PAP, AIM and the big fat white elephant in the room

PAP still has many questions to answer, says our blogger. (Yahoo! photo)PAP still has many questions to answer, says our blogger. (Yahoo! photo)

COMMENT

Just a day after his party won Aljunied GRC in 2011’s general election, Low Thia Khiang said he hoped “he will get the People's Action Party's (PAP) cooperation” in taking over the town council in the constituency.

“Mr Low also hopes that there won't be 'any sabotage' like what he encountered in 1991 when he was first elected in the Hougang single-seat ward,” the Straits Times reported.

Low, who is the Workers’ Party’s secretary general, had had to vacate the Hougang Town Council in Hougang Central and had to turn to his own business contacts to build a new town council at Block 701, Hougang Avenue 2, within 45 days.

Four days after losing Aljunied GRC, one of the PAP’s losing MPs there, Cynthia Phua, gave assurance that there will be a smooth transition of the town council. “We will do a proper handover,” she said. “We will ensure that all the existing contracts that we have are handed over to the new management properly.”

Dismissing concerns that the PAP may sabotage the incoming WP team, Ms Phua said: “The PAP is not that way. It has always been a fair and responsible party. We are direct and transparent in our actions.”

In politics, as they say, sometimes things aren’t what they seem.

The ongoing saga involving the PAP-owned company, Action Information Management Pte Ltd (AIM), and its dealings with the WP’s Aljunied Hougang Town Council, has raised numerous questions of propriety, transparency and accountability. Several writers have written about and raised very pertinent questions about the matter. [Read them here and here.]

In a nutshell, the PAP’s decision to sell the computer system developed by the 14 town councils under its wings to a PAP-owned company is seen as a deliberate attempt to scuttle the efforts of the WP in taking over the running of the town council.

Explanations fall short

The coordinating chairman of the 14 PAP town councils, Teo Ho Pin, has been trying to explain the decision to sell the system to the PAP-owned AIM. His latest 26-paragraph statement, however, obfuscates more than it enlightens, and more questions are raised as Teo seems to have avoided addressing some of the main questions which members of the public have been asking.

Questions such as:

1.    Why leave residents at the mercy of a private entity?
2.    How much was spent to develop the software?
3.    What were, specifically, the tender conditions or requirements laid out in the original tender advertisement?
4.    How much, exactly, did AIM pay to purchase the software? There has been no unequivocal statement on how much AIM paid. News reports and Teo’s statement are vague, saying only that AIM “offered to purchase the software for $140,000”.

An offer to purchase is not the same as the actual amount paid for the purchase.
While all these questions are important and Teo and the PAP should address them immediately, they are not what perhaps are what the most important issues here.

The big fat white elephant in the room – which the PAP and Teo seem to have missed – is the issue of a conflict of interest in selling the intellectual property (IP) of software developed by the 14 PAP town councils and paid for, presumably, by residents or taxpayers, to a PAP-owned company run by three former PAP MPs.

As Alex Au wrote in his blog article: “The most troubling thing is that Teo sees no conflict of interest when putting state assets into partisan hands. It does not matter how it is done, whether through a tender or negotiated sale. The result is plain unacceptable.”

In the process, the PAP town councils have given what is a private entity – and owned by the PAP, no less – much power over the running by elected MPs of town councils through a termination clause in the contract. This was exactly what happened to the WP town council in Aljunied, in fact, after it took over the town council there.

The PAP town councils should not even have considered AIM’s bid, given the obvious conflict of interests here.

Track record

Some have suggested, and not without some reasonableness, that the decision to even put the system – one which Teo himself says was of depreciating value – up for sale is a political one. Given the experiences of opposition MPs in the past, it is not unreasonable to entertain such a possibility.

Low’s experience with the Hougang town council in 1991 is one example. The threat by the PAP to pull out its kindergartens in opposition wards is another. The discrimination of opposition wards in the HDB upgrading programme is yet another example.

Then there is, after the 2011 elections, the transference, by the HDB, of 6 plots of land in Hougang and 26 sites in Aljunied GRC from the purview of the town councils – which had fallen into WP’s hands – to the People’s Association which is the umbrella organisation for all the grassroots organisations (GROs) where PAP MPs or losing PAP candidates are the “advisers”, and they invariably make use of these public spaces and sites for their community activities.

In short, opposition MPs no longer can use these sites, unless they have the permission of the PA or the “grassroots advisers”. This is, in effect, transferring the authority and power from MPs to “grassroots advisers”.

There have also been other instances of such unfair practices by the PAP and its affiliated organisations.

This latest episode with AIM is seen by many as another of these unfair or less than gentlemanly practices, even as PAP MPs promised civility. It is made even worse because it goes beyond the pale of what is ethical. To be sure, no one is expecting political parties or politicians to be angels. In this instance, however, it is the use of taxpayers’ funds for the seemingly political self-interests of the PAP which is grating.

More expected

However Teo or the PAP try to explain away the entire episode, or justify what they have done, they would have missed the real reason for the public’s unhappiness if they do not also understand that Singaporeans expect more from their leaders.

What the public wants and deserves are politicians who have the ability to recognize that while some things may technically be legal, at times it is the better and the more ethical thing to do to not participate in such endeavours at all. In short, leaders must have the gumption to rise above the pettiness of partisan politics and not ingratiate themselves with dubious undertakings for selfish interests.

In this instance, what is disconcerting is that the PAP may have been aware of this conflict of interest (as indeed it must have) but decided to go ahead with the deal anyway. Why it did so would be anyone’s guess.

But to give it the benefit of the doubt, and as AIM is a “fully owned” entity of the PAP, the PAP can address the fundamental issue of how its actions have left residents at the mercy of this private entity and take the necessary steps to address this.

