Country singer Dierks Bentley loves ‘90s-era country music so much, he’s even got his own tribute band, the Hot Country Knights. Bentley’s tribute band will be playing at the Seven Peaks Music Festival in Colorado. (March 11)
Country singer Dierks Bentley loves ‘90s-era country music so much, he’s even got his own tribute band, the Hot Country Knights. Bentley’s tribute band will be playing at the Seven Peaks Music Festival in Colorado. (March 11)
US President Joe Biden’s nominee to head the country’s Commerce Department told senators on Tuesday that she would use punitive tariffs and export restrictions against China, but stopped short of a specific commitment to keep existing sanctions against Huawei Technologies in place. “China‘s actions have been anticompetitive, hurtful to American workers and businesses, coercive and … culpable for atrocious human rights abuses, so whether it‘s the ‘entity list’ or tariffs or countervailing duties, I intend to use all those tools to the fullest extent possible,” Gina Raimondo, currently the governor of Rhode Island, testified remotely during her confirmation hearing in the Senate. Wilbur Ross, the commerce secretary during the Trump administration, put Huawei on an “entity list” in May 2019, citing national security concerns, a move that prevented US suppliers from selling goods and technology to the company without a special licence.Get the latest insights and analysis from our Global Impact newsletter on the big stories originating in China. Other Chinese companies on the list include Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (SMIC) and the drone maker DJI Technology. When Senator Ted Cruz, a Texas Republican known for his strident anti-China stance, pressed Raimondo for assurances she would not remove Huawei from the list, the nominee committed only to “review the policy, consult with you, consult with industry, consult with our allies and make an assessment as to what‘s best for American national and economic security”. The response prompted an outcry from Senator Ben Sasse, Republican of Nebraska, who issued a statement questioning Raimondo’s stance. “This is ridiculous,” Sasse said. “Huawei didn’t change because America has a new president. Huawei is still the Chinese Communist Party’s tech puppet and a serious threat to national security. “Tough talk on China is empty if you let Huawei out of the box,” he added. However, Raimondo repeatedly emphasised to Cruz and other senators questioning her a commitment to safeguarding against possible national security threats posed by the use of Chinese telecommunications equipment. Sanctions on China likely to remain: Hong Kong’s American Chamber of Commerce “There‘s an opportunity to move forward in 5G and create great innovation and jobs, but we can’t have the Chinese or really anyone having a back door into our network and compromising in any way our national or economic security,” she said. “I will use the full toolkit at my disposal to the fullest extent possible to protect Americans and our network from Chinese interference or any kind of back door influence into our network, and that’s Huawei, ZTE, or any other company.” Comments by numerous Biden administration officials less than a week into his tenure have suggested that the new president will not diverge substantially from the view that Beijing presents a threat to US national security requiring more vigilance than when Biden was vice-president during the administration of Barack Obama from 2009 to 2017. Antony Blinken, who was confirmed by the Senate as the new US Secretary of State on Tuesday shortly after Raimondo’s hearing, suggested during his testimony last week that he agreed with former president Donald Trump’s “tougher approach to China”. “I disagree very much with the way that he went about it in a number of areas, but the basic principle was the right one, and I think that’s actually helpful to our foreign policy,” he said. Jen Psaki, the White House press secretary, said on Monday that Biden “will take a multilateral approach to engaging with China, and that includes evaluating the tariffs currently in place, and he wants to ensure that we take any steps in coordination with our allies and partners, and with Democrats and Republicans in Congress”. Raimondo’s position at Tuesday’s hearing is not necessarily indicative of how she will proceed towards Huawei or China generally, said Anthony Kim, research manager at the Heritage Foundation, a Washington think tank. Raimondo, he noted, is a relative newcomer in terms of foreign policy and will need to defer to Blinken and others in the Biden administration. “We should view today’s comment as her own, before the whole entire government agency coordination,” Kim said. “This is not a position of the Biden administration at this point, so I think we’ll have to wait and see. “The Commerce Department cannot and will not alone decide what the new, official policy towards China is; that will be closely coordinated with the State Department” as well as the National Security Council (NSC), he noted. Blinken — who during the Obama administration first served as Vice-President Biden’s national security adviser and then as as deputy secretary of state — and Jake Sullivan, who Biden appointed to lead the NSC, hold similar views about China. Sullivan said in a CNN interview earlier this month that the Biden administration would recognise China as a serious strategic competitor to the US. He also said Biden would work out the economic differences between the US and its European allies to improve their relations and jointly counter China on multiple fronts, from trade and technology, to the military and human rights.More from South China Morning Post:Joe Biden’s China policy should keep trade and national security apart to avoid cold war: ex-US commerce chiefChip industry group urges Biden admin to review export controls on China to create ‘level playing field’This article Joe Biden’s commerce secretary pick backs tariffs and export limits against Chinese firms first appeared on South China Morning PostFor the latest news from the South China Morning Post download our mobile app. Copyright 2021.
