Here's What We Know About How The Coronavirus Crisis Began

Much is unknown about the coronavirus currently sweeping the globe. We know that it is deadly and highly contagious, but we don’t know why some people infected with the virus show terrible symptoms while others show none at all, or why children have a better time recovering.

Researchers also know that the virus originated in China, but they have many questions about how it emerged. Sensational reports have given a boost to the idea that the virus might have been an escaped lab experiment due to lax safety and security measures ― an idea that President Donald Trump, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and others in the White House keep pushing.

But given what we know about this coronavirus, that theory is an extremely unlikely one. Scientists may not fully understand the nature of the global outbreak of COVID-19, the illness caused by the virus, but there are plenty of reasons to believe it did not stem from a lab accident or some kind of clandestine government cover-up.

Here’s what we know now.

Horseshoe bats have been implicated in previous coronavirus outbreaks. (Photo: Remus86 via Getty Images)
Horseshoe bats have been implicated in previous coronavirus outbreaks. (Photo: Remus86 via Getty Images)

Scientists agree that the new coronavirus came from bats.

Researchers already know that the new virus, called 2019-nCoV, has a genetic makeup very similar to those of other known bat viruses ― namely the ones that caused SARS and MERS, two deadly coronaviruses that began spreading in 2002 and 2012, respectively. SARS, which stands for severe acute respiratory syndrome, was first reported in China, while MERS, or Middle East respiratory syndrome, was first reported in Saudi Arabia.

A Feb. 3 paper published in the journal Nature concluded that the new virus is “96% identical at the whole-genome level to a bat coronavirus,” based on its genome sequence.

Dr. Chris Beyrer, an epidemiology professor at Johns Hopkins, told HuffPost via Zoom that the virus’s natural origins were beyond dispute.

“Once we had the full genome sequence, it lines up so closely with SARS and with MERS there’s no ― that is not in debate. This is a bat virus,” he said.

Bats are known for being natural reservoirs of many viruses. The new virus probably came from Chinese horseshoe bats, a small variety with a flattened, leaflike nose.

There is no evidence the virus was engineered in a lab.

A widely cited March 17 paper in the journal Nature said it was “improbable” that the new virus had “emerged through laboratory manipulation of a related ... coronavirus.”

“Nobody made it. Nobody used a computer to design it and synthesize the parts,” Dr. Robert Garry, professor of microbiology and immunology at Tulane Medical School and an author of the paper, told HuffPost.

Essentially, if someone were to engineer a contagious virus, he would not start from scratch. He would take a virus that is already known to be pathogenic in humans and tweak it. But the new virus is not genetically close enough to any of the other pathogenic coronaviruses we know about, such as SARS or MERS, for that explanation to fit.

“We just wouldn’t get to this virus starting with any virus that was known, you know, at the time,” Garry said.

The closest thing scientists have found to the new virus is a 96% genetic match. That sounds pretty close until you consider that even a 3% or 4% genetic gap represents many, many years of change.

“You couldn’t do that in a cell culture experiment or even an animal passage experiment,” Garry said. “It still amounts to several hundred nucleotides ― like [600] to 800 nucleotides ― and you can’t get there with manipulation in cell culture or pasture animals. It’s just not going to change the virus that much. So this is something that’s taken place in nature over many decades.”

Dr. Kristian Andersen, a professor of immunology and microbiology at Scripps Research and another author on the paper, also discouraged the idea that the virus had been man-made, saying in a statement, “We can firmly determine that SARS-CoV-2” ― another name for the virus ― “originated through natural processes.”

To Dr. Yvonne Maldonado, a professor of pediatrics and infectious diseases at Stanford University, the idea that this virus is a synthesized bioweapon amounts to nothing more than a silly conspiracy theory.

“The science shows that this came from animals,” she said.

Pangolins are said to be the most illegally trafficked mammal on Earth. (Photo: ASSOCIATED PRESS)
Pangolins are said to be the most illegally trafficked mammal on Earth. (Photo: ASSOCIATED PRESS)

Experts theorize that it jumped from bats to an intermediary creature before infecting humans.

A prevailing theory is that the virus made its way from bats to people via another animal, largely based on the earlier outbreaks of SARS and MERS.

The virus that caused the 2002-03 SARS panic is thought to have jumped from bats to civets ― a catlike animal native to Asia and Africa ― before jumping to humans. The virus that caused MERS likely jumped from bats to camels before infecting its first humans.

Researchers including a team studying the virus at the University of Michigan have suggested that the intermediary animal in the current pandemic might be the pangolin, an unusual mammal prized for its meat and its scales, which are used in some traditional Chinese medicine. Smugglers are widely known to trade the creatures despite a ban on trafficking in China and around the world.

But scientists are far from certain that pangolins were involved in the current crisis. One study cited by The Guardian looked at cell receptors that allow the virus to infect humans; pangolins were found to have similar receptors to humans’, but so did pigs, civets, cows, buffalo, goats, sheep and pigeons.

It’s also possible, although not as likely based on available evidence, that the virus jumped straight from bats to humans.

Chinese officials have said the virus likely began spreading to humans at a wildlife market in Wuhan.

The Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market is a wildlife and seafood market in the industrial city of Wuhan that brings humans into close contact with all sorts of animals, which are in close contact with each other. In addition to typical seafood options, it’s known to offer a wide array of live and butchered wild animals, including baby crocodiles and ostriches. Scientific American called such markets “perfect viral melting pots” in a recent feature on a renowned Chinese bat virus researcher.

“Typically, because the bats are the smallest animals, and they are airborne animals, their cages are typically above the others,” Beyrer said. As a result, urine and feces from the bats can easily contaminate the other animals.

