Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

 

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    SingaporeScene

    We fought a principled fight: SDP’s Vincent

    SDP's candidate Vincent Wijeysingha says the party's electoral campaigns solely touched on issues concerning Singaporeans. (Yahoo! photo/ Faris Mokhtar)SDP's candidate Vincent Wijeysingha says the party's electoral campaigns solely touched on issues concerning Singaporeans. …

    The Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) fought "a principled fight" as their electoral campaigns focused on the issues concerning Singaporeans, said Vincent Wijeysingha, who led the opposition party's team in the contest for the Holland-Bukit Timah group representation constituency (GRC).

    Speaking at the SDP's press conference held at the Quality Hotel early Sunday morning after election results were announced, the 41-year-old executive director of a non-governmental organisation said that the party has been able to offer Singaporeans a "coherent" programme that has ignited the interests and commitment of people.

    This was in contrast to the "less savoury" methods employed by the ruling People's Action Party (PAP), he added.

    Throughout the election campaign period, SDP has been pressing for alternative solutions to address issues such as the rising cost of living, education and healthcare. Earlier, it unveiled a shadow healthcare plan which aims to provide affordable medical services to Singaporeans.

    While acknowledging that the PAP has put up a "good fight", Dr Wijeysingha also took the opportunity to remind the elected representatives of the need to put the people at the centre of policy making.

    "I acknowledged as well that our opponents put up a good fight, and I would like to congratulate them.

    "But I would also like to ask them as a Singaporean, to bear in mind the poor in our midst, to bear in mind those people who have not benefited from the 14 and a half percent GDP, from rising asset values of their homes and to consider all Singaporeans as one.

    "This is a plea I make to the next parliament and the next cabinet, that they must govern this nation as one and they must not allow us to be divided according to the traditional devices that we have been subjected to," said Dr Wijeysingha.

    The SDP candidate for Holland-Bukit Timah GRC had led his team to garner 39.90 percent of the votes, not enough to defeat the incumbent People's Action Party team helmed by Dr Vivian Balakrishnan that won 60.10 percent of the votes.

    Meanwhile, SDP's secretary-general Chee Soon Juan said that the election is a "new beginning" for the party, referring to its quality of candidates and also the less confrontational image that it is projecting through the use of social media.

    Although the party failed to capture any seats, he said that it had also "won" in the process, comparing this year's much improved electoral results to that in the 2006 polls in which the party fared poorly.

    "We lost, but we won. We won the hearts of many Singaporeans in this campaign, we fought a gallant contest," said Chee.

    "We have seen a slate of candidates come on board, we have done everything that we could possibly have done,...to try to get our message across online. This is just the beginning.

    Saying that the party is able to build on the momentum from this year's election, Chee added that this results is also a lesson learnt for the PAP.

    "I think they would have to really look at what has happened and they must listen to the people.

    "And the people have shown that with the growing, burgeoning of the internet and flow of information, they (PAP) cannot do what they have done in the past, that's just not possible," he said.

    The SDP had fielded a total of eleven candidates, contesting in the Sembawang and Holland-Bukit Timah GRCs as well as the single-seat wards of Bukit Panjang and Yuhua.

    Although it won only 36.11 percent of the votes in Sembawang GRC, this was a marked improvement from the dismal showing in 2006 where it garnered only 23.30 percent of the votes.

    In the press conference, SDP candidate for Yuhua, Teo Soh Lung, was conspicuously absent with Chee revealing that she was "just physically, physically very tired" and had asked to be excused.

    This was clearly the case for the other candidates who were visibly exhausted — mentally and physically — from the "fierce" electoral campaigns over the past nine days.

    The party also reiterated the need to do a "post-mortem" to analyse their weaknesses and flaws that led to the failure of capturing a single seat in Parliament.

    "And certainly we want to capitalise on what we've gained, what we've learned from the electorate about our methods and how we serve the people in the next five years," said Dr Wijeysingha.

    When asked whether he has a personal message to Dr Balakrishnan, he simply sent congratulatory wishes and acknowledged the minister's "heavy" responsibilities of having to care for the poor.

    "I wish him all the very best, he has won the fight. It was a hard fought campaign, he has a difficult job, you know, caring for the poor of this community, it's a difficult job," said Dr Wijeysingha.

    "And as I said during the press conference, we need to put people at the centre of policy again. It's all right to talk about GDP, it's all right to talk about reserves but once you forget that all of those things are done in the service of people, then you have stopped being a leader."