The Ministry of Health (MOH) confirmed 25 new COVID-19 cases in Singapore as of Wednesday (27 January), taking the country’s total case count to 59,391.
A man sodomised his underaged brother-in-law for over four years, starting from before he married the victim’s sister.
EVOLVE Fight Team members Amir Khan and Kim Kyu Sung analyse Dustin Poirier's shock UFC 257 victory over Conor McGregor.
A Chinese corruption charge that the mother of Canadian music star Wanting Qu embezzled more than 350 million yuan (US$54 million) in her position as a Harbin housing official has been withdrawn, according to a social media post shared by Qu about the long-running case. But Zhang Mingjie, 65, remains in detention with her fate unclear more than six years after the accusations emerged. Prosecutors had sought the death penalty at Zhang’s original 2016 trial, but she has not been convicted. Qu, 36, who first found fame as a pop singer, then as the de facto first lady of Vancouver when she was the girlfriend of then-mayor Gregor Robertson, expressed confidence in the handling of the case by the “perfect and righteous” Chinese justice system in 2018.Get the latest insights and analysis from our Global Impact newsletter on the big stories originating in China. But last September, she decried on Weibo that there was “still no result” on the anniversary of her mother’s arrest, and she was “trying to keep faith in justice”. That prompted a fierce backlash on Chinese social media, and a rebuke for Qu in a commentary by China’s anti-corruption body, the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection. Last Wednesday, Qu shared a Weibo post written in the name of her 78-year-old aunt, Zhang Mingkun, that claimed her sister’s embezzlement charge had been withdrawn at a second hearing on March 12, 2019. It demanded that “justice be served” and questioned whether there was “something fishy going on”. “This fact alone is sufficient to prove that this particular indictment initiated by Harbin Procuratorate was wrong! So please do not mention this 350 million matter! This indictment does not exist any more!” said the post, originally written on January 14. It continued: “Zhang Mingjie was served with a Notice of Termination of Trial, but she is not allowed bail. Don’t you think something is wrong?” Wanting Qu issues update on mother’s death-penalty case A post by the same account on January 17 said interrogators had made Zhang Mingjie confess by threatening Qu. “[Investigators] said during the interrogations that Zhang Mingjie would definitely get the death sentence, and if she did not disclose everything honestly, they would arrest [her] relatives. They also forced Zhang Mingjie to admit her guilt by threatening the reputation of Wanting Qu,” it said. It also claimed that Zhang Mingjie was “tortured emotionally … humiliated, cursed and belittled” during a prolonged interrogation under spotlights. The Harbin Intermediate People’s Court did not respond to a request for information about Zhang’s case. Qu did not respond to a request for an interview that was emailed to her management. Zhang’s original trial in July 2016 was widely reported by Chinese state media, but the court has not publicly updated her status since then. China’s courts have a 99.9 per cent conviction rate, according to the China Law Yearbook. The official Xinhua news agency reported that Zhang, as deputy director of Harbin’s development and reform commission, was accused of selling state-owned farmland to a developer for far below its market value, in exchange for hundreds of millions of yuan in kickbacks. Vancouver’s mayor breaks up with pop star Wanting Qu She also allegedly failed to enforce the payment of tens of millions of yuan in compensation to displaced farmworkers who had lived in dorms on the land, the agency reported. “The court was told that Zhang had not only breached her duty as a civil servant, but also committed the crimes of embezzling public properties worth an enormous amount of money,” Xinhua reported. “Zhang was also said to have committed the crimes of bribe-taking and abusing authority, leading to a severe loss of public assets.” The Weibo account in the name of Zhang Mingkun was set up on January 10. It has since posted 14 times about Zhang Mingjie’s case. “I’ve tried to contact the chief justice, but he says ‘it’s useless to contact me’, he refused to see me in person. With no way out of this, I then had to make my voice heard on Weibo!” a post on the account said on January 21, responding to a question about why the family, including Qu, had taken so long to discuss the case. In the January 14 post, it said: “Even though I felt something was wrong a long time ago, I trusted that justice would be served. I patiently and painstakingly waited for almost seven years, but I discovered that the law enforcement people are not so just. That’s why I had to make myself heard here disclosing the truth to the public.” Chinese corruption prosecutors seek death penalty for mother of Wanting Qu Qu has never given an interview about the case, but has paid tribute to her mother in a handful of social media posts, and by releasing a single about their relationship, titled Your Girl. In March 2018, Qu said on Weibo: “It has been 3 years and 6 months since my mom was taken away on September 22, 2014. There is no point I wouldn’t feel pain, having seen the loss of my mother this way. However, each country has its own law. I believe that the court would hand down a ruling according to law.” When she posted about her mother again in January 2019, saying her “heart aches” for her, the remarks went viral; Weibo posts carrying a hashtag referring to her comments were viewed hundreds of millions of times, although the responses were overwhelmingly negative. Qu moved to Canada as a teenager. Her first album, “Everything in the World”, went platinum in China in 2012, and she sang on CCTV’s 2013 New Year’s telecast. But she is best known in Vancouver as the former partner of Robertson, now 56, who served as mayor from 2008 to 2018. They got to know each other after Qu was appointed Vancouver’s tourism ambassador to China in 2013, and went public with their relationship in early 2015. Robertson subsequently divorced his wife of more than 25 years, Amy Robertson, although a spokesman said no third party was involved in the split and the Robertsons had been separated since mid-2014. Qu and Robertson broke up in 2017.More from South China Morning Post:Pop star Wanting Qu issues update on mother’s death-penalty case, declaring Chinese law ‘perfect and righteous’Vancouver’s Mayor Gregor Robertson splits with pop star Wanting Qu, whose mother faces possible death penalty in ChinaChinese corruption prosecutors seek death penalty for mother of Wanting Qu, pop star girlfriend of Vancouver’s mayorThis article Canadian singer Wanting Qu shares claim that US$54 million Chinese corruption charge against mother is withdrawn first appeared on South China Morning PostFor the latest news from the South China Morning Post download our mobile app. Copyright 2021.
