YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Jackson's 'Hobbit' doubles film speed to 48 frames

    PARK CITY, Utah (AP) — Peter Jackson is making his hobbits and dwarves march double-time in his "The Lord of the Rings" prequel, which he's shooting in a faster film speed than the Hollywood standard.

    Jackson hopes the 48-frames-a-second rate — twice the 24 frames that has been the custom since the 1920s — will help bring about a gradual transition to faster speeds that can bring more life-like images and action to the screen.

    Digital cameras allow for shooting at 48 frames or faster, reducing the blurry effect known as strobing that can come with 24-frame filming.

    Jackson said he hopes there will be a fair number of theaters equipped with digital projectors that can handle the faster film speeds by December, when Warner Bros. will release "The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey," the first chapter in his two-part adaptation of J.R.R. Tolkien's fantasy classic.

    "You shoot at 48, project at 48 and you get an illusion of life that's remarkable. You don't realize just how strobing and how flickery 24 frames is," Jackson said at the Sundance Film Festival, where he presented the documentary "West of Memphis," produced by him and his wife, "Hobbit" co-writer Fran Walsh. "You look at something at 48 frames, and it looks gorgeous. It looks like real life. It's amazing."

    Other digital pioneers are making the same push for higher film speeds. "Avatar" creator James Cameron has said he will shoot the sequel to his science-fiction blockbuster at 48 or 60 frames a second.

    At the CinemaCon convention for theater owners in Las Vegas last March, Cameron showed footage he shot at 24, 48 and 60 frames a second. The faster speeds noticeably reduced or eliminated blurriness in action sequences or when the camera panned and dollied down the length of a crowded banquet table.

    As Hollywood moved into the digital age, movie makers generally have stuck with the 24-frame speed at which celluloid film moves through cameras and projectors. "The Hobbit" will show that it's an outdated way to shoot films, Jackson said.

    "I'm hoping it'll be just the first gentle step into changing film rates because we can change them, especially with all the digital technology now," Jackson said. "Twenty-four is irrelevant. It doesn't mean anything anymore. It's just a traditional thing. It's far from the best visual way to present a film."

    "The Hobbit" has had a hard road to the screen after Jackson's blockbuster "Lord of the Rings" trilogy," whose 2003 finale, "The Return of the King," swept the Academy Awards with 11 trophies, including best picture and director.

    Jackson planned only to co-write and co-produce "The Hobbit," but he stepped in to direct after Guillermo del Toro dropped out because of delays caused by the bankruptcy of MGM, which owned half of the project.

    "It's actually been a reasonably joyous thing to do," said Walsh, who returned as a co-writer and co-producer. "I'm surprised to say that because I thought it would be very hard. Certainly, it was a difficult birth of this film. It was protracted and fought. ... But it's surprisingly pleasant, if I can use that word. Pleasant. So far. So I hope I haven't jinxed it."

    The two films are being shot simultaneously in 3-D, with the second one, "The Hobbit: There and Back Again," due in theaters in December 2013.

    British actor Martin Freeman stars as Bilbo Baggins, the hobbit who acquires the evil ring that sets the action of "The Lord of the Rings" in motion. Cast members returning from that trilogy include Ian McKellen, Elijah Wood, Cate Blanchett, Orlando Bloom, Ian Holm, Christopher Lee, Hugo Weaving and Andy Serkis.

    Jackson joked that the snowy mountains surrounding Sundance's home in the ski resort of Park City remind him of the heavy workload still ahead on "The Hobbit."

    "We have a hundred days of shooting to go, which still feels like we're at the bottom of a mountain. I kind of don't like being in Park City because I look up the mountain, and I kind of think, well, 'The Hobbit's' at the top of that mountain. I've got to kind of climb this. It looks pretty daunting," Jackson said.

    Yet Jackson said he's having a great time revisiting Tolkien's Middle-earth.

    "If I show up at work every day happy to be there and excited about what we're shooting, to me, that's always a good sign," he said. "So I think we're making a couple of pretty entertaining movies."

    ___

    Warner Bros. is a unit of Time Warner Inc.

    How do you feel about this article?

