YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Digital film switch daunts historic movie houses

    BUFFALO, N.Y. (AP) — The license plate on movie projectionist Arnie Herdendorf's Buick is 35MM MAN, a nod to his work in the booth at the 1925 Palace Theatre, with its velvet-draped stage and chandeliered mezzanine.

    When he drove recently to a multiplex to watch as its film projectors were swapped out for new digital ones, the sight of old 35 mm workhorses "stacked up like wounded soldiers" had him wondering how long his title — or job — would be around.

    The questions are even bigger for historic movie houses themselves.

    With the future of motion pictures headed quickly toward an all-digital format played only on pricey new equipment, will the theaters be around? Or will they be done in by the digital revolution that will soon render inadequate the projectors that have flickered and ticked with a little-changed technology for more than 120 years?

    "Our guess is by the end of 2013 there won't be any film distributed anymore," said John Fithian, president and chief executive of the National Association of Theater Owners.

    The Hollywood studios' industry-wide conversion from 35 mm film to digital satisfies modern-day demands for crisp clarity, cost savings and special effects like 3-D. And for big-budget theaters where new releases occupy multiple screens, installing digital projectors is a no-brainer. Already, about 60 percent have converted in the United States, at a price of $70,000 to $80,000 a screen, Fithian said.

    But for the community-owned Palace and other small and historic movie houses, the merging of nostalgia with high-tech is a dauntingly expensive proposition. Yet one, most agree, that is critical if they are to keep attracting audiences to their light bulb-studded marquees. The cost is more than double the price of a top-of-the-line film projector.

    "The Riviera Theatre is listed on the historic register, but we are not a museum," Executive Director Frank Cannata said from the 1927 theater north of Buffalo, "so it's important that we stay current ... and staying current isn't always affordable, as we're all finding out."

    An estimated 500 to 750 historic theaters currently show movies, according to the Theatre Historical Society of America, though it adds no one has formally researched the number and the estimate is conservative.

    "This is another major threat to these theaters which were largely rescued and restored by grass-roots local efforts," said Karen Colizzi Noonan, president of the THS, which records and preserves theaters' architectural and cultural history. "It is so sad that after all that hard work and dedication these groups now face another huge challenge just to survive."

    And survival means doing whatever they can to raise the cash to convert.

    Supporters of the privately owned Davis Theatre in Higginsville, Mo., are vying for a $50,000 prize in a Reader's Digest contest that would help pay for digital equipment for the 500-seat main auditorium. They were in second place at the start of February, with a month of voting to go.

    "It's a long haul but it's encouraging to see a town come together," said Fran Schwarzer, who, with her husband, George, was nearing retirement age and sunk their savings into buying the 1934 theater to keep it from closing in 1998.

    The couple added three screens in 2005 so they could show more first-run movies, always viewing the venture as more community service than money-maker in the small town east of Kansas City.

    "If we had known then what we know now" about the swift onset of digital, "we would never have gone into debt more to put in three more auditoriums," Schwarzer said.

    The Riviera will show movies with its two carbon arc lamphouses and projectors for as long as it can, Cannata said, while exploring funding for the digital replacements. If it can't, it will have to do away with the popular second-run movies offered at discount rates.

    While live shows and other programming would keep the Riviera going, other theaters are trying to stave off closing with fundraisers, like the taco supper planned to raise money for the Onarga Theater in eastern Illinois. The 1937 theater that boasts being the first south of Chicago to show movies with sound has invested in its seating, concessions and sound systems in recent years, but can't afford the switch to digital projection.

    North of Buffalo, the nonprofit, community-owned Palace is looking into loans and grants for a $75,000 digital set up, but it's also going to have to upgrade its electrical system to accommodate the new equipment, said Phil Czarnecki, vice president of the board. He can't help but think of all the restoration of the building — a replica of the Paramount Theater in New York City that mixes Art Deco and Italian Renaissance style — that could be accomplished with such an outlay.

    The small theaters already are feeling pressure from the digital conversions taking place all around them. Instead of waiting three weeks for a modern multiplex to make a movie print available, it now often takes six or seven weeks because there are fewer 35 mm copies in circulation. That's more than enough time for the pool of potential ticket-buyers to lose interest or see the movie somewhere else.

    It's not just the cost of digital projection that concerns Edward Summer, president of the Buffalo Niagara Film Festival. He worries that once older movie houses make the switch, they'll do away with their 35 mm projectors, something he says would be "a hideous mistake."

