YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Pakistan denies hidden agenda, Taliban deny talks

    Pakistan Wednesday rejected accusations that it was secretly supporting Taliban insurgents in Afghanistan, while the Taliban denied plans for peace talks with the Afghan government in Saudi Arabia.

    The statements came as a leaked NATO report charged that Pakistan's security services were backing the Taliban militia, who consider victory inevitable once Western combat troops leave in 2014.

    The leak was spectacularly bad timing for Pakistan's Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar, who was in Kabul for the first time since taking office last year in a bid to thaw frosty ties between the two neighbours.

    "We have no hidden agenda in Afghanistan," Khar told reporters after meeting President Hamid Karzai. "These claims have been made many, many times. Pakistan stands behind any initiative that the Afghan government takes for peace."

    The Taliban chose the same day to deny that they would soon hold talks with Karzai's government in Saudi Arabia to end the decade-long war since they were toppled by a US-led invasion in 2001.

    "There is no truth in these published reports saying that the delegation of the Islamic Emirate would meet with representatives of the Karzai government in Saudi Arabia in the near future," the Taliban said on their website.

    Afghan officials had suggested that talks in Saudi Arabia would be in addition to contacts in Qatar between the Taliban and the United States.

    But it was never clear whether the Taliban, who have resisted talks with the Afghan government, or the Saudis, who have conditioned involvement on the Taliban renouncing Al-Qaeda, would come on board.

    Taliban negotiators have begun preliminary discussions with the United States in Qatar on plans for peace talks aimed at ending the war.

    But they said in their statement Wednesday that they had not yet "reached the negotiation phase with the US and its allies".

    "Before there are negotiations there should be a trust-building phase, which has not begun yet," the statement said.

    One of the Taliban's demands is for the United States to free five of its leaders from detention in the US military prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

    The leaked NATO report -- seen by The Times newspaper and the BBC -- was compiled from information gleaned from insurgent detainees and was given to NATO commanders in Afghanistan last month.

    The "State of the Taliban" document claims that Islamabad, via Pakistan's ISI intelligence agency, is "intimately involved" with the insurgency and that the Taliban assume victory is inevitable once Western troops leave in 2014.

    The Times quoted the report as saying the Taliban's "strength, motivation, funding and tactical proficiency remains intact", despite setbacks in 2011.

    "Many Afghans are already bracing themselves for an eventual return of the Taliban," it said.

    "Once (NATO force) ISAF is no longer a factor, Taliban consider their victory inevitable."

    NATO's International Security Assistance Force (ISAF), however, appeared to distance itself from the contents of the document.

    The document "may provide some level of representative sampling of Taliban opinions and ideals but clearly should not be used as any interpretation of campaign progress", spokesman Lieutenant Colonel Jimmie Cummings told AFP.

    NATO spokeswoman Oana Lungescu downplayed the impact of the leaked report on the eve of a two-day meeting of NATO defence ministers in Brussels.

    She said it was "basically a summary" of statements made by Taliban detainees during interrogations.

    "So it's what they think or what they would like us to believe they think," Lungescu added.

    She also responded to charges that Pakistan was secretly supporting the Taliban by saying there was "nothing new" in the allegations.

    In Washington, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton played down the leak.

    "I am obviously not going to be commenting on it. I think that there have already been comments that there's nothing new in what has been released," the chief US diplomat said.

    Pakistan's foreign minister said "we consider any threat to Afghanistan's independence and sovereignty as a threat to Pakistan's existence.

    "Pakistan and Afghanistan need to look forward to a relationship based on trust."

    Afghan Foreign Minister Zalmai Rasoul told the same news conference: "There will be no peace in the region if there is no serious regional cooperation.

    "Pakistan plays a key role in Afghan peace process. I hope Ms Rabani's visit is the beginning of a good relationship between our two countries."

    Kabul government officials declined immediate comment on the report.

    How do you feel about this article?

     

    9 comments

    • Ubaldo  •  Manila, Philippines  •  3 months ago
      The Americans must recall all nuclear capabilities they provided to Pakistan so they will suffer for their uncooperative act with their supporter. Instead of providing support to their ally they even harbored Bin Laden and the Talibans.
    • bowen  •  Iloilo City, Philippines  •  3 months ago
      Pakistan plays both sides. You can never trust these guys.
    • gerry w  •  Manila, Philippines  •  3 months ago
      the americans should send 'some good men' to centro mexico and put to sleep some ot the trouble makers there,
    • HOR  •  Centro, Mexico  •  3 months ago
      got to do something in this world, those whitefolks were after the alquida and taliban. pakistan knew there was no way out of it. might as well get the money if the americans going to be in there. it would only make sense to help your own kind, thats what the pakistanis did. if the whitefolks were going to your areas causing war cause you have oil, i think you might be feeling a sense of pride to help your own kind.
    • Don Joseph  •  Manila, Philippines  •  3 months ago
      When Americans leave Afghanistan, crooked generals and cockroach-minded billionaire politicians in Pakistan can now subdue the minerals in that country.. Do you think Islamabad loves the Americans? They were only after their dollars..
    • Lery Bird  •  Tokyo, Japan  •  3 months ago
      Any thing new? This is an open secret!
    • HOR  •  Centro, Mexico  •  3 months ago
      like to tell the middle east people, its not wether or not you win or lose the battle with the takeover troublemakin americans , its how many you take out and send them home in bodybags. good job keep blowing americans and KNOWING HALFS THE BATTLE
      • Josh 3 months ago
        and you will be the first, that is, if anything will be left of you.
    • mac12  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      Of course this is not news....by feigning to fight the threat of the talibans, the Pakistani government is holding the US to ransom as it is the latter's fervent idea that the taliban should not be revived and thus financed the fight to pursue it, to the extent that they are pumping tonnes of money into the Pakistani coffers and who does not want money......the US should stop financing the war against these so-called terrorists and see if they can indeed overwhelmed the Pakistani people, for no amount of coercion and monetary incentives can prevent the people to embrace the talibans, if they do not want to be.....
    • HOR  •  Centro, Mexico  •  3 months ago
      those whitefolks dont need money really. all that counts to them are there weapons of mass destructions cause thats all that counts when going to battle of wits or everything else fails. if they have to, if they dont have any money, they will make up any false reasons to get what they are after and by now you should realize they have lots of the weapons to back it up.

    Featured Blog Posts