A senior mainland Chinese official in Hong Kong has compared the city to a car driving down a dangerous road, and said the drastic overhaul of its electoral system would ensure it returned to a safer route.
Tan Tieniu, a deputy director of the central government’s liaison office in the city, also rejected suggestions the move was a step backwards for democracy, arguing there were many forms of democracy and it was not only about one-person-one-vote.
“If you are driving a car and you see that the road you have been taking is getting more difficult and dangerous, will you still follow the route? For certain, you will take a turn and return to a safe and correct road … I do not think it is very difficult to understand,” he said.
Do you have questions about the biggest topics and trends from around the world? Get the answers with SCMP Knowledge, our new platform of curated content with explainers, FAQs, analyses and infographics brought to you by our award-winning team.
Tan was addressing a seminar organised by the Chinese General Chamber of Commerce, one of the city’s most prominent business groups, on Wednesday. The two-hour event summed up the discussion during the annual sessions of the National People’s Congress (NPC) and the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference held in Beijing last month.
At the closing of the NPC’s annual session on March 11, the national legislature passed a resolution to overhaul Hong Kong’s electoral system to ensure only “patriots” could rule the city.
It reduces directly elected seats in the legislature while giving new power to the heavily pro-Beijing Election Committee, which was originally tasked with selecting the city’s chief executive, to vet and elect candidates to the Legislative Council.
Officials say the measures were needed to establish “democracy with Hong Kong characteristics”. But critics say the move would further quash opposition voices.
Tan said Beijing’s approach showed how much the central government cared about the city and its determination in implementing the “one country, two systems” policy.
“It is important to make sure we are heading in the right direction. If we are going along a wrong direction, all the efforts we have made will go down the drain,” Tan told the seminar, which was also streamed live online.
“Democracy cannot be one-size-fits-all. I think I can probably say it openly that ‘one man, one vote’ is not equal to democracy. And democracy is not only about ‘one man, one vote’. There are many forms of democracy. The most important is whether the form of democracy adopted is conducive to the development of a country and the society and can result in good governance.”
At the annual session, the NPC also approved the 14th five-year plan, which sets out the country’s main economic and political goals for 2021-25.
The plan pledges to continue to support Hong Kong to enhance its status as an international financial, transport and aviation and trade centre, and to deepen its cooperation with mainland cities under the Greater Bay Area, a plan aimed at turning Hong Kong, Macau and nine Guangdong cities into a finance and technological powerhouse.
Tan urged Hong Kong to grab the opportunities offered by the nation’s development blueprint.
“To be proactive is important. Because not only you can see the opportunities, others also can see them,” Tan said.
Tam Yiu-chung, Hong Kong’s sole delegate to the NPC Standing Committee, also spoke at the webinar.
Under reform plans endorsed by Beijing, the pro-establishment camp will become the dominant force in the city’s politics. It remains unclear whether the opposition camp will still field candidates to run for the Legco election, or how many will be approved by an influential vetting committee, which will be created to make sure that election hopefuls pose no threat to national security.
Tam said under the new system, pro-establishment politicians must keep improving themselves because they could not blame their opposition rivals for the city’s woes any more.
“If we take a carefree attitude because we think the opposition camp has been washed up, people will blame us,” he said. “In the past there was the opposition camp, but now that the opposition has gone, people will ask why we still cannot serve them better or better help the government in improving people’s lives.
“We need to give a good performance to show that the new system of ‘patriots govern Hong Kong’ can really work and can help solve social problems. Otherwise, we shall also be in trouble.”
More from South China Morning Post: