YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    NUS students receptive to proposed fee hike

    Students set to enter the National University of Singapore (NUS) in August said its plans to increase tuition fees for the incoming cohort are reasonable but underscored that the hike should not be exorbitant so that university education would remain affordable.

    Those Yahoo! Singapore spoke to added that the university must also ensure local students are placed as a priority.

    NUS student and president of Kent Ridge Hall Nash Ng, 23, said he has no objection to the fee increase as long as the rationale behind it is reasonable and properly explained to students, and if policies are introduced to mitigate the effects of such an increase.

    “If the increased is justified and communicated transparently to the students, with measures put into place to buffer its effects, then yeah, I would be receptive to it,” he said. 

    Ng told Yahoo! Singapore that in a meeting with about 50 student leaders on Wednesday evening, NUS Provost Tan Eng Chye said the fee hikes are necessary to maintain a “decent standard of education” in NUS, due to staffing concerns.

    An email sent to some student leaders prior to the meeting had informed them beforehand that “the tuition fees for both undergraduates and graduate students will be revised”.

    The university did not disclose the exact amount or percentage of the increase and when contacted a NUS spokesperson said, “NUS has had a cohort-based tuition fee structure since Academic Year 2008/2009. The tuition fees for Academic Year 2012/2013 will be announced in due course.”

    It is understood that the proposal to raise tuition fees has been sent to the Ministry of Education (MOE) for evaluation but the university did not mention when this took place. It also did not say when the ministry will get back to them on this issue.

    In January last year, all three of the country’s public universities – Singapore Management University, Nanyang Technological University and NUS – announced increases in tuition fees between three and six percent.

    NUS itself raised fees by four percent which means that a student studying at the arts and social sciences faculty in academic year 2011 would have to pay $7,170. This was an increase of $280 from the previous tuition fee of $6,890 in 2010.

    Sharing the same sentiment, Lee Min Shing, 21, who is waiting enrollment into NUS School of Design and Environment in August this year, feels that the increase in tuition fees will have to happen. “This raise is inevitable because of the rising costs of education, and we have to take into account inflation, too,” he said.

    However, he added that the raise should not be too exorbitant, as “local students have to be put first, and education should still be affordable”.

    Some confusion

    Still, some students due to enroll in NUS in August this year are confused whether the plans to increase tuition fees would be applicable to them.

    Those who applied in 2010 but have had to defer their studies due to National Service (NS) are unclear if they would be affected by the fee increase.

    Chua Yao An, 20, who deferred his university entry to 2012 due to NS said, “I think it’s (fee increase) not so bad, since NUS fees are comparatively lower than other foreign universities for a similar quality of education¬. But I heard that NUS promised not to increase fees for NS guys and use the fee benchmark where we got our acceptance two years ago, so I’m not sure if it applies to me.”

    Student leaders present at the meeting also said that instead of talking about tuition fee increase, the Provost addressed the issue of increasing financial aid for NUS. The fee hike was only brought up during the question and answer session, after the dialogue.

    Nash Ng said, “My guess is that financial aid is inextricably linked to fee hike. If there is going to be a fee hike, there needs to be measures to take care of students who fall though the system.”

    Meanwhile both NTU and SMU said that tuition fee adjustments, if any, will be announced in due course.

    How do you feel about this article?

     
    • BrainDead  •  3 months ago
      What is the relevance here? Who are paying for the students' education? The students or their parents? If it is the latter, is it not more important to hear from them? Are they as receptive of the fee hike? LOL.
    • ZigZag  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      Please reveal how many places reserved for the foreign students, how many are given scholarships, how much allowances they get each month ? It is not fair or right to use tax payers money to help foreign students at the expense of local born true Singaporeans ? Remember PM said, Singaporeans will be first ! please put money where the mouth is !
      Singaporeans first, Singaporeans first !!!
      • Mer 3 months ago
        Local universities ironically, are quite likely, the source of much of the influx of foreign trash into Singapore. It's such a disgust to know how many scholarships with monthly stipends exceeding SGD 3K have been wasted on them to churn out academic papers of little relevance to the progress of Singapore. Forget having universities with world class rankings, focus on national manpower training for goodness sake!!!!!
      • JonA 3 months ago
        hahaha I'm one of those foreign trash, who gets a monthly stipends but I get $2500. Singaporeans get $2700. Notice how every country has a PhD program for foreign students. I wonder how many jobs were created due to Singaporean startup companies from NUS and NTU? Quite alot so you are wrong to accuse us of producing academic papers. You are very ignorant.
      • Shin 3 months ago
        Yea, FT get 2500, Singaporeans get 3000. That's for PhD and in almost every country, PhD is paid, it's considered a low paid job actually. For undergrad, my friends said they got only $500/month with 6 years bond. If it's only 3 years bond then they got only $200. Govt entice the students to stay here permanently and perhaps converting to citizen. I know many who have converted especially if they get married and have babies here. IMO, it's not worth it to do undergrad here except if the students want to spend the rest of their life here.
    • Dico  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      An increase of $280 per year is reasonable.