    Follow Yahoo! News on Twitter and become a fan on Facebook.

    This article is published by Yahoo! Southeast Asia Pte. Ltd., 60 Anson Road #13-01 Mapletree Anson, Singapore, 079914

     

    159 comments

    • jason  •  1 year 0 months ago
      Holland BT not too bad result. considering the affluence of the residents there. Dr vincent push for a minimum wage, this would generally dont boil down well with the resident there who some own factories or business. nevertheless there are at least 40% who are willing to sacrifice for a greater cause.
      • Supercool 1 year 0 months ago
        I will speak up for some family members from HBT (non-heartlanders) who are extremely well off and comfortable that voted for opposition. In fact, in this election, I know many friends and family members who are from the upper class voting across many GRCs for opposition because many of us believe that it is the govt's job to protect the interest and welfare of all Singaporeans regardless of race, class, religion or income. Not all the rich are heartless, totally money minded people. Many of us have more common sense than the 60% of Singaporean.
      • Wilde 1 year 0 months ago
        I agree with ShortSingapore. Do not assume that everyone who stays on a landed property or condo is super-rich. Many condo dwellers are in fact HDB upgraders. I know of many people who have voted for the opposition. Why? They do not have to worry about the Town Council not upgrading their lifts and estates, they are not influenced by the government growth dividend payout and they also share the same concerns about overcrowding, inflation, education, affordable healthcare, etc.
    • tan  •  1 year 0 months ago
      Vincent, you are a man of excellent character and heart. Pls continue to do what you believe in, Singapore needs more people like you
      • Foreigner 1 year 0 months ago
        With the PAP at one of its most vulnerable and weakest time in election history of Singapore, the opposition won only Aljunied and Hougang and PAP still get 60% of the popular votes, the opposition did very very badly in this election, and I am not sure why the opposition supporters are so happy and over joy. That is the different between Manchester United (MU) and Manchester City (City). Both from the same area, City is happy if they win only FA Cup this year.

        Opposition could have win more seats if they did not go into the anti-immigration anti foreigners rhetoric together with their hatred mongers supporters. So so many Singaporeans accentors are immigrants to Singapore, so so many of Singaporeans themselves are also immigrants, or part of their family members are immigrants, from the very young to the very old, from the very newly arrival to the arrival long long time ago in the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s. And many many Singaporeans still remember how they are being targeted as “not welcome” in the early turbulence formation days of Singapore (and Malaysia). My young Singaporeans colleagues are turned off by this type of rhetoric, my Singaporeans relatives who are born in Singapore more than 50-60 years ago are turned off by this type of rhetoric, even the cleaning aunty of my office is turn off by this type of rhetoric.

        By targeting foreigners without any good suggestion, the only suggestion I heard from opposition parties and their hatred mongers supporters are to send foreigners home. No positive suggestion and pressure to build better infrastructure or do something positive (which goal getter Singaporeans will do), instead every day just hear opposition talking about foreigners go home, give foreigners less, foreigners this, foreigners that. This only shows to many Singaporeans the opposition parties have no brain, no idea and worst acted more like hooligans party. Even the Chen fellow in the WP Aljunied team who himself is a FT in foreign countries for so long and his parents used to be foreigners did not say anything concrete about foreigners, how disgraceful. Next time I bump into him in Hong Kong, Shanghai or Beijing, I will remind him please go back to Singapore, especially now he is an MP.

        Some Singaporeans after years of good life under PAP have lost that drive to succeed with good thinking and hard work, those that lost it include some of those in PAP. A little bit of crowd or jam or competition they cannot take it. It is time for PAP to repent and reflect, it is even more important for the opposition parties and their hatred mongers supporters to repent and reflect as a well.
      • tan 1 year 0 months ago
        No one discriminated outright against foreigners in this election. No one attributed high cost of living to foreigners as well. Show me just one instance if you could. I bet you only relied on national media and did not attend or listened to any of the rally speeches.

        Not everyone is only concerned with money as your narrow mind believes. People like VW, CSM, TJS, AYG, and many others are already well established in their career and need not enter politics and certainly not as oppositions to invite undue criticisms. But I believe they are doing so to give a voice to those who are struggling in current Singaporean society.

        Think of this group as the kid who finishes last in class. There are two perspectives one can take. First, you can dismiss this kid as being lazy and stupid and give up on him. The other view is to believe in the dignity and intrinsic value of life and listen to what this kid has to say and try to support him. My observation tells me that the PAP and its supporters chose to take the former view by placing all blames on the kid for finishing last.