     
    • Rich  •  Morristown, United States  •  4 months ago
      I'm hoping to eat 48 Milk Duds per second when I go to see this movie.
      • frenchman 4 months ago
        bwahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!
      • zilla luv 4 months ago
        48 milk duds per second??!!!?? I've told you a million times not to exaggerate!
      • The_Donger 4 months ago
        HAHHAA...That's alot of milkduds
    • christian  •  Seattle, United States  •  4 months ago
      I highly recommend you see his early films, Bad Taste, Meet the Feebles, Brain Dead (Dead Alive in the US), Forgotten Silver, Heavenly Creatures and The Frighteners.
      • Billy 4 months ago
        all very good movies, see the classics folks.
      • Hank Scorpio 4 months ago
        Dead Alive is soooo nasty, not saying its bad. The Frighteners is a great movie.
      • Amedeo 4 months ago
        Heavenly Creatures with Kate Winslet, great movie.
    • JMLM  •  Omaha, United States  •  4 months ago
      Looking forward to the Hobbit.
    • TJD  •  4 months ago
      You had me at "Hobbit"!
      • christy V 4 months ago
        Haha funny one! Love it!
      • Blackadda 4 months ago
        Personally I don't like watching 3D. Art has different mediums (oil, watercolour, pen and ink etc) and each expressed a different mood. I feel the same about movies, different tones, lighting etc convey different moods.
    • Geoff  •  4 months ago
      The Hobbit will be a fantastic addition to the already classic book, and I will be there to see both movies when they are released. Now...for a more adventurous effort, why can't someone do a film version of The Silmarillion as a prequel for all prequels?
      • Star 4 months ago
        I think the Silmarillion is too disjointed and hops around too much to be a good film. Although, I suppose you could just pick one or two of the joining stories and expand them. Not sure how you'd do the complete book, though, as it's really many shorter stories just thrown together. Interesting idea, though...if anyone could pull it off, it would be Jackson!
      • Matthew 4 months ago
        ^Agreed. The Sil is Wagnerian in scope, micro (Narn i Hin Hurin) and macro (Akallabeth). It would take several movies to do it right--but then again, I'm of the opinion that each "book" of LOTR (there were two sections for each volume) should have had it's own movie to keep the storyline and characters flowing right...
      • DavidL 4 months ago
        Sure, why not, they can bring back Ian McKellen, Elijah Wood, Cate Blanchett, Orlando Bloom, Ian Holm, Christopher Lee, Hugo Weaving and Andy Serkis for that movie too.
    • shiloh2020  •  4 months ago
      I love you man....Your work on all of Tolkien's stuff makes waiting for the Messiah all the more worthwhile. I just love what you do....Thanx.
    • 1540  •  4 months ago
      And the price of a movie doubles.
      • A Yahoo! User 4 months ago
        hilarious
      • regular ndn 4 months ago
        No..a dollar per frame...lol..
      • Maaack 4 months ago
        At least it would be a performance related increase in cost.
        For years we have been paying more for the same product.
    • StevenD  •  St Louis, United States  •  4 months ago
      Video games have used 60 fps as a standard for years.
    • A Yahoo! User  •  Ashland, United States  •  4 months ago
      3D is such a gimmick and it gives me a friggin headache just make it a high quality 2D film.
    • Sixpackshaker  •  4 months ago
      Shut up and take my money...
    • Jon Ford  •  4 months ago
      It's funny that the article failed to mention the fact that it took so long to produce The Hobbit not only because of MGM's bankruptcy, but also because of litigation between New Line and Tolkien's heirs over Lord of the Rings royalties. New Line had to settle with the heirs before production could begin on The Hobbit.
    • Mike  •  St Charles, United States  •  4 months ago
      Wow, twice as many frames to paint when you need to rotoscope.
    • david  •  4 months ago
      Double the frames? why not? since the first hobbit film a decade ago film prices have doubled so makes sense to me..
    • Deadmeat99  •  4 months ago
      Hope you didn't buy a 120Hz television for that silky smooth 24p Blu-Ray motion. 48fps doesn't match the 120Hz rate like 24fps does so they'll judder just like the 60Hz screens do. That also goes for those snazzy new 600hz plasmas. Only the 240Hz televisions will be able to display it without judder.
    • Richard  •  Norfolk, United States  •  4 months ago
      if they have been doing it since the 20's it's time to change.
    • Jaik  •  4 months ago
      hope they take their time and get it right
    • Hairy Ellis  •  4 months ago
      Finally, good movies back at the ole cinema. Count me in, sir!
    • Habakkuk  •  4 months ago
      Bring it on, Jackson! I am having Middle Earth Withdrawal Syndrome over here.
    • David  •  Kalamazoo, United States  •  4 months ago
      I hope they decide on a standard for this, so theaters don't have to keep buying new projection equipment.
    • Intelligentdare  •  New York, United States  •  4 months ago
      can't wait, this movie will be a classic

    Featured Blog Posts