      But the real problem is the enrollment where foreign students had high priority irregardless of grades. Many of these foreign students on scholarship don't have to pay a single cent and were given monthly allowances.

      When these foreign scholars graduate, many were given cushy jobs and high salaries to 'serve their bonds'!
      • True Blue S'porean 3 months ago
        Singaporean got to struggle & look for a job themselves.

        SO WHAT THE HELL ARE WE VOTING THEM FOR?
      • Shin 3 months ago
        Given a job with high salary? You know nothing then. They should find a job by themselves. My friend spent months here doing nothing coz he couldn't find job. Spent his parents money of course. Govt will release them if in 1 year they couldn't find a job. None of them are given a job by the govt....
      • Tan 3 months ago
        Scholars are overvalued... many had poor morals and EQ and cannot perform well in the real world. The 2 scholars recently embroiled in the "Mischief on duty" is just the tip of the ice berg. They aren't as good as they claim to be.
    • juliet  •  3 months ago
      quite a misleading headline...how many students did the reporters interview? did they interview the parents? those who were interviewed, r they on scholarships, from relatively wealthy families..i know of several families who are struggling to put their kids through nus and ntu...this increase in tuition fees will surely add to their daily battles with the rising costs of living...our children who are born and raised here should be given priorities when it comes to places and costs, not the foreigners..how many of these foreigners will stay here for long? a housewife in my group, her poly grad son was not given a place at nus even though he scored a gpa 3.8..the family is going to send him away to australia and they tell him never to come back, another family is selling their four room flat to fund another singaporean son to usa, and never to come back, they are fed up of unfair treatment of our sons (ns, reservist, pointless remedial training, yearly ippt, while the permanent residents don't have to do these duties)...we are losing our young talents, and being replaced by foreigners who will not be here forever...i know of a few ang moh permanent residents who r only here to milk the civil servants pay, cpf, bonuses, and they intend to go back to their birth countries in 10-15 years times to retire, and they boast openly about it, we can hear them chat and talk away in the foodcourt in our estate.....why's the loyalty? all at the expenses of our taxpayers' money! real messed up, this country of ours has become! our own people are not being given jobs, yet the 30 and 40somethings ang mohs from europe and elsewhere are given management jobs in teaching institutues and so on...it's not only the prcs and indians who are replacing us locals...there are so many ang mohs amongst us these days it is really worrying! the condos opposite my estate, we have never seen so many ang mohs before!
    • PingPong  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      Yeah! The fees hike is inevitable, so says the naive, insensible souls.
      How dumb & ignorant can these young people be.
      Our universities must be damn happy.
      Now they'll have no worry to raise the fees annually.
      How many actually know that our gahmen have been giving scholarships liberally to foreign students to study here for free while locals are made to pay and pay and pay higher fees?
      • terry 3 months ago
        they will only see it when they join the work force. Right now, they too comfortable and sheltered to know they are being screwed.
      • A Yahoo! User 3 months ago
        Do you expect your pay raise yearly? And this will increase the operation cost.
    • Crap!  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      The lack of transparency of this government is reaching unbelievable levels: why have there not been any response to the people's demand to know clearly how much foreign students they have invited to study in Sg universities at government (ie singapore taxpayers) expense and told us how much have they spent each year since 2000 on funding foreign students on scholarships to study in Singapore? How can parents here quietly accept and continue to vote for the PAP when their own children not only have to accept lower priority in entering universities but have to pay far higher fees than these PAP-sponsored foreign students? How does the PAP, who insist on bonds on Singapore students sent overseas on government scholarships, justify not bonding these foreign scholars? How many of them break bonds? Why is Philip Yeo not opening his big gap to sue those foreign scholarship holders who take up SG government scholarship and who break bonds?
      • PAP my foot 3 months ago
        I thought PAP dogs are more concerned on YSL's scandal and expecting it should be transparent.
      • Janas 3 months ago
        Talk so much sometimes is useless. For now, just resolve in your heart NEVER EVER to vote for the papies anymore!!
      • True Sporean 3 months ago
        Good questions, Crap. Education minister, your response appreciated.
    • Eug  •  3 months ago
      Another increase in basic necessity...
      What is the purpose of this useless govt when the SOP is to raise tuition fees, maid levies, COE, SLA prices, home prices, PUB, rental+++++++++