        I'm not exonerating this kid of all faults but to me, every kid or every Singaporean who falls behind is still precious. If I see a fallen comrade, I want to pick him up and make sure he can stand up and race again before I continue on my own marathon. This is the difference between a compassionate society and the uncaring one you are advocating. An uncaring society is built on weak structures and I am absolutely certain that such a society cannot withstand shocks and will crumple at the first instance of trouble.
      • RespectSG 1 year 0 months ago
        @Foreigner,
        Singaporeans have been gracious and friendly towards foreigners but we certainly do not welcome yet another arrogant foreigner who has no respect for us and thinks he/she has the right to criticise every Singaporeans or ask our elected SG MP to go back. Why dont you go back and keep your mouth shut ! what's wrong with us trying to encourage our fellow Singaporeans in their fight for a better Singapore?
    • Darkest Knight  •  1 year 0 months ago
      dr vincent, do not despaiir. u lost to a minister who wasted more than $300 million without the blink of an eye. u lost not because your team was weak or your ideas were no good. u lost because it was a wrong GRC to fight in.

      in this rich man's GRC, why will they want to pick the opposition when PAP has been taxing them at such a low rate? by keeping prices high, these people have managed to make tons of profits from the sale of their properties. these people do not care abt the gd u can bring to the parliament. they only care abt how many more millions they can put in the bank!

      u fought very well. to me, the people of holland-bt timah are nobody compared to the heroes in Aljunied. the latter were not happy with PAP policies over the last 5 yrs and proceeded to vote bravely.

      rich men will always be the enemy of opposition. take note of that and choose the right ground to walk for the next 5 yrs, because it's not the end of your political career. this only marks its beginning.
      • Justice 1 year 0 months ago
        true to a certain extent. many rich people are selfish when it comes to policy making.
        they only look after their own personal interest. we have an elite group within the rich people mind u.... our ministers! congratulations to them to see continuation of their million dollar paychecks. obama, along with presidents and prime ministers of top economies must be super envious of what we pay our ministers. They probably drool at the thought of it. haha. hooray to the people of Singapore that we have made it top in another item :)
      • Peter Khoo 1 year 0 months ago
        Well said! SDP should combine with NSP or WP and start working the grounds of Tampines GRC, East Coast GRC and Marine Parade GRC, the grounds are sweet, fruits ripe for your pick, it will be a foregone conclusion by the next election if PAP continues to be arrogant and ignores the common people. Keep it up, members of the opposition. You've have brightened our lives, you've succeeded well in this elections, and most important of all, you've made the PAP eat humble pie! I sincerely hope you can continue to pursue the worries over costly public housing, healthcare and influx of FTs and not forgetting to get VB to account for the YOG fiasco. Thank you once again.
      • speekupsilenomo 1 year 0 months ago
        I am sad for my country..to think that TPL will be an MP .....Instead of the brave, intelligent & sincere characters like Dr Vincent/ Ms Nicole Seah or Mr Chiam ( or might I even add George Yeo to this group).

        The GRC system is not serving this country & it's people any good, only to PAP as a SCHEME to keep it in power.

        Many would agree that those who voted for the ruling party , did it out of fear & selfish short term gains rather than the long term good for the country.
    • Transparent  •  1 year 0 months ago
      SDP, SPP, WP should merge together. Then, the Opposition will become strong and have a louder voice for the people. Then, no one can break you easily. Unity is Strength.
      • Viva Singapore 1 year 0 months ago
        WP appears to be the strongest of the opposition, my thoughts are as follows:

        1) Singapore is so small no need so many parties. Too many indian chief.
        2) That Crediable Opposition should pull their resources and join ranks with WP. I mean only the credible ones and not the one who lost their deposits.
        3) With this like the US, we will have 2 credible parties with pools of talents sources and a join numbers where it will become stronger as in the opposition clause.
        4) As a Singaporean we would like to see our mother land prosper and the citizens prosper as well. So I hope more care and concern will be shown to our ageds, under-privillege families and especially the childrens.
        5) As the writer say many talents will flock to join the WP and it floated in my mind to do that because I love my country.
        6) In Korea, they have a program when the homeless, poor and elderly can have a meal at community centres and bathing facilities and free water fountain and these poor people can use once a day without questions. I hope we can adapt such kind of facilities with volunteers from the community serving them. (Rich serving the poor). This will be a caring and loving society.

        many more is in my heart as I look at our loving country and where we are heading to.

