Increase in coronavirus infections means Christmas will be 'tough' this year, Sage member warns
Christmas will be “tough” and “not the usual celebration” a top Sage scientist has said, as he appeared to call on ministers to be honest with the public.
Professor Sir Jeremy Farrar, director of the Wellcome Trust, said winter would be a very difficult period, with extra time indoors fuelling more infections and a vaccine unlikely to come online in time to make a significant difference.
A leading member of the Government’s Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies, Sir Jeremy said ministers should have ordered a national temporary “circuit breaker” lockdown one month ago to have kept control of the outbreak.
He told Sky News’ Sophie Ridge: “The ONS (Office for National Statistics) survey, which is the best data in the country at the moment, shows that 27,000 people are getting this infection every day. But that was until the October 10.
“Today it will be over 50,000, just as the CMO (England’s chief medical officer) Chris Whitty and (the Government’s chief scientific adviser) Sir Patrick Vallance suggested some three weeks ago.
“It would be at 50,000 new cases across the country every single day, and that’s almost exactly where we are.”
Asked about Christmas, Prof Farrar said he does not believe a vaccine will be ready in time for the festive period.
Sir Jeremy added: “Christmas will be tough this year. I don’t think it’s going to be the usual celebration it is, and all families coming together, I’m afraid.
“I think we have to be honest and realistic and say that we are in for three to six months of a very, very difficult period.
“The temperatures drop, we are all indoors more often, we have the other infections that come this time of year.
“It’s much better for us to be upfront and honest now, and say we are in for a really difficult time, but there is light at the end of the tunnel.”
Prof Farrar said a short national lockdown known as a circuit-breaker is needed to reduce transmission rates, as previously recommended by Sage in September.
He said the “best time” to have introduced the temporary lockdown would have been around September 20, but added “it was never too late”.
He said: “The second best time to do this is now, and the worst time to do this is at the end of November when things would have really got considerably worse.
“So it’s never too late, it’s better to do it now than in a month’s time.” In regard to a potential vaccine and effective treatments, Prof Farrar said he believes they are “three to six months away”.
Meanwhile, Dr Alison Pittard, dean of the Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine in London, later told Sky News’ Sophie Ridge that doctors’ evolving understanding of the novel coronavirus has dramatically increased the survival rate.
She said some doctors’ haste to mechanically ventilate patients at the start of the pandemic might have contributed to the higher rate of death in spring compared to now.
At the start of the pandemic, just 66 per cent of people in hospital with coronavirus survived, compared to 84 per cent in August.
Dr Pittard said: “Initially we used to put patients straight on to mechanical ventilation – so we would bring them to intensive care, sedate them and put them on ventilators. “But we have slowly started to realise that perhaps we could manage some patients without doing that.”