He added: “And the people are very important because the people who handle these animals, who slaughter and butcher them, are all the same people.”

A widely cited Jan. 24 paper in the journal The Lancet said that of the first 41 COVID-19 patients, 27 of them ― nearly two-thirds ― had been exposed to that particular seafood market. The genetic material of the virus was also found at the market ― more evidence that it provided a launchpad for the virus. From there, it continued to spread between people.

Given the potential of wildlife markets for spreading new diseases, the United Nations is calling on China to shutter them for good.

It’s worth noting that the term “wet market” has been widely used to describe the Huanan market, but most wet markets do not sell wild animals, which is why the term “wildlife market” is more accurate. Wet markets are named for the ice used to keep seafood and other items cool.

A worker in Wuhan, China, takes away an escaped giant salamander just caught in Huanan Seafood Market on Jan. 27. The market was shut down due to its connection to the first 2019-nCoV cases. (Photo: Barcroft Media via Getty Images)
A worker in Wuhan, China, takes away an escaped giant salamander just caught in Huanan Seafood Market on Jan. 27. The market was shut down due to its connection to the first 2019-nCoV cases. (Photo: Barcroft Media via Getty Images)

But there is also some reason to believe the market was not the only starting place, and the virus had begun circulating earlier.

The seafood market scenario is not perfect.

The earliest known COVID-19 patient started showing symptoms in Wuhan on Dec. 1, 2019, but he did not have any known connection to the market, according to the Lancet paper, which was authored by a large group of Chinese researchers.

“No epidemiological link was found between the first patient and later cases,” the paper noted.

And although the bulk of the first 41 patients had contact with the market, generally as workers there, 14 patients had no link to it.

One of the authors of the Lancet paper, Bin Cao, told Science magazine in a late-January email: “Now it seems clear that [the] seafood market is not the only origin of the virus. But to be honest, we still do not know where the virus came from.”

China has also suppressed information on the virus that could provide clarity. Back in January, a doctor who tried sounding the alarm about an impending crisis was forced to sign a document admitting to spreading “rumors.” Others who spoke out in the beginning of the crisis have vanished. China withheld alarming data about infections among health care workers for more than a month, and excluded asymptomatic patients from its total infection tally.

Maldonado said her colleagues in Wuhan have mainly been focused on dealing with the clinical aspects of the crisis so far, and theorized that “the story will probably evolve over time.”

“Most of the early cases did come from that marketplace,” she said, but noted that “we don’t know [if] there may have been earlier cases” that came from elsewhere.

A splashy new theory posits that the virus escaped during some kind of accident at a lab where researchers in Wuhan were studying natural bat coronaviruses.

U.S. intelligence officials are reportedly looking into whether the current crisis was touched off by an accident at a lab where scientists study bat viruses.

“We are actively and vigorously tracking down every piece of information we get on this topic and we are writing frequently to update policymakers,” an intelligence official told Yahoo News in mid-April. The outlet noted that the intelligence community “has not come down on any one theory.”

A Washington Post article by columnist Josh Rogin described alarming warnings back in 2017 about conditions at Wuhan labs:

Two years before the novel coronavirus pandemic upended the world, U.S. Embassy officials visited a Chinese research facility in the city of Wuhan several times and sent two official warnings back to Washington about inadequate safety at the lab, which was conducting risky studies on coronaviruses from bats. The cables have fueled discussions inside the U.S. government about whether this or another Wuhan lab was the source of the virus — even though conclusive proof has yet to emerge.

Right now, scientists think it’s pretty unlikely.

First of all, the fact that bat viruses are being studied in China does not automatically mean the labs are up to something nefarious.

“There are a number of labs in the world that are studying coronaviruses and for which we should all be deeply grateful,” Beyrer said. “We know that there are many, many more [coronaviruses] in nature. Many of them are pathogenic for humans. They need to be studied.”

It may be technically possible for safety protocols to have broken down so badly that a new coronavirus broke free, Beyrer acknowledged, but there is no evidence that happened here. France released a statement to combat the idea “recently circulating in the United States press,” stating unequivocally that “there is to this day no factual evidence” supporting the theory the virus escaped from a lab.

It might take a while for scientists to be sure how and when the pandemic started, but the market seems to have played a large part in its widespread transmission.

There’s also the matter of the pangolin (or other intermediary animal).

“Nobody studying bat coronaviruses would keep pangolins in their lab,” Beyrer said. “They’re not a research animal. That’s further evidence that we need to keep focusing on the abattoir.”

But it’s going to take a while to figure out how this virus evolved and why it’s so deadly in humans. It’s also an environmental problem.

“That question may take several months or longer, as people will have to try to find more animals, and look for virus, and sequence those viruses, and then understand how those genes and those viruses work, and how those are different from the genes in the human virus, and then try to understand how those create symptoms,” Maldonado said.

The current crisis may also prove to be a watershed moment for the global wildlife trade, which thrives on human desire to consume exotic game for food or medicine regardless of the potential cost. Bats are known to carry many viruses that don’t cause them illness. But if they are coming into regular contact with humans and other animals that are not part of their natural habitat, that gives these viruses an opening. Human activity has also forced different bat species to live much closer together than they otherwise would, allowing viruses that normally live in one species to spread to others.

“I think it’s really easy for us to forget that people are encroaching on animal habitats, and there may be consequences to that,” Maldonado said.

Love HuffPost? Become a founding member of HuffPost Plus today.

A HuffPost Guide To Coronavirus


Environmental Destruction Brought Us COVID-19. What It Brings Next Could Be Far Worse.

Also on HuffPost

This article originally appeared on HuffPost.