One week into the job, US President Joe Biden has sent a clear warning to Beijing against any expansionist intentions in East and Southeast Asia.
The National Council of Churches Singapore said it was alarmed by news of a youth who attended church and was planning to attack two mosques in Singapore.
Relatives of Wuhan's coronavirus dead on Wednesday said Chinese authorities have deleted their social media group and are pressuring them to keep quiet while a World Health Organization team is in the city to investigate the pandemic's origins.
From this weekend, Britain will start accepting applications from people with British National (Overseas) status for a new visa that would earn them a pathway to citizenship. In the second of a three-part series on the BN(O) visa, we meet families struggling to make the decision to stay or to leave. You can read part one here. Ivy Cheung recalls the day she told her 71-year-old mother she was making arrangements to leave Hong Kong for Britain with her husband and two sons. “She was so angry and shouted at me. I really did not expect it,” said Cheung, 52, who arrived in Hong Kong as a three-year-old from mainland China.Get the latest insights and analysis from our Global Impact newsletter on the big stories originating in China. She tried explaining that the family was leaving for the sake of her sons, not because of politics, but her mother was having none of it. “She disagreed, and made some hurtful comments,” said Cheung, who works in customer service. Her mother distrusts London’s offer of a special visa for Hongkongers with British National (Overseas) status, believing it a ploy to siphon away money from Hong Kong. The heated exchange with her mother left her heartbroken, and things are not yet resolved between them. Her Hong Kong-born husband Johnny Cheung, 56, who works in logistics, would have preferred to stay, but as the only one in the family with BN(O) status, he decided to go for the sake of their sons, aged 17 and 21. “I want my sons to live in a place where there is a higher degree of freedom,” he said. The family hopes to be in Britain by the summer, in time for the younger son to start university. The older son has graduated from the University of Lancaster and plans to enrol in a master’s degree programme. “At my age, it is a big change to adapt to a new life, a totally different lifestyle and culture,” Johnny Cheung said. His parents support his decision and he has four siblings to help care for them, but it will be hard to leave them behind. “For our generation it is tough. We need to look after our parents and also take care of the young generation … but ultimately we need to decide what is best for the family as a whole,” he said. The Cheungs’ emotional struggle came after the British government offered Hong Kong residents with BN(O) status and their dependents a path to citizenship. The move followed Beijing’s imposition of a national security law on Hong Kong last June. Pro-establishment figure calls for curbs on dual citizenship in Hong Kong From January 31, Hongkongers can apply for BN(O) visas that will allow them to live and work in Britain and, after six years, register for citizenship. As many as 5.4 million of the city’s 7.5 million population are said to be eligible, although far fewer are likely to go. Those choosing to leave include single adults and families with young children, as well as older people moving the whole family. At least five families told the Post they were considering settling in Manchester and Birmingham as it would cost less than being in London. Most of the dozen people who spoke to the Post said they wanted out because they no longer trusted the Hong Kong government. But making the difficult decision to leave has resulted in arguments and heartache in some families. Some said that in the end, they chose to stay because they could not bear to leave their elderly parents behind, or realised they could not afford to move. Easy for some, a struggle for others The Fong family will take up the British offer even though it means splitting up. Mother and father, both 55, will join their 20-year-old son in Britain where he is in university, but their 23-year-old daughter will remain in Hong Kong where she has just started as a trainee lawyer. Their son does not have BN(O) status, but their daughter does. Fong, a retired banker who declined to be identified fully, said it was a difficult decision and he would have preferred if the whole family could move. He hopes his daughter will join the rest of them in Britain eventually. Pessimistic about Hong Kong’s future with the arrival of the national security law, he said: “I do not see an imminent danger for ordinary citizens like us, unless you are heavily involved in activities which the government doesn’t welcome ... But in the medium to long term, I can only see things deteriorating.” He admitted his family was among the more fortunate who could leave without much hardship, as both he and his wife were retired and did not need to look for work in Britain. Betty Liu*, 20, wanted her parents to take up the BN(O) offer so she could move to Britain, but they refused outright. “My options are limited because I am not born into a rich family,” said the Baptist University student. She decided she would remain in Hong Kong and save up enough to leave in 10 years. She shared her plan with her parents, saying Hong Kong had changed a lot since the 2019 anti-government protests and Beijing’s imposition of the national security law. Her parents were unhappy. They told her she was being disrespectful to her country and her reasons for wanting to leave were “ridiculous”. “It started as a discussion but turned into an argument. I know they are pro-China and believe China treats Hong Kong very well,” she said. Investment banker Sam Lau*, 26, was hurt when his uncle told him he was “betraying his home” by wanting to leave Hong Kong. “He said I didn’t see myself as Chinese,” he recalled. ‘Living in Hong Kong