• whenthetimecomes  •  3 months ago
    By withholding our CPF, the budget should have provided those 55 and above free outpatient healthcare, free transport. Good to have more hospitals built for those requiring in-patient, better if they can actually provide $8 charges for heart by-pass surgeries, free pre and post natal healthcare ... basically the budget is not good enough.
    • 3 months ago
      Fully agreed
    • Kum Wei Hanwei 3 months ago
      At least got something but cannot see the money is grow
    • K p 2 months ago
      WAIT LONG LONG.............................................
  • Alfretz  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
    Singaporeans should, if not must, be given the choice of whether to withdraw their CPF savings at 55 or not. This then is fair because many of us were told that we could at the point in time when we first joined the workforce about three decades ago. Choices and flexibility are keys to lesser stress level!
    • Black Knight 3 months ago
      All monies invested via GLC and other Government Investments units, after losses of billions as they announced, balance little with huge debts. If need to settle they have to sell all the GLCs to repay the public monies.
    • neutrino123 3 months ago
      Hard to disagree with giving a choice to those 55 and above.Currently our official government's concern is those who withdrew at 55 might miss manage their funds, go burst and became a burden to tax payers. Make those who chose to withdrew sign a contract: promise to be accountable and responsible for their choice, when they spend every last cent before they die, the government will never have to feed, cloth, or shelter them.

      Next we need political parities to agree they will never lobby to void that contract for people who withdrew at 55, even if these irresponsible are majority of the voter. This is to make staying in CPF a viable choice, else everyone would just cash out at 55, enjoy life, and make tax payers feed them till they are 6ft under.

      3rd we as Singaporean need to agree, for people who collected their CPF at 55 and go bankrupt after, it not government's fault/business, thus we should never point fingers at them, we can donate/setup charities to help the poor but we can't blame the government.

