YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Singapore website apologises to PM's brother

    A Singapore political website late Thursday apologised to the brother of Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong for a comment posted by a reader which it admitted was defamatory.

    Temasek Review Emeritus (TRE) said the comment was left on its website by the reader who was reacting to an article published late last month and that it had no intention to defame company executive Lee Hsien Yang, the premier's younger brother.

    The website had earlier Thursday said it would mount a legal challenge and named human rights lawyer M. Ravi -- known for defending opposition politicians -- as its legal counsel.

    However, the website later announced it had replaced Ravi with a senior counsel and that negotiations were underway for a settlement.

    "We, the editorial team of TR Emeritus, acknowledge and regret that a defamatory comment about Mr Lee Hsien Yang was placed on our website by a netizen," TRE said.

    "We had and have no intention to defame Mr Lee. We have removed the said defamatory comment from our website."

    It was the second time in as many days that the website -- known for its anti-establishment postings -- had to apologise for a comment deemed defamatory.

    On Wednesday the website issued an apology to Prime Minister Lee for a post that alleged nepotism in the appointment of his wife as head of a state investment company.

    TRE had earlier argued that apologising for every defamatory comment from readers would make it difficult to run the website.

    The younger Lee's lawyer, Tan Chuan Thye, expressed satisfaction at the settlement.

    "My client is satisfied his requests have been met, that the false and defamatory postings have been removed and that TRE has acknowledged and expressed regret over this posting," Tan said.

    "The vindication of his name and reputation is important."

    Online political websites like TRE have gained popularity as alternative news and opinion sources in Singapore, where the mainstream media is perceived to be pro-government.

    International human rights groups have regularly criticised Singapore leaders including premier Lee and his father Lee Kuan Yew, the city-state's founding prime minister, for using financially ruinous libel suits to silence critics and political opponents.

    Singapore leaders however have countered that the lawsuits are necessary to protect their reputation.

    How do you feel about this article?

     
    • Allgooner  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      I wonder if there is a channel for the common people to ask for the government's or PAP's apologies when they makes false statements or mistakes?

      I am not anti-government but I want to know what checks and balances system do we have please, even down to managing & regulating public apologies. It seems the only people receiving apologies are either members of the government or PAP (it seems), why?
      • Peter 3 months ago
        You are one of many who don't know what is going on in your country. The parliament is yours to debate the government. What other system do you want to check the government?????
        Vote for PAP and you have only the government to check the govenment.Cock !
      • Allgooner 3 months ago
        You missed my point....dun u think it is just so one-sided when it comes to apologies? Only Gov't or PAP get apologies, what about us or the opposition parties, dun we deserve apologies too?

        I am sure the common pple & oppositions have felt unduly offended, but who listens in paliament - that is greatly dominated by PAP? Who to give pressure and push for an apology? If you answer is "have money/ power then will have apology", then we have failed as a society, and it is unhealthy for Singapore.

        Even if you are a PAP supporter (well, me too), we still need to sit back and observe for flaws in our system. Do you understand?
      • GilbertL 3 months ago
        When I travel to many overseas countries, they repect Singapore Government and system and they want to leran from Singapore. For such a tiny small country with no natural resources and Singaore enjoy world class in many areas/fields, what check and balance you need ? If the Government is not good, The whole country would have been "eaten" by Malaysia or Indonesia long time ago. Go and live/work in oversesa and see how first before you want to "bring down" Singapore !!! Treasure what you have !!!
    • Former employee  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      The PAP only makes things worse. They have not changed after the election despite people still voting for them. Can't blame Singaporeans for siding the Opposition because we have been in the cage for so long. The generation now are not as stupid as the older generation. Harsh truth? The government is using their power on the people but not in the right way. You want people to respect you and see you as a leader, you have to set a good example. Just like an abusive boss will only make his employees quit and turn rebelllious. Can't you see more Singaporeans are getting rebellious? Saying sorry only before an election really makes people think you will not repent because you are a government who only cares about power and money. Isn't that already going towards a corruption? There are certain truths and it is not defamation.
      • Hope 3 months ago
        @Former Employee, The generation now are not as stupid as the older generation, but why The older PAPs can return all their older generation cpf monies when they reach 55yrs old. Hope the new PAPs too can return all the new generation sg cpf monies to all above 55 yrs old too. It is ours hard earn monies, if they are FTs or FWs it their hard earn monies. Hope the govt will return it to their citizens so as to get blessing from them and make our homeland a prosperous place to live. I salute Mr LKY and his team for return all his fellow citizens their cpf monies when they are 55 during that period.
      • Ninjastar Rank 3 months ago
        Hmm.....
      • frank 3 months ago
        this resident idiothas forgotten the other 60% are also people
    • Ah Chew  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      The Apple never falls far from the tree.same old same old.
    • Huat ah!  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      Must get Concise Oxford Dictionary to add in one new word. Leepotism. Because not every case of nepotism is nepotism. Definition of Leepotism is very special and they are mutually exclusive. Note that these 2 words though may mean the same to a certain extent, but the vast difference comes from the fact that one incurs loss of money due to lawsuit, or apology, or both (in most cases).
      • Armorboot 3 months ago
        LOL, too bad I can only put one thumbs up for u, if not, I will put 10 thumbs up XD
      • Ah Chew 3 months ago
        @ Huat Ah!! LOL, a really good one!
      • bris 3 months ago
        @Huat Ah It's all LEEgalised Corruptions.
    • Tan  •  3 months ago
      Just because the old monkey and joker are your family member. lan lan apologise, When old monkey gone and joker out, Every citizen will curse and swear at you. then you lan lan.
      • George 3 months ago
        this day will come very soon
    • Spin Doctor  •  3 months ago
      "Singapore leaders however have countered that the lawsuits are necessary to protect their reputation."