is suffocating’: early birds who fled to Britain have no regrets To dissuade him, his uncle said Hongkongers were suppressed by the British during colonial rule and the Chinese were abused by the British in the past. However, Lau is determined to move to London in March, despite his parents asking him to wait until the Covid-19 situation improved. He hopes to continue working remotely for the same employer, but will look for a new job if his bosses say no. He plans to take around HK$100,000 with him, and will consider moving to a smaller city to reduce living costs if he cannot find work. “I’m mentally prepared to face the pandemic or discrimination against Chinese people,” he said. Equally determined to leave, despite not having a job or accommodation in Britain, is 30-year-old clinic receptionist Chan. She is making plans to move to Birmingham with her husband and three children aged between one and six. They plan to take about HK$400,000 with them to get settled after arriving there, but she is not worried. “I don’t think it will be hard to find a job,” she said, adding that she had relatives in Birmingham and could count on them for support. Chan’s main motivation for leaving is to ensure a better future for her children, including political freedom and education opportunities. By leaving early, she hopes to get her children enrolled in “better schools” and avoid competing with other Hong Kong families also heading there. “The UK seems less stressful for work and school,” said Chan, who has never visited Britain. “My kids have studied in Hong Kong schools and there’s a lot of homework.” Choosing to stay As soon as Britain announced its BN(O) visa offer, Peter Lo* joined numerous social media groups to get information and insight from others considering leaving, as well as those who had gone to Britain over the past year. The 40-year-old, who works in public relations and is married with a four-year-old daughter, said he was not political and did not take part in the 2019 protests, but was concerned for Hong Kong’s future. He mulled over moving to Britain for months before he was hit by the reality of relocating to a place he had never visited and where he knew no one. The sums did not add up either. His wife would have to stop working as an administrator and become a stay-at-home mum, and they would not be able to afford a domestic helper. Lo and his wife put aside the idea of leaving. “People who bought property in the past 10 years will have made a huge profit and will have HK$5 million or HK$10 million to take with them. That is not me,” said Lo, adding he did not have a lot of savings either. Beijing threatens to stop recognising Hong Kong BN(O) passports Money was not an issue for mother-of-two Wong, 38, whose husband runs his own construction business, but the couple have decided to stay and take care of their parents. The drama teacher, who has BN(O) status, said she spent many sleepless nights agonising over whether to take up the British government’s offer. Her parents and in-laws, all in their 70s, were adamant from the start that they would not leave Hong Kong. Wong realised that even if she could persuade them, moving to Britain would be hard for them as they did not speak English well. “If we moved, they would be alone in Hong Kong. Our kids are important to us, but we are important to our parents too,” she said. “If they get sick, who will look after them? We also need to set a good example to our kids in showing how we deal with our parents.” ‘In their hearts, they want us to stay’ Michael Li* sold his two-bedroom flat in Tseung Kwan O last October for HK$6 million, and plans to move with his wife and year-old son to Britain. He pointed to Hong Kong’s changing education system, rather than the national security law, as his main reason for going to a country he has never visited. “The way China wants children to learn is different from the way we learned in school many years ago,” the 33-year-old IT worker said. The family will leave only after he has secured a job because he wants to use his money to buy property in Britain. Li said his parents understood his reasons for leaving, but “in their hearts, they want us to stay.” He will be leaving behind his sister, uncles and aunts. For Ivy Cheung, quarrelling with her mother over her decision to leave remains painful, but she hopes her mother will eventually come round, and visit the family in Britain. “Even though we are moving, our relationship will not change. She is my mum and I am her daughter, this is forever,” she said. Other changes lie ahead. Cheung said she is prepared to work as a barista in a cafe or even as a supermarket cashier. Her husband, Johnny, is considering going back to being a student. “In Cantonese we say ‘Ngai Gei’,” he said. “It means risk and opportunity. If you look at it one way, taking a risk is also an opportunity. The other way it means an opportunity is also a risk. That is Chinese wisdom.” *Name changed at the interviewee’s request. Read part one of the series, in which we look at how some early bird Hongkongers have already left for Britain.More from South China Morning Post:National security law: tears, fears, but a new life? Hong Kong early birds who have taken BN(O) path to BritainBeijing should ask itself why BN(O) passport holders want to leave Hong Kong, rather than issuing threatsBritain announces new class of visa for Hong Kong BN(O) passport holders as first step in new track to earning citizenshipRetaliation for British BN(O) visa scheme, Hong Kong election overhaul discussed on sidelines of meeting of top legislative body: sourceWhat does Beijing’s current silence over Britain’s citizenship offer to Hongkongers mean for the fate of BN(O)?This article National security law: stay or leave? Quarrels, heartache as Hong Kong families torn over taking up London’s BN(O) ticket first appeared on South China Morning PostFor the latest news from the South China Morning Post download our mobile app. Copyright 2021.
