Singapore government should pass laws against fake news: Select Committee
UPDATE: This story has been updated to include the governmentās in-principle acceptance of the Select Committeeās recommendation for a multi-pronged approach to combat deliberate online falsehoods
Authorities in Singapore must be empowered to act against the perpetrators of deliberate online falsehoods, from disrupting the flow of ad revenue to imposing criminal sanctions, said a government-appointed committee on fake news.
Almost six months after a series of often combative public hearings on fake news, the Select Committee on Deliberate Online Falsehoods (DOFs) released its recommendations in a 317-page report on Thursday (20 September). The report was submitted to Parliament on Wednesday.
One of the recommendations of the 10-member panelās wide-ranging ā sometimes vaguely worded ā list was that the government āshould have the powers to swiftly disrupt the spread and influence of online falsehoodsā.
The committee also advised that legislation be passed to enable authorities to act against the purveyors of DOFs and to regulate tech giants such as Facebook and Twitter to be more accountable about the spread of fake news on their platforms.
The panel also urged the government to consider putting in place a framework for public education that would, among others, provide a curriculum for schools on āthe motivations and agendas of disinformation agents and their techniques and strategiesā.
Speaking at a press conference at Parliament on Thursday, committee member Janil Puthucheary noted that it was āa very hefty reportā that addressed āa live and serious threat for Singapore that threatens our national securityā.
Dr Puthucheary, who is a Senior Minister of State for Transport and Communications and Information, said āstrong measuresā were necessary as falsehoods travel further and faster and are much harder to dislodge. āThese sorts of problems can creep up on us unnoticed until it is too late,ā he added.
The report was issued after considering 170 written representations and 65 oral representations, as well as a seven-week public consultation. It addressed, among others, how DOFs have been used to sow discord and affect election outcomes, Singaporeās vulnerabilities in this arena and how countries like Germany and France have dealt with the issue.
The report also included a 13-page addendum on the committeeās exchanges with Human Rights Watch and Reporters Without Borders, which ultimately declined to appear before the Select Commitee, as well as historian Thum Ping Tjin.
Thum, who had accused the ruling Peopleās Action Party of being the main purveyor of fake news in Singapore, was questioned for six hours by the committee in March.
āFalsehoods can be definedā
All 10 members of the committee were present at the press conference, including Home Affairs and Law Minister K. Shanmugam. Pressed several times on when the government would respond to the committeeās recommendations, he would only say it was ānot appropriateā for the committee to comment, and that the government would give its response in due course.
Asked if the panel had deliberated on what the definition of a falsehood should be, Shanmugam was emphatic: āThe Select Committee has been quite clear: falsehoods are capable of definition, they have been defined in legislation, they have been defined in the courts and the Select Committee is quite comfortable that it can be defined. Shouldnāt be an issue.ā
But the minister also stressed that the committee was clear on the difference between publicly circulated communications and that which was āprivate and personalā and ādo not have a wide circulationā. He noted, āWhether itās an open platform or a closed platform, if youāre a sending a message to somebody and it doesnāt have a wider circulation and itās a purely private message about your family, then we should be careful about intervening in that.ā
Given that tech companies have been vigorously opposed to regulation, was the government concerned that this might put them at odds with the tech giants? Puthucheary responded that the authorities would continue engaging these companies. āIt is about what is the right approach to regulationā¦this engagement and negotiation has been going on, and we hope that it will lead to a positive outcome for them.ā
Governmentās response to Committeeās report
The government said it has accepted in-principle the committeeās recommendation for a multi-pronged approach to combat DOFs.
In a joint statement issued by the Ministry of Communications and Information and the Ministry of Law, the government said it āwill study the Committeeās report closely and work with stakeholders to roll out the non-legislative and legislative measures recommended by the Committee over the next few months.ā
Commending the committee for its ācomprehensive and thoughtful reportā, the government acknowledges the committeeās findings on the serious challenges and real risks posed by DOFs to the international community, including how they can harm national security and undermine a nationās sovereignty. The committee has also found that DOFs could affect a countryās social cohesion, incite public unrest and violence, and that Singapore is not immune to this āgrave threatā, the government said.
Related stories
Thum Ping Tjin lied to Select Committee, concludes fake news panel
Fake news could cause people to be disillusioned: Shanmugam
Facebook concerned about ārushā by Singapore to introduce law to combat fake news
K Shanmugam presses Facebook on lack of transparency over Cambridge Analytica saga