Look again at babies policy


While the debate rages on over the controversial figure of 6.9 million population by 2030, as laid out by the white paper, the way the government sought to communicate this leaves much to be desired.

The almost instantaneous push-back by the people and the backpedalling by the government show the chasm of trust between the two sides.

Released a day after the Prime Minister admitted that his government was “blind-sided by the outcome of some international events” and that it does not have “20/20 foresight”, the latest population projection is quite ironic and would seem a hard sell, as indeed it is.

To add to the public outrage since the paper’s release, government ministers’ backpedalling on the matter does not inspire confidence on such an important matter of national consequence.

Leaders are now saying and trying desperately to explain that the 6.9 million is just a working parameter, or a “worst-case scenario”, for bureaucratic planning purposes.

Well, it is cutting no ice with the common man and woman who see such terms as nothing more than semantics, and for good reasons too.

For one, the government’s past “planning scenarios” were all realised – and exceeded.

Its 1991 concept plan’s “planning scenario” of a 4 million population to be attained after 2010 was instead reached by 2000. And its 2001 projection of a 5.5 million population for the “long term” was later adjusted to 6.5 million. Singapore’s population reached 5.5 million in 2010.

One therefore wonders how the government can say that our “population grew faster than we expected” and why “our infrastructure didn't keep up” when the concept plans of 1991 and its upgraded one in 2001 had already planned for such population numbers. [See here for Concept Plan 2001.]

So, when the Prime Minister and his ministers try to explain that the figure of 6.9 million is only a “planning scenario”, it is understandable that Singaporeans doubt that it is just so.

Singaporeans are also wary of the potential squeeze and their quality of life if such projections should come to fruition.

Who is to say that we won’t in fact reach and even surpass this figure of 6.9 million by 2030 – or even sooner?

All these – exceeding the “planning scenario” numbers, the apparent failure to implement plans put in place, being “blind-sided” despite projected infrastructural needs already pinpointed years earlier –  have created a palpable and deep sense of unease among the populace since the release of the White Paper.

The level of distrust of the current government has especially been accentuated in recent years by its failures to anticipate and address major problems – such as immigration, public transport, public housing, income gap disparity, depressed wages, social cohesion (especially between the foreigners community and locals), and other social issues.

Yet, criticisms have also been levelled at the white paper itself – the most notable coming from Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy Senior Fellow, Donald Low. He “criticised the lack of scholarship and academic rigour in the white paper”, adding on his Facebook posting: “If this was a term paper, I would have no qualms failing it - whether or not I agree with it.”

Yeoh Lam Keong, adjunct senior research fellow at the Institute of Policy Studies (IPS) and Vice President of the Economic Society of Singapore, was just as harsh in his criticism of the paper:

"The problem I have with the white paper,” he said, “is that the trade-offs considered between good jobs and economic dynamism, and population and workforce growth are overly mechanistic, economically simplistic and astonishingly sociologically and politically naïve.”

Women’s rights group, the Association of Women for Action and Research (AWARE) said it “is concerned that the government has once again focused on economic growth, rather than the well-being of its people, as the main determinant of Singapore’s population size and rate of growth.”

"Despite receiving clear signals that public sentiment on this issue is strong,” it added, “the government is fixated on GDP growth through population expansion. The cost to society can already be seen in the claustrophobia and diminished quality of life that many Singaporeans complain about."

Opposition parties such as the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), the National Solidarity Party (NSP) and the Reform Party (RP) have all expressed their disapproval of the white paper. The Workers’ Party (WP), with its 9 Members of Parliament, is expected to state its position in Parliament during the week-long sitting of House this week.

It would thus seem that the government has more convincing to do, if it wants the people to be on board the same boat as it is. At the moment, though, there is little in the white paper to convince Singaporeans that it is in their interests to support a larger population, made up of an ever-larger contingent of foreigners.

Trust and confidence will not be forthcoming from Singaporeans unless the government can solve existing problems in the next few years. Otherwise, there is a real fear that instead of making Singaporeans’ lives better, the infusion of more people onto this tiny island will instead make things worse.

The main problem the PAP government will face – as it already is facing increasingly – is the erosion of trust and confidence in its ability to carry the country forward, to the benefit of Singaporeans.

The way it has thus far communicated the message of the White Paper shows that the Government has much to do in instilling or inspiring trust and confidence in its people.

To this writer, the question really should not be about how many people from foreign lands we want to welcome to our shores, or even how much economic growth we want (which the white paper seems pre-occupied with). The real question is this: have we done enough to encourage our own people to have children? This is the source or root problem which has led to the introduction of the White Paper.

Perhaps we should look again at whether there is nothing more we can do in this aspect. I believe that we have not done all that we can.