      With all this 3 element, it should grease the process and make it a viable choice for both voters and government. And before vigilantes start attacking, I hope to remind you, you are fighting for the right to spend your money and not for government/tax payers to feed you; Those who wish to withdrew always claim they are responsible, and won't misuse their money, thus with or without that contract won't make a difference. If it make any difference, those clams are lies!
    • Sam Viviki 3 months ago
      bro,u r right,but will PAPAYA,COMMIT to release sporean CPF at 55,if they can,2016 still got chance,if they still buuldoze SOORY THEN....it like a piece of broken cake for ppaya.sporean understan the meaning,not all r burden to tax payer,if only gamen willing to chg CPF withdwrl policy to 55 all ppl r happy...DON'T TELL US CPF getting dry alrdy...aftr all is ppl $$$ NOT GAMEN $$..U GAMEN WANT TO RETAIN FINE,RETAIN UR 2.5% PORTION THE REST return ..can or not.....???
  • Maninblack  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
    They don't care and can't give back our CPF at 55 but they can take time to meticulously work out a plan to give 1.1 BILLION of the budget to a GROSSLY PROFIT MAKING PRIVATISED transportation entity? I have totally lost hope on our ruling party...
    • jubes69 3 months ago
      Off course they will give them the $1.1b, guess who is the major share holder.
    • S.C 3 months ago
      Bull's eyes . A good point, any explaination.
    • Oops.. 3 months ago
      come 2016... bye bye PAP !
  • RG  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
    The bonus of 12K to 20K for the elderly to downgrade their existing flat to a smaller unit is not very justified. HDB under Khaw Boon Wan is now building Studio flats all over the island. The shoe box unit of between 35 to 45 sq mtr. which comes with only a 30 years lease is giving HDB lots of profits. The present selling price of a 45 sq mtr. studio flat in areas like Queenstown is about 150K. The buyers have to pay the full sum upfront. When someone buys a property, most likely the price will appreciate with time but buyers of HDB studio flats gets nothing after the expiry of 30 years lease. The 1st owner of a studio flat in Queenstown pays 150K. After 30 years, the flat belongs to the HDB again and they would sell it to another buyer. By then property could have appreciated by a few folds. HDB would sell the flat to another buyer at probably 400K. Another 30 years later, (60 years ) again the HDB will take back the flat and sell it to a 3rd buyer at probably 600K. So for a total of 90 years, HDB could sell the same property (a small shoebox unit ) to 3 different buyers at a total value of over 1 million. For a small shoebox unit, they could sell over 1 million on a 90 years total lease period is far more costly than buying a private condo a few times bigger with a 99 years lease and some are even freeholds. If any old folks would join this sceme, after selling their existing flat, part of the proceeds would go back to the CPF and would be locked up as retirement sum. Another 150K would go to the paying of a studio flat. So in the end, what balance amount would they have. So is this a fair deal for the senior citizens who have help to build our nation. Think about that.
    • Tony 3 months ago
      C'mon HDB, if really care for the elderly, just help them wholeheartedly on the studio rule,give them a peace of mind when approaching sunset.
    • RG 3 months ago
      If buyers of a studio falt lives beyond 30 years, they would be homeless and would probably have to sleep at void decks.
    • Black Knight 3 months ago
      Nothing left over for their children, PAP's Policy make every one as fool and want Singaporeans be a slave to their party by double standard living, one part of Singaporean and FTs living in Free HOLD, another part of majority Singaporeans (poor and middle level) under various lease basis. The lease base people living and their generation become a slave to those policy makers. But time will over rule, need to wait for the day.
  • Black Knight  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
    Nothing very great and still favouring FTs. 7% GST to abolish for Rich people to invest in Gold, this should have announced in the Budget, but said yesterday in the separate announcement. Why such kind of tricky and physiological approach with our Singaporeans? Every Citizens need to note one thing, ALWAYS WHENEVER OUR MIW VISITING OVERSEAS THEY HAVE ANNOUNCE IMPORTANT NATIONAL ISSUE IN THE PRESS CONFERENCE, THIS IS ALSO A PHYSIOLOGICAL APPROACH. I believe is not work always and now days due to Social communication via modern Technology.
    • Sawadi Thai 3 months ago
      The bigger debtor for this PAP clever/smart people is the citizen of Singapore. They can't pay out, they really got no money, so they keep borrowing from us by delaying the payout. All this because we are stupid. However there 60.1 how are smart and clever.
  • RG  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
    If the govt. and Mr Khaw Boon Wan truly care for the senior citizens who bought studio flats, allow them to sell the flat in the open resale market if they intend to sell the flat. Alternatively, after the 30 years lease expired , let them have part of the profits when the property price appreciated and not just taking back the flat without a single cent given back to them.
  • Auntiefiftyeight  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
    Living in Singapore day by day make us old folks so SICK!!!!!!!!!! I am 58, how to live till 64
    before I can lift my weak hands to touch my CPF. I have 121K in my retirement account and
    26K in medisave but not enough to eat everyday. OH, WHAT IS LIFE TO ME NOW!!!!!!!
  • Suffering Singaporean  •  3 months ago
    nothing spectacular ..... Singaporeans are still at the shortest end of the economic stick and mind you this is a very thin stick for Singaporeans ..... the biggest end of the economic stick goes to the self-serving incumbent party and their elites cahoot and FTs .... after all Singaporeans have to slogged to raised their families both parents have to be working full time while the FTs can survive on Single Income arrangement and live in spanking places

    talk about work life balance and this is only relevant for the self-serving elites incumbent party and FTs while many Singaporeans have to rely on dual income for survival.
  • force to say.....  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
    WTH...till now...die die also hold tie of our CPF $$$ & dun let go at 55..I can't get a job at 46 although I a technical specialist..Ya...I dun mind to downgrade my standard...BUT will you stand it to become a cleaner or a operator ? & even buy a resales flats cost at $650k+COV $40K also cannot get the flat & realised it taken by the China ppls..after the property agent reveal...how our childrens get the flats when they marry..??? Those married couple pls go & check how much is the fees for your future children to study in Uni..Bloody 60% ..hope you are the persons invole in all this issues..
  • 全民最大党  •  3 months ago
    The Minister started off by assuring that the Budget was aimed at creating a “fair system of taxes and benefits”.

    Then he declared: “Investment–grade gold and other precious metals are essentially financial assets that are actively traded and are just like other financial instruments that do not attract GST. I will therefore exempt them from GST.”

    The move, according to the Minister, is to facilitate the development of gold trading in Singapore. This would lure even more asset managers to Singapore in our frenzy to turn this island into a financial centre.

    With wealth disparity getting bigger and bigger, the tax system should be adjusted to become fairer towards the poor. Many countries have removed the GST for basic necessities so that those at the bottom of the economic scale are not unduly burdened.

    Everyone – from billionaires to the homeless – has to eat. A 7 percent tax on food affects someone earning $1,000 a month much more than it does his neighbour earning $10,000.

    But despite evidence that demonstrates that removing the GST for essential items would significantly benefit the working-class and help level up society, the PAP has steadfastly refused to do so.

    Instead, it chooses to abolish the GST for gold and other precious metals which only the rich are able to afford to deal in. Do rich people in Singapore look like they are in need of more help from the Government?

    This is symptomatic of the policy direction of the PAP. It remains callous to needs of the people who most need state support while paying meticulous attention to the wants of those with wealth and power.

    It is a Government that has lost all sense of decency.
  • Kumar  •  3 months ago
    all i can say is this is the budget that will be remembered by voters in the next election.
  • Education Manpower Outsou ...  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
    The annual income shall based on entirely members in the family NOT only on individual pay when given the budget. Let give one example, there may be 1 person working in the entire family and earning $4500 per month and the monthly family income per month is only $4500 whereas there are 4 person in the family with each earning $2500 per month and the month family income per month $10k. Is it fair to those family with one person working only to support total 5 memebers in the family?
    Please think carefully before implement the budget given to the citizen..
  • Alfred  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
    They raise the fare and promised us with better service,they keep the profit ! and now we have to paid for their bus !(1.1BILLION ) why...why..can anyone please explain...WHY ????
  • 全民最大党  •  3 months ago
    Removing the GST for gold and other precious metal will only benefit the wealthy.
    Seriously, I am sitting here in front of my computer, extremely disgusted with these hopeless politicians.
    Still, blame for all these failed policies lies entirely with the daft 60% who keep voting for these useless politicians despite them not wanting to improve the lives of ordinary Singaporeans.
    “How much do you want? Do you want three meals in a hawker centre, food
    court or restaurant?”
  • KM  •  3 months ago
    I wonder is the removal of 7% GST for gold , a subtle way to signal the population that its time to keep Gold rather than hard currency. After all there are many nations who are in debt now. Gold may be the new security. Any way its always better not to keep all your eggs in one basket.
  • 全民最大党  •  3 months ago
    When they are high above the clouds, they can’t see the ground. Who cares if you earn $1000 and you neighbor earns $10000 per month. The message from them is … To pay less gst, to buy less, to eat less, to wear less, to enjoy less and not to compare yourself to your neighbour and them getting 6digit monthly pay.
  • Singapore Handicap Man  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
    No never help all the singaporean only concern about their older families member benefit but sure no concern or relate to all singaporean. CPF what is 2.5%? few dollars then spend more then few hundreds in order to stay alive. shit you pap vampire blood sucker and I sure send god solider to punish you all.
  • KM  •  3 months ago
    Millionaires can now buy gold... No GST anymore..
  • OMG ! ! !  •  2 months ago
    STINKS !
    Should reduce spending on Military.
    Should reduce spending on salaries and the PMO.
    Increase spending on Health, Social and Housing.
    Get rid of ineffective COE and ERP systems,
    Don't hog CPF Monies.
    Reduce CPF Draw-down age.
    Discard FOREIGN TRASH policies. Singaporeans FIRST !
    Bottom line, ruling party STINKS ! ! !
  • Vincent  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
    Hello Mr Finance, stop giving us all this bonus when we have to pay to back with interest is worst than any loan shark.
    Just cut the crab and cut the GST. That's all we ask for and that's what most Singaporean want.