In an unusual and potentially groundbreaking decision, French drugmaker Sanofi said Wednesday it will help bottle and package 125 million doses of the coronavirus vaccine developed by its rivals Pfizer and BioNTech, while its own vaccine candidate faces delays. The announcement came as delays or production problems for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine and a vaccine from Britain's AstraZeneca have caused political uproar across the European Union. Sanofi's Frankfurt facilities will help with late-stage production of vaccines prepared by Germany-based BioNTech, including bottling and packaging, starting in the summer, according to a Sanofi official.
Japan is expected to play a prominent role in the new US administration’s efforts to rally its allies in the Indo-Pacific region – including the South China Sea – in an attempt to counter China’s rise, according to observers. In a move that will deepen unease among Beijing policymakers, US Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin used his first conversation with his Japanese counterpart Nobuo Kishi to reaffirm Washington’s commitment to its partnership with Tokyo. He also urged him to “strengthen Japan’s contribution to the role the alliance continues to play in providing security in the Indo-Pacific region”. Japan could be stabilising influence in US-China relations, says ambassador President Joe Biden’s administration is seeking to rebuild US alliances which were sorely tested by his predecessor’s America First policies.Get the latest insights and analysis from our Global Impact newsletter on the big stories originating in China. Benoit Hardy-Chartrand, an East Asia affairs expert at Temple University in Tokyo, said Japan – which hosts the largest number of US troops in the region, as well as providing a base for the US Navy’s Seventh Fleet – had a “prominent role” to play, even though the contours of Biden’s Indo-Pacific strategy had yet to be determined. “President Biden himself, as well as his nominee for Secretary of State, Anthony Blinken, have made it clear that the reinforcement of Washington’s alliances in the region will be a top priority for the US,” he said. “Japanese Prime Minister [Yoshihide] Suga will be happy to reciprocate, as he has vowed to maintain the foreign policy orientations of his predecessor Shinzo Abe, under whose leadership Japan has reinforced its role in the alliance with the US and become a more consequential actor in regional security.” The concept of a free and open Indo-Pacific region was first introduced by Japan in 2016, before it was formalised by the US State Department in 2019. Beijing regards Washington’s Indo-Pacific strategy as a move to rally regional players like India, Australia and Japan against China’s rise. Japan, which sees China as a major rival, has been carefully and steadily pushing for like-minded countries to unite in countering Beijing’s growing influence and ambitions in the region. In September, Japan and India signed a deal allowing access to each other’s military bases for logistical support. Just weeks later, Suga used his first overseas visits as prime minister to promise stronger security and economic ties with Vietnam and Indonesia. This was followed in November with the signing of a reciprocal access agreement with Australia, allowing the two armed forces to carry out joint exercises, visit each other’s countries and potentially conduct military operations together. And, late last month, in a move that is likely to have touched a raw nerve in Beijing, Kishi invited his German counterpart Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer, to send a warship to East Asia. The visit could include the South China Sea, where Beijing’s extensive claims are contested by a number of small Southeast Asian countries, including Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia, Brunei and Indonesia. While Japan is a non-claimant in the strategically important waterway, 90 per cent of its oil and gas supplies travel through it from the Middle East, giving it deep concerns about China’s activities in the South China Sea. Last week Japan joined the US and its allies Australia, Britain, Germany and France in submitting a diplomatic note to the United Nations, rejecting Beijing’s baseline claims and condemning its efforts to restrict navigation and flyovers in the South China Sea. “Tokyo sees freedom of navigation and maritime stability as crucial to its prosperity,” Hardy-Chartrand said. “In addition, the Japanese government has drawn parallels between China’s approaches to the South China Sea and the East China Sea, where the two countries are embroiled in an increasingly bitter territorial dispute over the Senkaku/Diaoyu islands.” Hardy-Chartrand said Tokyo’s interest in the East China Sea meant it would not want to push Beijing too hard on the issue. “Japan will maintain its presence in the [South China Sea] but will likely remain cautious to avoid a strong reaction from China, as it may affect their territorial dispute in the East China Sea,” he said. Japan weighs in on South China Sea dispute, adding to pressure on Beijing Chen Xiangmiao, an associate researcher with the National Institute for South China Studies in the southern Chinese province of Hainan, said Japan would be an important part of the US push for an alliance-centred network to counter China. “That would include further cooperation on multiple fronts, from military, diplomacy, the legal sphere and politics, as well as public opinion