Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

 

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    SingaporeScene

    Tan Cheng Bock won’t pledge to donate pay because…

    Former PAP MP Dr Tan Cheng Bock said he will not make a pledge to donate part of the presidential salary to charity, …

    Pledging to donate part of the Presidential salary if elected could be akin to buying people's vote, believes Presidential hopeful Dr Tan Cheng Bock.

    That is why the 71-year-old said on Friday he will not make promises to donate his pay to charity if voted in as the next President.

    Speaking to reporters after collecting his Certificate of Eligibility on Friday, Dr Tan said that the election campaign is not the time and place for a candidate to court voters by promising them he will donate to a worthy cause.

    "If somebody tells me he will vote for me if I take a pay cut, I don't know whether I'm actually compromising on (my) principles — that is, actually, I'm buying your vote," he explained.

    "If I compromise before I become President, can you imagine when I am President? I can make many, many compromises also. In life, there are certain fundamental principles I won't concede on."

    Dr Tan, however, agreed with two other Presidential aspirants Tan Kin Lian and Tan Jee Say that the presidential salary is too high.

    The former PAP MP of Ayer Rajah constituency noted, the chairman of a private sector company is not paid much more than the chief executive. "I know the president's pay is definitely too high. I don't expect such salary," he said.

    The Government will take into consideration the "electorate's unhappiness" over the issue through the salary review committee, he added.

    In contrast is presidential hopeful Tan Kin Lian, who was the first to announce that he will give at least half the presidential salary to charity and other worthy causes if elected. He remains the only one who has made such a promise to voters.

    The former NTUC Income chief, who also collected his eligibility certificate on the same day, called on the other candidates to make a similar pledge as a demonstration of their commitment to public service.

    Tan Jee Say: disband Temasek Holdings

    Meanwhile, former civil service high-flier Tan Jee Say, who was also at the Elections Department on Friday to collect his Certificate of Eligibility, elaborated on his previous remarks that he would "disband" Temasek Holdings if elected into the country's highest office.

    He said, shares owned by Temasek Holdings in government-linked companies should be sold to encourage entrepreneurship.

    There will be no shortage of companies keen to buy out Temasek as the private sector has got "enormous experience, capacity to take over," said Tan.

    He added that the sale could be opened to both local and foreign buyers "to give Singaporeans a good deal" and that proceeds can be invested in infrastructure, especially in education and health.

    But this should be done "over a long time frame" because Temasek's stake in the Singapore economy could be almost 60 per cent, he said, noting that it "would be very drastic to disband immediately".

    "I do see disbanding as part of my economic philosophy to get the Government out of business, because it is not the business of Government to be in business," he stressed.

     

    441 comments

    • Watari  •  9 months ago
      Dr Tan Cheng Bock,

      What do you have to say about PAP providing free transport and free meal to people to attend PAP's rally during the GE. Isn't PAP buying votes?? Why didn't you say anything about this? This shows that you are a hypocrite and do not deserve our vote.
      • Rocky 9 months ago
        Basically Tan CB is still a PAP man!
        leopard won't change its spots!
      • GKS 9 months ago
        He must be PAPies backup plan.
      • Giant Lee 9 months ago
        "Pledging to Donate Part of the Presidential Salary if Elected could AKIN to Buying People's Votes" this is what TCB said. Never expect you TCB as a President Candidate to make such a STUPID STATEMENT. If Pledging to do Good Deeds for Charities if Elected is AKIN to Buying People's Votes then did you TCB make any Comments about what PAP and its Candidates did before the Previous General Election. By giving Rebates on PUB Bills, Workfare, Growth Dividents and many more just before the General Election is this not AKIN to Buying People's Votes. Do you TCB have the Courage to tell PAP that they win because they Buy People's Votes??? You TCB give us a Stupid Reason for not Willing to Help Charities and this also tell us Netizens that it will be difficult for you to Help us if you are Elected. By making this Statement, you will be losing some Votes from me and my family members.
    • Mei Yin Kee  •  9 months ago
      Singaporeans have only themselves and Singapore to fight for. And fight we must to stop this Faustian bargain that PAP has negotiated. This is not the social compact that Singaporeans' dream for. This is a nightmare that PAP has delivered: A FOREIGN DOMINATED SINGAPORE.

      Given the future scenario, TT is instrumental to another political overhaul of the presidential role. It is coming. The elected presidential role should be abolished. It is not democratically elected. It has been PAP endorsed so far. Inderjit Singh knew that TT was PAP's choice. There was no referendum for this. Nathan was just a waste of time, a waste of money, a stupid expensive ceremonial custodian of our reserves.Nathan was not competent to do the job. What does he know? He is just a journalist, a labour union guy. His claim to fame was he scratched the back of Harry Lee. It is time that PAP stop telling us who is competent.

