84% oppose bus fare hikes for higher driver wages: Y! Poll

Would you pay more in bus fares so that transport operators can pay their bus drivers higher salaries?

An overwhelming 84 per cent of more than 3,000 Yahoo! Singapore readers who participated in its poll on the topic said they would not, believing that transport companies should absorb the resulting increase in costs.

A significant majority of more than 120 comments posted on Yahoo! Singapore’s Facebook page also clamoured for bus operators SMRT and SBS Transit to restructure their organisations, or cut the pay of their senior executives in order to compensate the increase in their bus drivers’ salaries.

“Cut management bonuses and shareholders’ dividends,” wrote Facebook user Mark Chan. “Why should a small minority benefit at the expense of the public and the hundreds of drivers who perform an essential public service?”

Agreeing with Chan, user Eugene Cheong added, “They should review, remove ‘redundancy’ and restructure internally to achieve savings, rather than conveniently letting the public bear the cost. That is not right.”

Still others pointed out that the provision of public transport should not yield the levels of profit that SBS Transit and SMRT currently enjoy. The former earned a full-year net profit of S$235.6 million last year, while the latter’s was S$119.9 million.

Talk of raising bus fares was triggered close to the end of last week when transport minister Lui Tuck Yew hinted at the possibility in his first comments in the wake of the SMRT bus drivers’ strike that took place at the end of last month.

In the two-day strike, which the government deemed illegal, more than 180 drivers from China refused to work, citing a disparity in salary systems between themselves and other foreign drivers. Five of them were charged for their involvement in the strike, 29 were dismissed and deported, and about 150 drivers were warned by the police.

Affirming the need for bus drivers’ salaries to rise in general, Lui said that there is a “significant mismatch” between fare increments and fuel and wage costs, and that the next public transport fare review will need to factor this in.

Commenting on this on Facebook, user Lucas Loh wrote, “This (the strike) is probably an opportunity they will pounce upon to raise fares. Forever raising regardless of strike or no strike... public transport is the most basic thing for all of us and must be kept affordable for everyone.”

In a recent Yahoo! Singapore poll of more than 3,000 readers, some 84 per cent said firms should absorb the costs …

While just 4 per cent of respondents adopted the opposing stance, saying it would only be fair for fares to rise in order for salaries to do so, 11 per cent of respondents said the salaries of bus drivers did not need to be raised at all, almost three times the number who agreed with a fare increment.

Opposition parties challenge suggestion to raise bus fares

Meanwhile, over the weekend, opposition political parties spoke up against the possibility of raising bus fares to increase drivers’ salaries.

In a statement, the Workers’ Party (WP) said it was premature of Minister Lui to suggest it, saying that such decisions “should be made only after a period of review and adequate debate”, taking public interest and the fact that public transport is an essential public good into consideration.

“The government should not assume nor suggest that this cost increase (of higher salaries) must automatically be borne by commuters,” the party said, noting that despite its $1.1 billion subsidy to the operators earlier this year, coupled with their above-median-level returns on equity for their shareholders, bus fares had still increased eightfold since 12 years ago.

“Commuters should not be expected to pay higher fares... the government and public transport operators must put the public interest before shareholders’ interests,” it added.

The Singapore Democratic Party backed the WP up in its statement on Sunday as well, calling such a move “reprehensible and unacceptable”.

“If public transport is an essential service like the police or firefighters, then it cannot at the same time be a profit-making enterprise. The government cannot have it both ways,” said its secretary-general Chee Soon Juan.

Echoing the views of both parties, Reform Party secretary-general Kenneth Jeyaretnam said in a statement that the current public transport system is negatively impacting commuters.

“Singaporeans seem to be getting the worst of both worlds: a private system with shareholders who benefit from government subsidies and where the operators do not face a sufficient spur from competition to increase efficiency,” he wrote.

The party also issued a further call for more competition to be allowed in the public transport sector, alongside a public inquiry into improving the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of Singapore’s public transport system.

Added Jeyaretnam, “The newfound assertiveness of PRC workers may be an indication that the era of cheap labour outflows from China may be coming to an end as their workforce population is forecast to peak and then start to decline in the next few years.”

Speaking to Yahoo! Singapore, the Singapore People’s Party added its view that the cost of public transport in Singapore is socialised, while the profits from it are privatised.

“The public transport companies in Singapore have tended to rely on public funding whenever they are incapable of getting their act together, yet their profits go only to their shareholders,” it said in a statement on Monday night.

Calling on the government to clarify whether the increase in bus fares is for the sole purpose of increasing bus drivers’ salaries, should it happen, it said that would be “unacceptable given this state of affairs”.

Read some related stories on this:

China bus drivers' pay is fair, SMRT CEO insists
SMRT bus drivers' strike: Were they really treated fairly?
2 China workers protesting on crane arrested

  • Look, don't touch: Flickr photo of the day 1 hour 47 minutes ago
    Look, don't touch: Flickr photo of the day

    If there's one car that's particularly sought-after among today's well-heeled car collectors, a Ferrari 250 would be it. Usually it's the GTO variant, like the 1963 that sold for a record $52 million last year. A 250 of any sorts demands unfathomable cash, however, which is why we can but gawk at this 250 Testa Rossa. It's as close as any mere mortal will ever come to owning one.

  • Peeling out at Octane Academy, the free driving school for Ford ST owners 2 hours 43 minutes ago
    Peeling out at Octane Academy, the free driving school for Ford ST owners

    Buyers of Ferraris or Jaguars are used to perks from manufacturers – including racetrack lessons to help master their exotic machines. But for enthusiasts on a tighter budget, the Ford ST Octane Academy might be the sweetest deal in motoring: Buy a Ford Fiesta ST or Focus ST hatchback, and the reward is a free day of training at one of America’s longest, most-lavish road courses.

  • Why you can't buy America's greenest car 5 hours ago
    Why you can't buy America's greenest car

    Ask me or any auto expert what's the fastest car you can buy for any given amount, and we could easily cough up several options. Same for most luxurious, or off-roadable, or any other measurement. Yet there's one type of question that's far harder to answer: What's the greenest, most environmentally friendly car you can buy today?

  • Pirates kidnap three on Singapore tanker off Malaysia
    Pirates kidnap three on Singapore tanker off Malaysia

    Armed pirates boarded a Singapore-managed oil tanker in the Strait of Malacca, kidnapping three Indonesian crew and stealing some of the vessel's shipment of diesel fuel, the International Maritime Bureau said Wednesday. The attack occurred early Tuesday off Malaysia's west coast, said Noel Choong, head of IMB's Kuala Lumpur-based piracy reporting centre. The diesel oil tanker was believed to be en route to Myanmar. "IMB is aware of the attack on the Singapore-managed ship in the Malacca Straits.

  • McDonald's Hello Kitty sale site temporarily suspended due to fresh wave of Kitty mania
    McDonald's Hello Kitty sale site temporarily suspended due to fresh wave of Kitty mania

    It may not be safe to enter a McDonald’s restaurant in Singapore on Mondays starting 28 April. To celebrate the iconic Japanese character Hello Kitty’s 40th anniversary, the fast food chain announced last Friday that it would be releasing a new collection of Hello Kitty toys in McDonald’s restaurants island wide next Monday.

  • First sign of S.Korea ferry disaster was call from a frightened boy
    First sign of S.Korea ferry disaster was call from a frightened boy

    He called the emergency 119 number which put him through to the fire service, which in turn forwarded him to the coastguard two minutes later. That was followed by about 20 other calls from children on board the ship to the emergency number, a fire service officer told Reuters.