After all, isn’t the interest of the residents one which Teo is concerned about? Or is he more bent on insulting them through explanations and statements which are utterly unconvincing and which raise even more doubts?

“I believe that 20 years on, Singapore has become a more civilised country,” Low said on 8 May after winning Aljunied GRC, expressing his hope that the PAP will not sabotage the handing over of the town council in the ward.

The PAP’s behavior, unfortunately, tells a different tale.

Andrew helms publichouse.sg as Editor-in-Chief. His writings have been reproduced in other publications, including the Australian Housing Journal in 2010. He was nominated by Yahoo! Singapore as one of Singapore's most influential media persons in 2011.


Related stories:

PAP reform: A checklist for change (Part 1)
PAP reform: A checklist for change (Part 2)
Council spat puts PAP in the spotlight

  • Dr M wants Najib investigated for lying over 1MDB funds in Singapore bank

    Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad has fired another salvo at embattled Datuk Seri Najib Razak, saying the prime minister had "lied" over the status of 1Malaysia Development Berhad's (1MDB) US$1.103 billion (RM3.6 billion) which was said to have been kept at the BSI Bank in Singapore. In referring to Najib's parliamentary reply on the matter earlier this...

  • Najib arrives in Japan for 3-day visit

    TOKYO: Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak has arrived here for a three-day visit. Najib, who is accompanied by wife Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor, Transport Minister Datuk Seri Liow Tiong Lai, Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Datuk Seri Idris Jala and Chief Secretary to the Government Tan Sri Ali Hamsa, landed at the Tokyo International (Haneda) Airport at 7.35am (Malaysian time). He will host dinner with Malaysian students and community tonight before embarking on a tight schedule tomorrow. Among the slew of activities tomorrow are an audience with the Japanese emperor and empress, courtesy calls by various Japanese corporate bigwigs, roundtable meeting to discuss Malaysia-Japan economic relations with 31 giant corporation leaders in Japan and bilateral talks with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe. Other than regional and international issues, Abe is expected to reaffirm Japan's keen interest in the Malaysia-Singapore high speed rail project. They are also expected to touch on key issues related to ASEAN, Asean Economic Community, Malaysia's role in the United Nations Security Council and the second phase of the Look East Policy. On Tuesday, Najib will deliver a keynote address at the World Islamic Economic Forum before taking a high speed train to Sendai. He will be given a briefing by the Japan Railway top management on the Shinkanzen network of high speed rail in Japan. In Sendai, Najib will meet Malaysian students at the Tohoku University before departing for Kuala Lumpur.

  • Najib to make a three-day visit to Japan

    TOKYO: Japan’s interest to participate in the high speed rail (HSR) project between Kuala Lumpur and Singapore, and the second phase of the Look East Policy is expected to be high on the agenda when Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak begins his three-day official visit to Japan Sunday. Malaysian Ambassador to Japan, Datuk Ahmad Izlan Idris said Najib will gain first hand experience of the Shinkansen high speed train when he takes a 96-minute jouney to Sendai which is located 325km from here on Tuesday. “I think this (Shinkansen) will be brought up by the Japanese Prime Minister during the bilateral talk on Monday. And they have planned a briefing for the Prime Minister as well,” he told Malaysian media covering the visit here today. Prior to embarking on the trip, Najib will be given a briefing by officials of the Japan Railway on Shinkansen and development around Tokyo station, as well a tour of the train cockpit. Early this month, Najib and his Singapore counterpart Lee Hsien Loong reaffirmed that both countries were fully committed to the success of the high speed rail (HSR) project linking the republic and Kuala Lumpur, that is expected to reduce the travel time to just 90 minutes compared to more than three hours by road now. The Shinkansen line spans 2,400 kilometres and runs across Japan. Besides Japan, other countries like China, South Korea, Spain, France and Germany are reportedly keen to participate in the project. Ahmad Izlan said that this would be Najib’s second official visit to the country where he will be accompanied by Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor and a delegation that includes Transport Minister Datuk Seri Liow Tiong Lai and Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department, Datuk Seri Idris Jala. According to him, among the agenda that are top on Malaysia’s side are the second phase of the Look East Policy, as well as looking for potential investment in biotech and green technology. “The second phase of LEP started three years ago and both sides are working on a guideline now. Since its implementation more than 30 years ago, more than 15,000 people have benefited from it and contributed to nation building,” he said. At the moment, there are about 5,500 Malaysians residing in Japan, including 2,250 students. During his visit, Najib, who is expected to arrive at 8am Sunday in Tokyo, would attend a cocktail reception with about 250 Malaysian students and community on Sunday. Ahmad Izlan said the official visit, at the invitation of Abe, was supposed to be held last December but was postponed due to the general election in Japan and the massive flood in Malaysia’s east coast states. During the visit here, Najib will have a tight schedule, with the highlight being an audience with Japan’s Emperor Akihito and Empress Michiko at the Imperial Palace on Monday. In the afternoon, Najib will attend a round table meeting with 34 captains of industries, before holding a bilateral meeting with his counterpart Shinzo Abe. Ahmad Izlan said both leaders are expected to discuss various issues and mutual cooperation to further strengthen bilateral ties between the two countries which established diplomatic ties in 1957. “Besides trade and economy issues, both leaders are expected to touch on the South China Sea, as well as Malaysia’s current chairmanship of ASEAN and how Japan can assist in achieving the Asean Economic Community (AEC). On Tuesday, Najib will deliver a keynote address at the World Islamic Economic Forum (WIEF) Roundtable before departing to Sendai to end his visit with a dialogue session with students at the Tohoku university. During the visit, Rosmah will also have a separate programme where she is expected to visit the Institute for Radiological Sciences in Chiba, and the Hiyoriyama Memorial Monument.– BERNAMA