      Again let me remind PAP that the world is not your oyster. If PAP continues on this unbridled mission of making Singapore Inc; the top 1% of China and India alone has 20 million people who are smarter than all the Tony Tans of Singapore. They will fill every single Singapore job from CEO to toilet cleaners with 15 million TTs to spare, waiting in queue to come in. This is of course an extreme example but if you were to measure PAP's policy today, we are at 75% of the situation we should cut back by at least 25% of the excesses done by PAP. Does PAP know where to draw the line and when to draw the line? I dont think so. For the last 5 years,
      Singaporeans have been made to queue behind foreign talents; yes for our own good we were made to believe.
      • Imation 9 months ago
        There are no 2 ways about it. Ever since Singapore started on the pursuit of economic affluence, there is only 1 way. UP. And the only way to keep things afloat in all economies is to bring in money in abundance and keep values up.

        How else do you expect this country to grow if not to bring/attract the talents/billionaires?. The converse is inconceivable at this juncture because back tracking now could mean a nose-dive in our economic prowess.

        The Government is stuck in a dilemma. Move forward and make this a better country by continuing the UPWARD call or shut the door and make it cheap.....eeeer....iiee.

        GREED is the culprit that's difficult to hold back.

        But if the Government can be faulted in any of these, its her inability to penalise her poor performing members amongst her midst who failed to rein in these issues before they even erupted. No doubt, there's alot of cleaning up to do but the last thing we (the people) should attempt is an overhaul that could lead inadvertently to a total collapse.
      • Eng 9 months ago
        Say what U like Mei Yin Kee, the outgoing President WILL GET $7,000+ EVERYDAY
        of PENSION until he "goes up to the clouds"
        So, another HOPEFUL will be waiting , just a month only.
        Vote lah to give a FREE Ticket to a TAN to live in Luxury and Splendour, this AUGUST.
        TCB will NOT part a cent of it.LOL!
      • A Yahoo! User 9 months ago
        Anonneh, what your are saying is "Singaporeans, you are on the back of the Tiger and you cannot get off"! Find, but PAPies will get off when things go bad. They have all bought houses in Australian, UK and the US. What do you think? Check it out in Perth, the ex-army generals who developed the plots for new housings and the beach homes!
    • Filial  •  9 months ago
      If President Nelson Mandela can reduce his salary why can't the president of Singapore do the same. President Nelson salary is not the highest pay compare to our president and all the other minister and yet he can understand the people feeling and threat his own citizen like his own family.Go and watch the show Invictus so you learn.
      • Maskot 9 months ago
        That is the reason why he is so well loved by his people.

        But some other country leaders don't care about that. They choose to be rich over loved and respect.
      • Jeff D 9 months ago
        Maskot, some would apparently even argue that being rich and feared is preferable to being loved and respected. Or so they say by their actions.
    • Thulasidas  •  9 months ago
      Yes, Torch

      agree with you . well written. thank you for sharing your ideas

      Das

      S650219

      \
      • Muru 8 months ago
        Life is a journey, travel it well
    • Native Singaporean  •  9 months ago
      Dr Tan, even before you are elected, you are already worried about requests from the people. This is the "People President" election, you need to have the heart, ear and patient to win the votes from the people. Your action is quite similar to the PAP's mentality.
      • A Yahoo! User 9 months ago
        Native Singaporean

        His action is not quite similar to the PAP's mentality. It is the PAP mentality, something which he can't shake off after so many years with them. Once a leopard, always a leopard - it's hard to shake off the spots.
    • Benjamin  •  9 months ago
      Firstly, I don't even think it's right for us to have a president. 2ndly, the pay's absurd. Lastly, is it even right that the govt runs businesses? You mean you've got that much time for it? How about using that time to improve and reflect on your dammed actions?
    • John Lim  •  9 months ago
      In the election 2011. GE ! So many SDP oppoisite party ! CRY FATHER CRY MUM ! Say donation their vote in the election ! But none even WIN !

      I believe they already lose their credit !

      We are all human who need money. But who will work best for the citizen of Singapore. Not the foriegners ?

      Be frank to yourself. We need someone who think for the people.
    • John Lim  •  9 months ago
      SDP cannot even get votes ! Because he is DR CHEE ONE ! They one who get rid of MR CHIAM !