      Who dunno how to raise prices (pass the bucket) ??? Who ???
    • 团结就是力量  •  3 months ago
      So will the fee increased also depend on the number of foreigner getting scholarship?

      Those that pay the fee will be subsidising those foreigner?

      Foreigner that study here should be charged higher UNI fee.
    • adeem  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      the newspaper should interview the parents as they are the one paying. the students are so insentitive to their parents. so bragging! MOE should ask NUS and others to reduced cost and hope others will not follow the increment of fees. MOE or the government should keep tracks on all development and not leave to market forces as like porridge, it will simmer and should keep an eye or IT WILL OVERBOIL and causes unhappiness. the so called competitive singapore department should keep watch on this.
    • gnow  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      What rubbish is the NUS Provost saying? Isn't the current standard with regards to the staff decent enough? If they stop giving away scholarship to foreign student en masse, there would enough for all. MOE should not agree to a hike in the tuition fee.
    • Wealthy Assets  •  3 months ago
      @ In January last year, all three of the country’s public universities – Singapore Management University, Nanyang Technological University and NUS – announced increases in tuition fees between three and six percent

      Under the current PAP (MOE in this case ), everytime they want to increase they gave all sort of excues to justify. However they never tell you the cost and quality of the university

      Example the Accounting degree in Singapore against Korea, USA, UK ACCA etc

      Also when cost or service decrease example Coffee, Oil, SBS bus, Taxi etc .... they kept quiet and no adjustment on the fares hiked

      @ “I think it’s (fee increase) not so bad, since NUS fees are comparatively lower than other foreign universities for a similar quality of education¬. ....

      Here you can see an example of of singapore product under the PAP education system. They make an expensive items look cheap through producing ignorant student and PAP controlled media giving out misleading biased news

      Example compare singapore taxi with London, NY, HK instead of Taipei, Bangkok, KL , Beijin to justify teh fares hike n later rental
    • Platoon5  •  3 months ago
      MOE, pls be transparent on how many free scholarships awarded to foreign and locals students yearly?is this needed a 'blackbox' operation too, this ain't national defence issue...
    • Transformer  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      How come there are so many increase nowaday? School fee increase, COE increase, housing increase, LKY warned of population increase, and now LHL warned of taxes increase. What is going on? All increase except my pay!
    • Oopo oopo  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      Another profit organisation. This time a university
    • The Unwanted  •  3 months ago
      if you vote them do not complain.accept it.
    • Kumar  •  3 months ago
      hey come on guys they need to hike fees to get angmo proffessors so they need the money to party on weekends
    • SGGuard  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      There it goes again....the never ending increases are here again..and the next organisation to increase will be ??? dun tell you, hahahaha...
    • Miffy  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      Does it means Singaporean students have to pay more and they continue to give scholarships to foreigners. Not fair!!
    • Evered  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      No, not again. Is it not possible for the government to inject more funds into the universities? They spend so much on foreigners but not on Singaporeans? On top of it, less places for Singaporeans. A ridiculous joke? We seem to be working and living in the world's largest corporation which decides unilaterally what's best for it's employees.
    • A Yahoo! User  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      cheap labor aka prc prof are everywhr...why increase fees?

    Featured Blog Posts