in countries like Vietnam and the Philippines, to closely coordinate with the US in its South China Sea policy,” he said. Lam Peng Er, a senior research fellow at the National University of Singapore’s East Asian Institute, said Japan would also be concerned that China could one day declare an air defence identification zone in the South China Sea. “China has done that in the East China Sea, but if China declared in the South China Sea, Japan would be very concerned and very upset,” he said. Diaoyu/Senkaku islands dispute Japan has steadily stepped up its engagement with the South China Sea claimants – drilling is expected to start this year in a joint offshore energy project between Japanese companies and Vietnam, while the Philippines has acquired coastguard vessels and radar systems from Japan. Japanese vessels have also taken part in South China Sea exercises with forces from the US and the Philippines. But, Lam pointed out, while Japan’s engagement with the South China Sea claimants had been consistent, it was restricted in any military operation by its constitution, which prevents it from settling international disputes with armed force. There was no domestic consensus that any conflict in the South China Sea posed an imminent threat to Japan, he added. Lam also said there was a significant difference between Japan and the US in their approach to the region. “The Japanese concept of the Indo-Pacific centres on multilateral economic and diplomatic cooperation in a rule-based order, whereas the US strategy … emphasises a muscular balance of power against a rising China,” he said.More from South China Morning Post:Early signs from Biden White House of more balanced China policy aheadChina-US tensions: new American defence chief calls on Japan and South Korea to team up in Indo-PacificTokyo seeks US vow of support in East China Sea, as dispute with Beijing heats upThis article Japan key to US plan to rally allies against China in Indo-Pacific, observers say first appeared on South China Morning PostFor the latest news from the South China Morning Post download our mobile app. Copyright 2021.
Foreigners snapping up private apartments in Singapore declined to a 17-year low in 2020 as travel restrictions and lockdowns in various countries deterred them from coming to the city-state.
Unfailingly calm and courteous, America's new top diplomat Antony Blinken advocates a more humble approach to build alliances but, more than his boss, has advocated military power when human rights are in question.
HSBC is fully committed to its businesses in Hong Kong and helping residents “recover from challenges” despite being caught up in recent political rows, its boss has told British lawmakers, while dismissing suggestions the banking giant should pull out of the city in the wake of the national security law. At a meeting of the British parliament’s Foreign Affairs Committee on Tuesday afternoon, CEO Noel Quinn defended HSBC’s earlier controversial move to freeze the account of fugitive former opposition lawmaker Ted Hui Chi-fung and his family members, insisting the bank was legally obliged to take action after being notified by Hong Kong police. “We do not make freezing decisions based on political affiliation or activity,” Quinn said in his opening remarks. “It’s because we are obliged to, under request of police authorities, as they undertake their investigations.”Get the latest insights and analysis from our Global Impact newsletter on the big stories originating in China. Quinn emphasised that the London-based bank had only been in dialogue with local police and no other Chinese authorities, and that HSBC would be committing a criminal offence if it did not follow the order, which could put the institution and its customers at risk. He also insisted it would be of no benefit for the bank to walk away from Hong Kong despite what the politicians called a worsening political climate in the city. “I am not in Hong Kong purely because of the profit,” Quinn said. “It’s not a matter for me whether I choose China over the UK or China over another political system. My motive is 100 per cent about helping people in Hong Kong recover from the challenges they face, and I have to work within the legal framework I’m given in Hong Kong.” State-run media outlets blast new Bar Association head two days in a row But Quinn’s explanation did not seem to convince either the British lawmakers or Hui, with the latter slamming the top executive’s “evasive and hypocritical” attitude and vowing to continue to lobby for international sanctions on the bank. Following the meeting, Hong Kong’s Security Bureau condemned overseas politicians who it said were trying to exert pressure on local financial institutions adhering to laws on combating money laundering. The bureau also disputed suggestions a suspect’s consent was needed when police sought information from financial institutions as part of an investigation. The bureau’s statement did not mention the British parliament’s hearing nor did it name Hui. It maintained that police action and investigation were carried out strictly in accordance with the law and stressed the government fully supported financial institutions in their cooperation with police in anti-money-laundering investigations. “When investigating a case, the police would ask relevant individuals or institutions to obtain information relating to the detection of crime,” it said. “It is the statutory duty of police and has to be carried out in accordance with