        My congratulations to WP’s Mr Low and his team I wish you the best and for the ruling parties congratulations too but please have a heart for Singapore Orang Aslie (Original Singaporean).
      • Jin Siew 1 year 0 months ago
        Yes......yes.....yes.......Opposition parties should not only sink, but bury, their differences, and get the NSP also into the fold. That would form a formidable talent pool from which you can form a shadow cabinet on the side line ready to take over should things go wrong. That`s the way towards a First World Parliament.
        MAJULLAH SINGAPURA!!!!!!
      • Visionary 1 year 0 months ago
        Unlikely simce Mr Chiam was removed from SDP some years ago
    • Ah Kow  •  1 year 0 months ago
      Dear Vincent, It's difficult to find the right words to console you and your team. There are too many Singaporeans who can only see the short term, falling into the trap laid by the PAP. They are living in PAP's fantasy world in spite of their own plight and circumstances. The rich are afraid also. It takes time to rebuild a party and image. I hope the SDP continues the process so that you will be more visible in the next election. To the SDP's Holland-Bt Timah GRC team, please don't give up, the road is paved with obstacles and booby traps but victory will be much sweeter when you get there. We love you.
    • P-Eye  •  1 year 0 months ago
      In my view SDP is on the right track but still not enough to win. Shedding their past "shadow" was a strong step forward. They should use GE 2011 to continue building a strong and indelible brand like WP.

      I think their arguments still resonates with a lot of Singaporeans and they should continue building the ground towards GE 2016.
    • Criticise  •  1 year 0 months ago
      Since 2006 till this day in 2011, we see a dramatic metamorphosis of SDP. It was once dismissed as a ragtag band of radicals led by Dr Chee and was villainised in mainstream media for being a radical party. But fast forward to today, it has changed its image, so much so that it managed to recruit more good people into its rank and file: Mr Tan Jee Say, Dr Ang Yong Guan, Dr Vincent Wijeysingha, Dr James Gomez and it had won the support from highly-qualified professionals such as Prof. Tambyah to lend support for SDP's healthcare policies. Despite SDP's longstanding existence, it must still be said that such achievements since 2006 are considered a baby step towards transforming its image as a credible party, and SDP this time has made it despite not winning any wards contested.

      Dr Chee and folks, you all are heroes. You had changed the game the other way round. In the past, you folks were accused of using smear and character assassinations. But this time round, the role was reversed: it was the MIWs who are using smear and all that, including TNP's coverage of SDP's 'protest march' to discredit you. On the contrary, you folks in SDP stood firm and steadfast, refusing to be drawn into the same smear shop as MIWs. That's why, by all virtues, I personally agree wholeheartedly that SDP has indeed fought a principled fight, with integrity and for the just cause you had been championing. In that, despite your defeat, your defeat is glorious and honorable.

      Please continue to keep up the good work, and not waste the foundation you had created for yourselves this GE. There're still much work to do. Please continue your outreach and if possible, walk the ground to build up rapport so that you can win over more people's heart with your sincerity. Also, take this 5-year hiatus as an opportunity to evaluate your electoral strate----, and also, recruit more heavyweights and maintain and expand your A-team formations. The key word here is continuity and sustainability. Don't be criticised by people for 'disappearing' after the elections. The work has only started since nomination day, and it has not ended yet. This is forever a work in progress.

      As amateurish my above suggestions are, I hope they can be useful because they come from my own observation as a third-party in this election using a citizens' perspective. I'm sure SDP is capable of rejuvenating itself further and by 2016, will emerge as a stronger party which is credible. Like the Energizer battery commercial: never say die!
    • NuWorldSlave  •  1 year 0 months ago
      Its amusing ppl are so attached to symbols. PAP, WP, SDP etc these are symbols.
      Many brand CSJ as a nutjob cos the media says so.
      But he has the guts to go against the system to fight for a cause. Its not like as if he committed genocide or embezzled public funds.
      Even if his methods are outlandish, he deserves more respect than the MPs who get paid millions to "miscalculate" on simple accounting.
      It's a pity cos someone like Dr Vincent in Parliament would definitely wake some sleepy MPs up from their slumber.
      • Chris Fh 1 year 0 months ago
        CSJ wasn't a nut job, it was just traditional media's potrayal of him.

        Even in this election they accused CSJ of wanting to walk after the rally having to be stopped by his party, which was not true at all.

        Singapore traditional media is untrustworthy. I stopped reading/believing whatever the dogs of SPH write about Singapore a long time ago.
      • Loo 1 year 0 months ago
        60% of Singaporeans had the guts to vote for whom they believe can govern Singapore better.

