India says China's Oppo evaded $551 million in import tax

·2-min read
FILE PHOTO: A woman walks by an Oppo logo at a shopping mall in Shanghai

NEW DELHI (Reuters) -An investigation by India's Directorate of Revenue Intelligence has found that Chinese smartphone maker Oppo evaded customs duty worth 43.9 billion rupees ($551 million), a government statement said on Wednesday.

Indian investigators found evidence that Oppo wrongfully used duty exemptions for items imported for use in mobile phone production, the statement said.

They also allege Oppo made royalty payments which were not added to the transaction value of imported goods, as required by Indian law, it added.

A notice "has been issued to Oppo India demanding (the) customs duty", the government said.

A spokesperson for Oppo, which is owned by China's BBK Electronics, said the company was reviewing the notice and would respond.

"We have a different view on the charges," the Oppo spokesperson said in a statement. "We believe it's an industry-wide issue many corporates are working on."

The spokesperson said: "We are going to reply the notice, presenting our side, and will be working further with the related government departments."

The Revenue Intelligence wing has also proposed penalties on Oppo India, its employees and Oppo China, the government statement said, without elaborating.

Many Chinese companies have struggled to do business in India after political tension ramped up following a border clash in 2020. India has cited security concerns in banning more than 300 Chinese apps since, and toughened rules on Chinese investment.

Action against Oppo comes amid growing scrutiny of Chinese smartphone makers.

The federal financial crime agency, the Enforcement Directorate, last week raided 48 locations of Vivo and its related entities, alleging that sale proceeds of Vivo India were transferred out of India to show losses and avoid paying taxes.

India smartphone market leader Xiaomi too has been under investigation, with the agency alleging it made illegal remittances abroad "in the guise of royalty" payments.

Both companies deny any wrongdoing.

(Reporting by Munsif Vengattil and Aditya Kalra in New Delhi; Editing by Louise Heavens, Jan Harvey and Jane Merriman)

Our goal is to create a safe and engaging place for users to connect over interests and passions. In order to improve our community experience, we are temporarily suspending article commenting