the law. But there are overseas politicians who have tried to exert pressure.” The parliamentary committee meeting was sparked by a row early last month in which Hui reported that his and his family members’ accounts at three banks – including HSBC – had been frozen after he fled the city while out on bail awaiting trial on charges tied to the 2019 anti-government protests and his actions in the legislature. Hui, who is now in Britain after fleeing in November, said HSBC had still failed to explain the legal basis to freeze the accounts, and whether it had acted professionally after receiving a “notification” from Hong Kong police. “HSBC’s attitude was evasive, hypocritical and self-contradicting in [Tuesday’s] hearing,” Hui wrote on his Facebook page hours after the parliamentary meeting. “Having made its stance clear that it supports the national security law, HSBC has shown that it is willing to be used for oppressing the freedom of Hong Kong with actual actions.” Hui was referring to Quinn’s attempt to defend Peter Wong Tung-shun, the bank’s deputy chairman and Asia-Pacific chief executive, who signed a petition last year in support of Beijing’s imposition of the national security law, which bans secession, subversion, terrorism and collusion with a foreign country or external elements to endanger national security. Hongkongers who fled to Britain early have no regrets “Peter was not advocating for a particular party or policy,” Quinn said. “It was not a political statement on his behalf, it was a statement that he was asking for the security situation in Hong Kong to be addressed, after experiencing 18 months of progressive decline that accumulated in an extended period of riots and violence.” He added Wong was among many other business leaders, as well as 2.9 million residents, who signed the petition, saying the drive only aimed to seek a resolution to the security concerns in Hong Kong. The pro-establishment camp said nearly 3 million people signed the petition last June. HSBC, which counts Hong Kong as its largest market, has come under attack from critics at home and abroad who accuse it of kowtowing to Beijing. At Tuesday’s meeting, Labour Party member of parliament Graham Stringer asked if HSBC had ever considered withdrawing from the city. “Is there any point at which what is happening in a country where you are carrying out your banking activities is so awful and distasteful that you will consider withdrawing your business or taking some other actions?” he asked. Quinn replied that the bank had never considered moving out of Hong Kong, which it had served for more than 150 years, despite the new geopolitical challenges. But he admitted the city’s legal structure was “changing”, and that the bank had no choice but to comply with the national security law, imposed by Beijing on June 30 last year. He also acknowledged there would be conflicts between the laws of different countries, posing challenges for the bank, which had to carry out its own legal analysis and oblige appropriately and carefully. Quinn also refrained from commenting on Hong Kong’s political situation, repeatedly claiming he was not a politician but someone who “served customers”. Apart from Hui, Good Neighbour North District Church, which had volunteers who offered help to protesters, also accused HSBC of freezing the accounts of its now ex-pastor and his wife. This was not the first time that accounts linked to the protest movement were frozen. In 2019, the banking giant faced a backlash for closing a corporate account used to raise funds for Spark Alliance HK to support protest-related activities, months after the anti-government unrest started. Ted Hui accuses HSBC of ‘embezzling’ his money by freezing his credit cards Hong Kong protesters also called for a boycott of the bank after it issued a statement last summer supporting the enactment of the national security law, which granted new powers to police to request institutions hand over sensitive data during investigations. Last month, Secretary for Security John Lee Ka-chiu defended the police’s order to freeze Hui’s bank account, which the force alleged was connected to a money-laundering case involving an “absconding Hongkonger” accused of misappropriating money from a crowdfunding campaign. Hui had earlier insisted all the money he raised online for a planned private prosecution of police officers had been saved in his law firm’s bank account. Earlier this month, Quinn wrote to Hui personally to explain why HSBC froze his and his family’s credit cards and bank accounts in December, saying it had no choice but to do so at the behest of Hong Kong police. Hui dismissed the explanation as irresponsible.This article HSBC boss defends move to freeze accounts of fugitive ex-lawmaker Ted Hui, tells British MPs bank is committed to Hong Kong first appeared on South China Morning PostFor the latest news from the South China Morning Post download our mobile app. Copyright 2021.
The largest bank in Singapore, DBS was named the ‘World’s Best Bank’ in 2019. If you’re a loyal DBS/POSB customer and have no plans to switch banks, here are the credit cards worth your salt. As the economy grapples with the plunge in consumer spending, […] The post Loyal DBS/POSB Customers: Which Credit Card Should You Add To Your Wallet? appeared first on SingSaver Blog - We Compare, You Save.
A group of 12 individuals who gathered during Phase 1 of Singapore’s reopening to celebrate a birthday were each fined between $2,000 and $3,500.