      I will not support a PARTY that DR CHEE create and people from SDP.

      If not for worker's party or NSP. They never even get their 30% of their vote. Even less.

      SDP is just like TPL. Same kind.
    • John Lim  •  9 months ago
      Correct. SDP don't even get over 40% of the vote. Still YA YA PAPAYA. If not for worker's party support in the election. They get even lesser ! And 20% or less. I am the 40% of anti-PAP. But I will not vote TJS.
    • 55 cents  •  9 months ago
      Simple- read my lips - money not enough
    • Hum hum  •  9 months ago
      TKL has expressed that the Presidential salary is too high and will donate at least 50% of the salary to charity, if elected.

      This will set a good example for others ministers to follow.

      If we all agree that President’s salary and ministers’ pay are too high, then we should vote for TKL.
    • T  •  9 months ago
      Agree. Any candidate pledging to donate part of salary or open the Istana everday to the public or dismantling government investment arms is engaging in trading favours for votes. that's corruption on the part of the offeror (the candidate).
    • Free-Thinker  •  9 months ago
      Please can the president candidates speak in mature way... Don't keep on saying want to disband Temasek Holding or want to push for policy that will improve singaporeans life..... Please understand as a president what is your power before you commit to your citizen all this promises. When you are elected and you cannot do this and that then you push the fault to the government... come on... know the position and power that you are running for before making promise...
    • Old horse  •  9 months ago
      TCB, to be elected and serve the nation as a President is the highest honor, to donate part of the $4 million back to society and the people is an even greater honor, this will definitely not be buying votes!
    • Angmoh Kow  •  9 months ago
      I wonder if top goverment servant need to declared how much each worth after they step down from the office ?
    • IRatherNotSay  •  9 months ago
      Because he wants everything!
    • 反清复明  •  9 months ago
      Pay cut? It's the $ that all our ministers are going after. I bet they still find it too little. You think they are that keen to serve the country, my foot. Give they the pay scale of the US ministers and all of them will resign immediately. To serve the country,what a F excuse.
    • Duloso  •  9 months ago
      “President’s Pay Goes Up By 26% To $4.3 Million”
      A president pay of $4.3M is so high for a retiring job.. TCB is already 71 years.. and working a smiling President.. and getting paide $4.3M is easy retiring job.. huh..

      So scarstic.. to indirectly saying Tan JS and Tan KL is buying vote by pledging part of his salary to charity..
      but at least he is doing something.. and I support his action.

      How many past president who earn so much of tax payer money has donated this pay to charity... A highly paid retiring job that is not worth paying..like wats said inthe election..the minister and president's pay in singapore should be compared to the 1st world but not out of the world..

      There is no other country in this world where a president and minster is being paid so much for so little amount of work.. Singapore is only a 4M population countries.. how much problems can it get as compared to US of 311M population, China 1.3 Billion population and Malaysia 28M population.... and yet.. these countrie's minster and president is not even a fraction of the pay..
    • Mun Yue  •  9 months ago
      By declaring to donate part of the salary is not vote buying - the salary is obscenely high! - even with 50% donated, it is still high.

      If you declare it one day before voting, then it is more like vote buying.

      By declaring it right at the start of the race, you opened your card for people to see - people can decide.

      The people know what is this EP job is all about.

      If I am qualified for the post, I declare 75% of the salary goes to helping the poor & needy. Old people don't need that much money to live....
    • Xinkapor  •  9 months ago
      "Won't pledge" does not mean "will not pledge". When we do not like someone, everything he/she said will be twisted immediately if an opportunity arises. This is outright unfair! I believe if the honourable TCB were to be elected, he will donate part of his salary as he himself has said that the present salary of the president is indeed too high.

      What kind of profile are we looking for in a President? Talented and hourable as he is, Mr George Yeo himself has previously said that he does not possess the temperament to be a President (if I remember correctly). And here, we have four presidential hopefuls vying for the post. Who has what ----eo is talking about?

      In the past, we often heard of the popular phrase "people President", one who reaches out to all fellow Singaporeans regardless of race or religion, someone who is respected as a father figure - compassionate, caring, protective.

      From now on, every candidate will be scrutized for every word said and every movement and gesture (including handshakes). We need to read with discernment. How about one who said "it is not about PAP vs oppostion" and yet said that if elected, the profile of the opposition will be raised.

      While it is indeed difficult to remove past political affiliation (if any) from the candidates, we still would need to objectively judge each candidate on his merits. May the best man win (for Singapore)!

    Featured Blog Posts

    Blog Authors / Profiles