say "all things else being equal, the Singaporean will be preferred."

        Get real Baey! Does these foreign scholars even go through the same education system right from beginning? No! In fact, graduates from a certain Asean country - many of them are a joke - I have personally spoken to many of them and I can tell you, you will begin to wonder how they even get into our varsity's Master's and Phd programs to begin with. And when you look at their course supervisors and professors in university, oh gosh they are also from the same country!!!

        Why and how is this allowed??!!! By coincidence? Theoretically speaking, one can buy their way through the Phd and I won't be surprised that's actually happening because many of these post-graduates just can't make it. But they get a straight shot at our Masters program because they graduated from their poly/university back home with flying colours - and the country is known for rampant corruption.

        How are we screening scholars in the first place?? How tight are the screening processes to ensure we really end up with the real deal? Have they been reviewed thoroughly for possible abuses? And that is just the tip - for without EQ, what is meritocracy?

        So before you open your mouth and talk about meritocracy, get real and get on the ground.... otherwise it just confirms you're living in your ivory tower.
      • Tan 3 months ago
        dear please lah, i realised this yesterday at another forum. I asked how many ft professor are teaching in singapore and how many scholarships are given to ft against how many to singaporeans. ft should not be given scholarship at all. let their own garment give them the scholarship. that's basic.
      • Melu 3 months ago
        Yes, vote him out in 2016
    • Commoner  •  3 months ago
      GRC system should be abolished. This system has allowed some MPs to be elected who would not have othewise gained excess to parliament based on their own merits.
      • Loh 3 months ago
        Best use for this case. He must do some self reflection. Tampines residents, seems like you all get another MP that doesn't care for your needs again. Time for a change.
      • Jia 3 months ago
        @commoner,
        if GRC is abolished, it could end up pretty ugly for the likes of TPL.
      • Tom 3 months ago
        GRC would never be abolished so long as PAP is stil in power. Vote opp to abolish GRC system
    • Jkhh  •  3 months ago
      Just like Baey said do what is right ie vote out PAP in 2016
      • Elizabeth 3 months ago
        Yes, 2016, I will not vote for PAP....
      • Bags 3 months ago
        Feeling sad to be true blue singaporean, feeling sad for our next generation of singaporeans
      • dr_maurice 3 months ago
        'Dog we are..so dog it is.' Singaporeans may not have the fangs BUT we can still give a NASTY BITE come 2016.
    • Armorboot  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      I would like to rebut your statement, or at least share what I know, on my understanding. Dear sir, pls take note that these scholars' ship are NOT given in merit but INVITATION throughout the whole of China, as long as their result are average and above, they are invited, this is what THEY told me. Not just that, most DON'T even know where is Singapore when they were being invited. As for their results, I can't say they are particularly good, just about the average which there are MORE Singaporeans better than them. Based on merit? Merit of what? And also, being a scholar is NOT just about the academic result, but also personality, behavior, & INTEGRITY .... ah, I'm wasting time, PAP definition for Integrity is NO $$$ = NO Integrity .....
      • PAN 3 months ago
        You R right, man! I would know because I know their mentality as I have been working in China for the past 27 years. I work there as SG did not give me the opportunity to earn a good salary.
      • George 3 months ago
        Lick lick lick...... are you the last-minute replacement last election due to your good team mate behaviour. Want to make more publicity from Yahoo! huh??
      • Good 2 months ago
        no wonder a lot of good Singaporean students including one in our family being rejected to study in university here even with our own pocket money..
    • Mark  •  3 months ago
      Please click the like, if you wish him to be replaced!
    • Chin Tu Lang  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      Nabeh, if Singapore is attacked by enemies, who should defend this little red dot. So holding a PINK I/C or RED passport mean nothing to this gahment.

      Singaporeans must come first regardless and I definitely do not believe our top students grade are no better than other nationality. Merit my foot!!!
      • Tan 3 months ago
        to byp, nabaey nabaey nabaey
      • whymeNB 3 months ago
        SORRY PINK IC GO AND FIGHT AND DIE..