A Singaporean teenager planned to attack two mosques in the city-state on the anniversary of a massacre of Muslim worshippers in New Zealand, authorities said Wednesday.
Somalia is under growing pressure to explain the fate of soldiers whose families fear they were secretly deployed from training camps in neighbouring Eritrea to fight in Ethiopia's northern Tigray region.
Beijing’s state-run media has hit out at the new head of the Hong Kong Bar Association for a second day in a row, accusing him of having “lost professionalism and rationality” over remarks suggesting he would seek changes to the city’s national security law. One commentary, published in People’s Daily on Monday and titled “Do not let the political prejudice of the Bar Association ruin Hong Kong’s rule of law”, accused the body of becoming “more politicised in recent years, making use of its influence in society to abet activities that cause mayhem in Hong Kong”. The article was referring to the association’s statements issued during the 2019 social unrest that were critical of the police’s handling of protesters.Get the latest insights and analysis from our Global Impact newsletter on the big stories originating in China. The piece went on to say the move by the legal body was a departure from the spirit of the rule of law and a challenge to the essence of the “one country, two systems” policy. New head of top legal body wants government to amend national security law A separate commentary on China Daily on Tuesday, titled “Time for Bar Association to embrace political realism”, stated: “For any groups or parties to play a role in Hong Kong’s socioeconomic and political development, they must recognise and respect China’s sovereign powers over the region. “The Bar Association’s new chairman, Paul Harris, seems yet to realise this political reality.” The article also criticised the association for staying silent about the violence that gripped the city during the months-long anti-government protests. Harris, a long-time human rights barrister, was elected the new chairman of the association last week, succeeding Philip Dykes. Upon his election, Harris said he would explore the possibility of “getting the Hong Kong government to agree to some modifications” to the Beijing-imposed security legislation, referring to provisions he characterised as being at odds with rights guaranteed under the Basic Law. Harris said he hoped that by amending the national security law, Hong Kong could convince foreign countries to reinstate extradition agreements with the city, noting the suspension of such pacts following the law’s institution only made it easier for fugitives to move around. The People’s Daily article called Harris’ remarks “arrogant”, saying the national security law was in line with the city’s mini-constitution, the Basic Law, and flatly insisting the local government had no power to amend it. Arrest of opposition figures a ‘fairly obvious’ abuse of law, says new head of Bar Association “One also can’t help getting annoyed by such [a low] level of professionalism,” it said. Responding to the pieces, Harris reiterated that he had never condoned the violent protests of 2019, and continued to hold out hope that elements of the security law could be changed. “I have always supported demonstrations only so long as they are peaceful and am deeply opposed to violence,” he said. As for the law, he added: “I would hope that [the government] is open to dialogue with the community in Hong Kong and prepared to make proposals to the [central government] if it is itself persuaded that changes are desirable. “Of course we all understand that the final decision is for the [National People’s Congress Standing Committee].” He also addressed the accusations of politicisation in recent years, saying: “The constitution of the Bar Association requires it to defend the rule of law. Successive chairmen have always done so, from long before Philip Dykes’ tenure.” Former Bar Association chairman Ronny Tong Ka-wah, now a government cabinet member, also came to Harris’ defence. “I would have thought if he puts forward a view as to whether some law should be amended, I don’t see anything wrong with it,” he said. Outgoing Bar Association chair calls for renewing of contacts with Beijing But, Tong added: “I am worried that the [association] is drifting farther and farther away from maintaining a good relationship with its counterpart on the mainland, as the Hong Kong Bar needs to develop our practice on the mainland.” Asked if he was worried his stance could affect relations between the Bar Association and Beijing, Harris said: “I have not taken a confrontational stance. I have not opposed having a national security law. I have said some parts of it cause problems and I favoured amendment … It is the pro-Beijing media which has interpreted my mild remarks, reflecting the views of very many of my colleagues, as confrontational.” Alan Leong Kah-kit, a barrister and the chairman of the opposition Civic Party, said Harris and the Bar Association were only doing what legal practitioners should do. “We are only reminding everybody how the [Hong Kong special administrative region] is supposed to work. If issuing such reminders is political, so be it,” said Leong, who is also a former Bar Association chairman.More from South China Morning Post:New head of top Hong Kong legal body wants government to amend national security law so countries will reinstate extradition agreementsHSBC boss defends move to freeze accounts of fugitive ex-lawmaker Ted Hui, tells British MPs bank is committed to Hong KongHong Kong national security law: Pompeo, Raab and the meddling West should mind their own businessThis article National security law: Chinese state-run media blasts new Hong Kong Bar Association head for two days in a row over comments first appeared on South China Morning PostFor the latest news from the South China Morning Post download our mobile app. Copyright 2021.
One of the appeals of the HDB loan is the higher LTV of up to 90%. But did you know not everyone is eligible to loan the maximum amount? Read about it here.