Andrew helms publichouse.sg as Editor-in-Chief. His writings have been reproduced in other publications, including the Australian Housing Journal in 2010. He was nominated by Yahoo! Singapore as one of Singapore's most influential media persons in 2011.

Related Stories:
S’pore population to hit 6 million by 2020: paper
Singapore population half foreigners by 2030: govt
Govt clarifies population projections

  • Dr M wants Najib investigated for lying over 1MDB funds in Singapore bank

    Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad has fired another salvo at embattled Datuk Seri Najib Razak, saying the prime minister had "lied" over the status of 1Malaysia Development Berhad's (1MDB) US$1.103 billion (RM3.6 billion) which was said to have been kept at the BSI Bank in Singapore. In referring to Najib's parliamentary reply on the matter earlier this...

  • Najib to make a three-day visit to Japan

    TOKYO: Japan’s interest to participate in the high speed rail (HSR) project between Kuala Lumpur and Singapore, and the second phase of the Look East Policy is expected to be high on the agenda when Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak begins his three-day official visit to Japan Sunday. Malaysian Ambassador to Japan, Datuk Ahmad Izlan Idris said Najib will gain first hand experience of the Shinkansen high speed train when he takes a 96-minute jouney to Sendai which is located 325km from here on Tuesday. “I think this (Shinkansen) will be brought up by the Japanese Prime Minister during the bilateral talk on Monday. And they have planned a briefing for the Prime Minister as well,” he told Malaysian media covering the visit here today. Prior to embarking on the trip, Najib will be given a briefing by officials of the Japan Railway on Shinkansen and development around Tokyo station, as well a tour of the train cockpit. Early this month, Najib and his Singapore counterpart Lee Hsien Loong reaffirmed that both countries were fully committed to the success of the high speed rail (HSR) project linking the republic and Kuala Lumpur, that is expected to reduce the travel time to just 90 minutes compared to more than three hours by road now. The Shinkansen line spans 2,400 kilometres and runs across Japan. Besides Japan, other countries like China, South Korea, Spain, France and Germany are reportedly keen to participate in the project. Ahmad Izlan said that this would be Najib’s second official visit to the country where he will be accompanied by Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor and a delegation that includes Transport Minister Datuk Seri Liow Tiong Lai and Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department, Datuk Seri Idris Jala. According to him, among the agenda that are top on Malaysia’s side are the second phase of the Look East Policy, as well as looking for potential investment in biotech and green technology. “The second phase of LEP started three years ago and both sides are working on a guideline now. Since its implementation more than 30 years ago, more than 15,000 people have benefited from it and contributed to nation building,” he said. At the moment, there are about 5,500 Malaysians residing in Japan, including 2,250 students. During his visit, Najib, who is expected to arrive at 8am Sunday in Tokyo, would attend a cocktail reception with about 250 Malaysian students and community on Sunday. Ahmad Izlan said the official visit, at the invitation of Abe, was supposed to be held last December but was postponed due to the general election in Japan and the massive flood in Malaysia’s east coast states. During the visit here, Najib will have a tight schedule, with the highlight being an audience with Japan’s Emperor Akihito and Empress Michiko at the Imperial Palace on Monday. In the afternoon, Najib will attend a round table meeting with 34 captains of industries, before holding a bilateral meeting with his counterpart Shinzo Abe. Ahmad Izlan said both leaders are expected to discuss various issues and mutual cooperation to further strengthen bilateral ties between the two countries which established diplomatic ties in 1957. “Besides trade and economy issues, both leaders are expected to touch on the South China Sea, as well as Malaysia’s current chairmanship of ASEAN and how Japan can assist in achieving the Asean Economic Community (AEC). On Tuesday, Najib will deliver a keynote address at the World Islamic Economic Forum (WIEF) Roundtable before departing to Sendai to end his visit with a dialogue session with students at the Tohoku university. During the visit, Rosmah will also have a separate programme where she is expected to visit the Institute for Radiological Sciences in Chiba, and the Hiyoriyama Memorial Monument.– BERNAMA

  • YouTube FanFest SG: Fangirl (And Fanboy) Game Strong
    YouTube FanFest SG: Fangirl (And Fanboy) Game Strong

    This might just be the coolest form of Internet addiction therapy.The inaugural YouTube FanFest is back in their home country Singapore for its third year since 2013, having started in Singapore and since then expanding to Japan, India, Manila, Thailand, Australia and even Canada.Photo: YouTubeThis year’s show features a dynamic mix of over 30 widely popular music, comedy, and fashion content creators — the largest FanFest crew to date.So what is YouTube FanFest all about? Simply put, it’s just an excuse for YouTube stars to meet their fans via an official event. ...