      WHAT reputation??
      Oh ya!! Reputation for being "THE UNTOUCHABLES"
      enuff said
      • Sunny 3 months ago
        Million Dollars Reputations to Protect, Bro
      • A Yahoo! User 3 months ago
        There are lawyers and there are lawyers?
        We want Jury system!!!! wah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
      • Nanyang 3 months ago
        I'm 100% against jury system. The juries are commoners neither trained to detect lies nor in criminal investigations, criminal psychology and e like. Sentiments can get the better of level-headed analysis. NO way! The country will be brought down soon with rampant injustice.
    • Bx  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      So we have no right to say any comments on our views. Like this what freedom of speech we have. Little bit sue already. They can because they have the money, we have what nothing. Well people of Singapore see, hear, listen and observe what is happening.
    • Terry  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      Leaders of other nations can't be bothered to sue for defammation as they know who and what they are as leaders. They are secure and not afraid. Our Sporean leaders seem to be otherwise!!!
    • Jonn  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      Some people just don't have it! They just cannot reinvent themselves. Catherine is ever so Right.
    • Serhwee  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      To all True Singaporeans!! We have to take our country back before we will like HK that maid also can become PR, dun let that day happens, vote wisely in 2016
    • Tan  •  3 months ago
      if netizens stand up and defend their remarks with evidences and rationale, why fear?
    • William  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      Its not about fear, but we are in Singapore and the law is so "fair" that most of the time you will be the loser if your are at the other end.
      法律是公正的,不过不代表是公平的。
    • fcte  •  Lanzhou, China  •  3 months ago
      Lees' legacy has been deteriorating from Singapore's pride to becoming a gang of prosecuters.
    • SING  •  3 months ago
      Even Hong Kong Chief Executive Donald Tsang Yam-kuen got hounded by the media for the controversial property purchase of a HK$50 million three-storey 6500 sq ft penthouse unit at Shenzhen. Where is the transparency in Singapore? What are our journalists doing?
    • PingPong  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      Aiyah! Say "SORRY" only, mah!
      Pm also baey pai sei anyhow say "SORRY" before the GE but never meant it.
      So, just say lor.
    • zorro  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      The risk of being a foreigner in own land

      This is a risk Singapore has to face when we have a sizable population of newly arrived Chinese and Indians. Will we become more Singaporeans or more Chinese? Will we become more Singaporeans or more India?

      This is a question that MOE cannot solve and so we have social integration programs for foreigners, for new citizens. We are spending to include them in our family called Singapore.

      When we are welcoming foreign talents, scholars, and workers, mentally we must also accept their value system and cultural differences. There is no free lunch in this world! We must prepare to pay the price of the consequences – their criticisms, their comments, their behaviors, and their advantage taking of Singapore etc.

      This is why we need to know the investment risk, the trade-off, the acceptable and comfortable level of having foreign talents, scholars and workers in Singapore. Perhaps, the government is already preparing the annual report of profit and loss and balance sheet of there foreigners every year. But as usual it is not prepared to share the annual report with the citizens or may be the report is too frightening to be released.

      .
    • EMERITUS GOAT  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      let get rid of the Lee dynasty
    • adlcia  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      ABIT SUE bit SUE...NO WONDER ALL MEDIACORPS NEWS CASTERS espeacially CHANNEL NEWS ASIA...DARE NOt ask tough questions during interview.melissa hyak will smile and smile ...Sir here ...Sir there till teeth go dry.....panty become loose...knees shiver.LEARN FROM bbc or CNN..that is true journalism...that is real news.....
    • Ms Tan  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      at the end of the day, its still back to square one - the fear factor is very much alive.
    • Phillip  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      LHY... Are U a Saint ???
      Why you resigned from SinTel ??

    Featured Blog Posts