    Summer sees a potential tourism niche in historic theaters showing classic movies — and he worries that existing films that won't be digitized will be forever lost to audiences if the equipment isn't there to show them.

    "Every motion picture made between 1894 and right this minute is on 35 mm film and those films not only still exist, but those film prints are the only way to see them," Summer said.

    "It's not either/or," Summer said of the two projection technologies, "it's both/and."

    The Palace's Herdendorf doesn't own a computer and isn't sure if his 17 years of splicing and dicing reels of film and threading them through a platter projection system will translate to the new technology with its pocket-size hard drives. He knows what to do if film breaks, but not if a computer freezes.

    The Riviera eventually plans to display one of its 35 mm carbon arc projectors in the lobby, Cannata said, "so people can take a look at how films were shown at one time."

    The Davis Theatre's Schwarzer jokes that her place's four projectors will become boat anchors. What's important, she said, is that the theater's doors stay open.

    "We have such wonderful memories of this theater as children," she said. "You kind of like to think that kids that come now will have some of those memories, too."

    How do you feel about this article?

     

    27 comments

    • Eric1  •  3 months ago
      Movie theaters these days are crap anyways. Tiny screens and filthy facilities with popcorn selling for ridiculous amounts of money! I used to LOVE going to the movies when they had HUGE screens and 70 mm film with Dolby... Now THAT was good! The first time I saw 'Star Wars' it was in one of those theaters in Boston, and I was quite simply BLOWN AWAY! Not likely to ever see anything like THAT again!
    • Al  •  Intercourse, United States  •  3 months ago
      This means the end of the drive-in movie.
      • Peter 3 months ago
        good point, never thought about that
      • Mr Ed 3 months ago
        Drive-in's have been pretty much "dead" for about 20 years now.
      • bruce-o 3 months ago
        Still have a drive-in here in Reno, it's a kick to go to. The rest of the country is missing out on a lot
    • Yours Truly  •  Tampa, United States  •  3 months ago
      Turn off the darn cell phones!!!!!!!
    • PhilosopherJay  •  Orlando, United States  •  3 months ago
      The experience of movie-going is certainly changing rapidly. I remember seeing movies on huge screens at Radio City Music Hall and other theaters in New York in the 1960's before the multiplexes. It was almost a supernatural experience. Now the screens are only 1/5th that size and the experience isn't much difference from watching a large screen television. The only unusual experience are 3D movies, but those hurt the eyes and cause headaches.
    • grendel  •  Copperas Cove, United States  •  3 months ago
      and my wife wonders why I keep recording as many older movies from the '20's and '30's as I can. while they're still available.
    • daisy.andconfused  •  3 months ago
      Personally I adore going to the cinema and seeing films in 35mm. If I want to see something in "crisp clarity" I will just buy the #$%$ blu-ray.
      • Jeremy 3 months ago
        Yeah, who wants to watch a moview that is blurry and sounds like crap!
      • daisy.andconfused 3 months ago
        Not my point.
    • JamesG  •  San Antonio, United States  •  3 months ago
      This forced conversion is also hurting small town "mom and pop" operations, as well as arthouses, revival theatres and second run houses. The suits in Hollywood found out how much money they can make off of 3D and now everyone has to follow or you don't get the latest 2D blockbusters. The equipment is costly and the studios charge as much (and sometimes more) for the digital "print" as they do for a 35mm print. Greed, plain and simple. It is also quite disrespectful to it's own heritage. Many of the films from the silent era were trashed to save on storage costs and the only ones that remain are not available on digital. Much like the thousands of titles that are still not available on dvd and remain on vhs only, the history of motion pictures is being dumped for the latest blockbuster that we can show in crisp digital, soulless projection. 2D digital looks like a dvd projection, bright and crisp (when the management doesn't leave the 3D filter on the lens so the booth person can get back downstairs to sell snacks quicker) but with no depth, you can the same affect at home with nice home theatre setup. Don't get me started on how crappy digital 3D projection is. Dark and muddy, with the only exceptions being Avatar (which was pretty close to being animated) and the digital made animation features.
      • this one either 3 months ago
        Well said. It cost me my job. I worked at Technicolor as a projectionist for 15 years. They closed the doors in North Hollywood, sent what film work was left to Thailand and Canada. I agree, 3D projection is lousy. Having seen the 2 compared side by side, it is not even close. You are so right, it is all about money. A 100 yr tradition is being annihilated in the name of the $$. Shameful. A friend of mine lost his theater due to this also. On Melrose and Normandie ave. He had to leave CA.
    • Sherri M  •  Chico, United States  •  3 months ago
      Going to the theatre was an event. The rich and luxurious lobbies, the mezzanines, the main theatre it self. People were dressed nicely- not fancy, just nice. The hush in the room as the lights dimmed. That initial intake of breath- waiting to see if there would be a newsreel, or a cartoon , or a clever ad for the concession stand. Then....the curtains would slowly close and then open . The lights behind you would flicker, and the magic carpet ride began. Now, it's just hundreds of people jammed in too small seats, all on their cell phones or plugged into their i-Pods, spilling food and drink on themselves, and their seatmates. The movie is just something to be ignored, to the tune of $10 a pop. What a waste.
      • Jeremy 3 months ago
        We aren't living in 1950 anymore!
      • Wynne 3 months ago
        No, we aren't, but what Sherri M described was still happening in the '80s.
    • Joe  •  New Orleans, United States  •  3 months ago
      Digital projection is lousy compared to film. Just trek off to the Star Wars revival currently and you'll see. What a shame that the movies are now becoming merely a baby sitter for the kiddie set.
      • Naish 3 months ago
        why would anyone in their right might go see Star Wars are you on a mission to give Lucas more money for that crap movie?
      • Joe 3 months ago
        Naish, I thumbsed-you-up on your comment to me because you are absolutely right!! I got what I deserved.
      • Naish 3 months ago
        Joe thanks for your great sense of humor, your prize will be you get to view Journey to the Seventh Planet - Directed by Sidney Pink enjoy
    • Warrior-Woman  •  New York, United States  •  3 months ago
      So sad. Going to see a movie in one of these historic houses is such a wonderful experience, in comparison with the sticky-floored multiplexes.
    • claire  •  New Orleans, United States  •  3 months ago
      The final nail in the coffin for the few remaining neighborhood movie theaters.
    • Wynne  •  Frazier Park, United States  •  3 months ago
      I think the digital movie-making world is going to find out what Todd-AO found out years ago in the digital audio world: it's just plain ol' tiring to watch and listen to for any length of time. Our senses are analog and always will be. It's kind of like fitting square pixels/sound bits into round holes (eyes, ears): Don't fit.