        FT RUNS BACK TO THEIR OWN COUNTRY.

        we cannot even run back to sentosa...
      • liky 3 months ago
        Merit my foot
    • Justfan  •  3 months ago
      In the same Tampines GRC, one MBT is already bad enough, on how he screwed up the HDB and now we have the BYK which is even worse. Who is next??????
    • Jimmy  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      Baey, we the residents of Tampines would remember what u said and in 2016 we will vote u out.
    • No more Fa  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      You talk too much but no work done and you have not done anything yet to proof how you can contribute to Singaporeans. Voting should be based on performance ( work done ) and not talking nonsense.... A big lesson for me on Polling Day ( 2016 ) ..... I do not want you in Tampines GRC, go feed the stray dogs and get bitten!!!
    • A Yahoo! User  •  Hong Kong, Hong Kong  •  3 months ago
      so why do i do national service and pay so much in income tax? so that foreigners get the scholarship and not my children? on top of that my children has to do NS to protect SG so that foreigners have a nice and safe place to study abnd work in? I think Baey need to put himself in the common people's shoe to calibrate his ideal.
    • Jkhh  •  3 months ago
      Based on what Baey said, he seem to justify that many scholarships r given to foreigners cos singaporens lack the merits that these foreigners hv and that is y we lose out to these foreigners. That also means that singapore PAP govt is putting merits before the singaporeans ie not putting singaporeans first as what PAP claims that they always put singaporeans as the first priority . Dont forget the scholars may be just exam smart and there must be other means of selecting scholars. I believe that most scholarships shd be given to singaporeans based on the singapopreans' merits if the scholarship is paid by singaporeans. Singaporeans r like a family and Y shd we sponsor others outside the family to study and live here when at this moment we only know that these scholars r only exam smart.
    • StoRm  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      They said not enough doctors for our hospitals in SG because many who went overseas to study medical don't come back...duhz...why? Because not enough places in local unis to take in local? Or academic results weren't good enough for a place? For elites only? Comon'...if chances were given to those who went overseas, they wouldn't resorts to go overseas and don't come back!
    • SGGuard  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      Recently happened in SG, 60 yrs old auntie kena slap by foreigner, senior citizen cabby kena whack by foreigner, S'poreans are label as dog by foreigner who is sponsored by SG taxpayers fund, now even PAP MP is happy to be labelled as dog, so HOW LONG ARE S'POREANs going to take such abuses ??? Lucky I belong to the 40% who are still human enough to reject such insults & protect my dignity.
    • robin  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      Singapore having very small population. If we ever open widely to the world, those so call top talent people, they CAN FILL UP THE WHOLE SINGAPORE POPULATION. So where to our children stands? maybe ALL our future children can will find themselve useful in the labour industry..We did our NS, Reservist, paying tax and school fee. Foreigner getting free education + allowance + no NS or reservist..........Stupid. You are selling our country.. Traitor!!!!
    • Freedom Prevail!  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      This country is screwed!
    • Lydia  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      Scholarships should be based on merit correct but why not based on nationality? if I donate money to sponsor someone, i would want to groom my own citizen's first. What the heck are you talking about mr. baey? the only other animal i know that bays like you is a donkey.
    • An Aljunied Resident  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      BYK is not sensitive to the feelings of Singaporeans despite such a strong signal after the GE and PE last year.
    • Law  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      I heard one Foreign "Thrash saying".. " S'porean males need to serve NS to protect S'pore and the foreigners living inside there..Hahaha..while we happily snatch your jobs and women away". I straight away gave him a verbal diahorrea..aka CNNB CCB, FO U LP Sissy..not happy We One by One Now!...and you guess what? that scumbag said nothing and dare not even look me in the eye! Well, I am not saying all foreigners are like this but please respect the locals when you are living amongst them and likewise we do the same!
    • HushMonkey  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      Who is the real dog here Baey? Who is the one licking his master's feet?? It just goes to show that Singapore politicians are more concerned about financial gains rather than the good of their own people. Shame on you. No respect to people like you. I can't believe i'm paying tax to finance foreign students/trash to study here.
    • Jkhh  •  3 months ago
      Baey, Would u say the same thing if your son or daughter is the one who lose out to the foreigners to get a scholarship?

    Featured Blog Posts

    Blog Authors / Profiles