- Oops!Something went wrong.Please try again later.
Canberra is looking “carefully and closely” at US-China trade flows, with the inference that the phase one trade deal is causing “managed trade” that may breach World Trade Organisation protocols and damage Australia’s exports.
Trade Minister Simon Birmingham told the South China Morning Post in a statement on Monday that while “the full nature or implications of this arrangement may not be clear for some time”, Australia is on the lookout for trade diversion that could hit its own exports to China.
“Of course, if we believe the deal enters into some sort of managed trade realm that appears to be in breach of World Trade Organisation [WTO] obligations, we'll certainly look carefully and closely,” Birmingham said, raising a concern that he and other governments have voiced in the past about the controversial trade pact.
Australia’s caution may be made moot by recent events that threaten the US-China phase one trade deal. Chinese government officials have told major state-run agricultural companies to pause purchases of some American farm goods including soybeans and pork as Beijing evaluates the ongoing escalation of tensions with the US over Hong Kong, news agencies reported Monday.
However, Chinese state-owned firms bought at least two more cargoes of US soybeans on Monday despite the reports that they would stop doing so, Reuters and agriculture trade publication AgriCensus reported.
On Friday, US President Donald Trump ordered his administration to begin the process of removing Hong Kong’s current US trade privileges in response to China decision to impose a new national security law on Hong Kong, but stopped short of calling for sanctions that would affect the financial industry or the phase one trade deal.
In recent weeks, Canberra has become embroiled in a trade spat of its own with Beijing, resulting in an 80.5 per cent anti-dumping tariff on Australian barley and the suspension of beef exports from four Australian abattoirs. Meanwhile, China has stepped up purchases of previously banned American beef and barley, as it looks to meet lofty import targets imposed by Trump.
Birmingham voiced confidence that the China-Australia Free Trade Agreement, as well as a different export portfolio to the US might shield Australia from a loss in trade. This is despite the fact that China has opened the door to American barley and beef imports in recent weeks, as it looks to increase its imports of American goods by US$200 billion from 2017’s level over the next two years.
“We expect pork, poultry and soybeans to command much of the commodities that will be exported from the US to China, rather than some of our key exports such as beef and wine where we will continue to maintain tariff differential advantages,” Birmingham said.
“Australia has had a major advantage in the Chinese market for many years given our high-quality free trade agreement. This has meant our goods have landed in China with lower tariffs and have given us a competitive advantage.”
“We were never going to have this advantage forever, but as long as the US-China deal is applied in ways that allow fair competition to flow, we should back the quality of our exporters to compete against any other nation.”
Late last week, Birmingham said Australia had joined other countries in asking for the same reduction in red tape awarded to American firms through the phase one trade deal, signed in January, be “extended to all exporters, including Australian exporters, and not just those from the US”, according to The Guardian.
Trade watchers and international institutions have warned that the phase one deal distorts market conditions. By definition, agreements to purchase set amounts of goods from designated sources are classified as “managed trade” and run counter to WTO principles of competition. Governments around the world voiced concerns through the phase one negotiations and since signing that it would result in trade diversion.
The International Monetary Fund said in a research report that in the absence of a boost in China’s domestic demand, the phase one deal would likely cause “substantial trade diversion effects for other countries”.
China’s moves to slap tariffs on Australian barley and ban beef from certain sources raised concerns that Beijing was using economic coercion to punish Australia for its calling for international inquiry into the origins of the coronavirus pandemic. They also stoked fears that China could start buying American goods instead.
In the US, experts said Washington would likely avoid any public perception that US farmers were benefiting at Australia’s expense, given shared wariness of China’s military, political and human rights policies.
Close ties between Australia and the US at a fraught geopolitical time may also mean that Canberra is unlikely to accuse Washington of “selling out an ally”, at least in public, due to China’s growing purchases of American beef and barley, said Philip Shull, a trade consultant who led the US Department of Agriculture’s Beijing operation under the Obama administration.
“I am not aware that the US ever criticised Australia or Argentina for increasing their sales to China during its long and technically unjustified ban on US beef,” he said. “Our trading partners all understand that China, at some point or other, can be expected to rubbish everyone.”
Looking at the Australia-China spat, Shull said China had a long history of using economic “carrots and sticks” for political purposes. “China’s bark is often worse than its bite. But sometimes the bite comes without a warning,” he said.
Get the China AI Report 2020, brought to you by SCMP Research. Learn about the AI ambitions of Alibaba, Baidu & JD.com through our in-depth case studies, and explore new applications of AI across industries. The report also includes exclusive access to webinars to interact with C-level executives from leading China AI companies (via live Q&A sessions). Find out more.
More from South China Morning Post:
This article Australia ‘carefully and closely’ watching US-China phase one purchases for signs of trade diversion first appeared on South China Morning Post