Advertisement

New York Times pulls journalists out of Hong Kong due to threat of 'sweeping' new security law

Copies of the New York Times are seen on sale at a news stand in Hong Kong on Wednesday. The paper said it would transfer some of its staff out of the city because of the uncertainties around the new national security law: AP
Copies of the New York Times are seen on sale at a news stand in Hong Kong on Wednesday. The paper said it would transfer some of its staff out of the city because of the uncertainties around the new national security law: AP

The New York Times has said it is transferring its Asia bureau out of Hong Kong because of the possible implications of the strict national security laws imposed by China in the city.

In a memo to staff, the paper’s editors said the “sweeping” new legislation would create “uncertainty” for journalists working in Hong Kong.

The move will see all of the Times’ digital team in Hong Kong, journalists who deal with breaking news while offices in London and New York are offline, transfer to Seoul in South Korea over the course of the next year.

The paper’s reporters and correspondents covering Hong Kong itself will remain in the city and editors said they have “every intention of maintaining and even increasing our coverage of the city’s transformation, as well as using it as a window on China”.

In total, the decision will impact about a third of the Times’ staff in Hong Kong, with other departments including local print production expected to remain.

Hong Kong’s new national security law, passed on 30 June, defines and bans subversion, secession, terrorism and foreign collusion.

Activists have expressed concern that the offence of “subversion” in particular could be used by the authorities to penalise the work of critical journalists, human rights activists and defence advocates, something that is a more common practice on the mainland.

“China's sweeping new national security law in Hong Kong has created a lot of uncertainty about what the new rules will mean to our operation and our journalism,” management told staff in the memo on Tuesday, according to a report on the paper’s own website.

“We feel it is prudent to make contingency plans and begin to diversify our editing staff around the region.”

The New York Times was among the American news outlets caught up in the worsening of diplomatic relations between the US and China in recent months, with a number of the paper’s staff being deported from Beijing. China said it was a response to Washington imposing tighter restrictions on Chinese journalists operating out of the US.

Like their colleagues from the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal who were similarly treated, the deported journalists were also prevented from relocating to Hong Kong - a decision which was seen as unprecedented at the time.

In 2018, Hong Kong refused to renew the working visa of the prominent Financial Times journalist Victor Mallet. Mallet was the vice-president of the Hong Kong Foreign Correspondents’ Club, which angered Beijing by chairing a talk involving a figure advocating for Hong Kong’s independence. Later, Mallet was also refused entry into Hong Kong as a tourist.

The New York Times said its decision came as a number of its journalists were already experiencing work permit issues in Hong Kong, a city that has been seen as a bastion of freedom of the press as well as a global financial powerhouse. With Donald Trump’s announcement on Tuesday that the US will no longer give preferential trading status to the city, both those statuses now appear under threat.

“Hong Kong has been a leader in supporting the rights of a free press in Asia for decades,” said Times spokesperson Ari Isaacman Bevacqua. “It is essential that it continues to do so.”

Read more

China denounces ‘illegal’ Hong Kong primary amid pro-activist results

Trump turns Hong Kong announcement into campaign-style attack on Biden

Hong Kong Disneyland to close again just one month after opening

Hong Kong to close schools from Monday following coronavirus spike

China accuses Australia of ‘gross interference’ over treaty suspension