      I'm not saying that the medium changing is bad; it's inevitable. But to me it's sad that the richness and depth of film is being replaced with digital sensors that have yet to faithfully reproduce natural colors, in the movie and still photography worlds.
    • linda  •  Lockport, United States  •  3 months ago
      This theater is actually in Lockport New York on East Ave. and is truly beautiful..it reminds you of days long ago
    • Paul  •  3 months ago
      Digital is cheap by today's standards. Why is this equipment so expensive? Who is making the huge profits? If hollywood is forcing the change then they should be responsible for making the transition as inexpensive as possible.
    • TOO OLD  •  3 months ago
      Ah, yes. I remember the old Simplex projectors. Striking an arc. Amazing how fast you could splice film. Got your exercise hauling film cans up and down the stairs to the booth. No cell phones. People with manners. Those were the days.
    • Ronald W  •  3 months ago
      For years there will be a niche for these beautiful classic old theaters. Upscale food, spacious seats and tables may be the way to go. People would pay for an upscale classic experience. If I could have a cocktail, a decent bite and a table I would pay top dollar.
    • Randolph  •  Salem, United States  •  3 months ago
      Just play classic movies. I wouldn't mind seeing Forbidden Planet in the theater.
    • Kathy  •  Barto, United States  •  3 months ago
      A good deal of the money Hollywood makes comes from overseas revenue. Many/most theaters overseas haven't bought new digital equipment. How are the studios going to handle that problem?
    • Bob  •  Kansas City, United States  •  3 months ago
      The community and privately-owned theaters will have to do fund raisers and advertise that if they don't upgrade they will probably cease to exist. Those that like going will help as much as they can.
    • Jack  •  3 months ago
      ""Every motion picture made between 1894 and right this minute is on 35 mm film and...those film prints are the only way to see them," Summer said."

      Either that's the silliest statement ever made or Mr. Summers was seriously misquoted.

    Featured Blog Posts