        60% are the quiet majority who do not live for the thumbs up
    • sarbesh  •  1 year 0 months ago
      Well done vincent. Do not give up. wE are stil behind you.
    • ERajoo  •  1 year 0 months ago
      My heartiest congratulations to the SDP. I am very proud of you. You have returned from the brink of defeat and garnered the support of 36.8 percent of Singaporeans. It is a remarkable feat for a party that was almost written off. Please keep you faith and return to represent us again.
      Well close to 39.9 percent of us Singaporeans have registered our dissent for the ruling party. That percentage is set to grow when the citizens struggle with the challenges of daily life in the island.
      Singaporeans will rise again to question these realities: rising healthcare, stressed school curriculum, rote educational practices. Ever increasing transport costs and overcrowded buses and trains. Declining job opportunities and depressed wages for the lower income groups. Foreigners preferred over citizens for jobs in many sectors.

      Our electorate is maturing, the shackles and blinkers that bound and blinded them are breaking and dropping. People will become more aware and take the brave step towards change. Be patient, 52 years of learned fear and earned insecurity will take some time to be de-conditioned. Singaporeans will recover to become their own persons and make informed decisions. Yes, the self-serving will always be with us, the blind may never see and others may doubt they can carry on without the familiar comforts, but enough of us have also stood up to voice our stand. At this time, this is sufficient, the next time, we will make clear inroads.

      We have told the PAP that we are not pleased, if the party disregards the concerns of the ground, it will be held accountable in five years time. Once again, we will question the tax-exempt million dollar salaries and life time pensions for the leaders of the ruling party. How is it that other men and women with similar if not better talent and training are willing to work for less to serve the people with rectitude and sincerity and resist the temptations of mammon while others from the PAP demand an exorbitant price from the taxpayers?

      This is our country. This is our nation that existed before us and will exist after us, so let's look to a better future. We retreat not in defeat or failure, we will retreat to rethink and recover what is ours to cherish and love. This is a promise we owe to our children and their future. Let's move forward Singapore, let's look to a new dawn. We the people of this island will return once again to decide on this mandate in 2016.
    • Jeff  •  1 year 0 months ago
      To the SDP Team, you guys had done a good job. Rome was not built in a day. WE will continue to support you.
    • Lizzzy  •  1 year 0 months ago
      I STILL WANT YOU & YOUR TEAM ON THE NEXT ELECTION! DON'T GIVE UP! WE WANT YOU!
    • anoldsingaporean  •  1 year 0 months ago
      This is my personal analysis of Singaprean voters:
      1. Diehard PAP supporters- about 30%-40% of them, do not attend rally, read only local newspapers, not fully aware of the mistakes or policies deemed against national interest or pro Foreigners, believe strongly in "Dont rock the foundation" and "only PAP can deliver" cos PAP controls all the money eg estate upgrading etc.
      2. The Extremely Careful - about 10%-20% of them, may attend some rally, rely mainly on local newspapers and own social network for news, have some knowledge about mistakes or policies deemed against national interest or pro Foreigners, also believe in "Dont rock the foundation" and "only PAP can deliver " as they control over all the state funds and have track records, but willing to give opposition a chance only if very strong candidates are offered under a party which they think have some track records eg WP as LTK has been an elected MP
      3. The Neutral - about 10%-20% of them, attend rally, get news from both mainstream and social media, aware of the mistakes or policies deemed against national interest or pro Foreigners, but will vote for only candidates from parties which win their support eg WP or SPP because of LTK and CST
      4. The Active Citizen - about 10% to 20% of them, a growing number, attend all opp rallies, active in social media, strongly believe in “giving Alternative Voices”, “Check & Balances”, will vote for opposition candidates whom they think have “the abilities to be their voices”, eg Vincent of SDP, Tony Tan of NSP etc.
      5. Diehard Opposition supporters: about 10 % to 20% of them, attend all opp rallies, have been voting for opposition parties for many years, will vote for opposition parties regardless of the types of candidates they offered.
      The fear factor over if their vote is secret is diminishing..
    • bettero  •  1 year 0 months ago
      So the conclusion was right, rich people in Bukit Timah Holland dont care about wasting few hundred of millions or no money for the poor.

      The oppositions need to consolidate and be united and send the best team to contest the weakest links, this election shows all the weakest links are in the EAST where they all polled below 60%. I suggest this SDP A team go to the EAST where men have bigger balls.
    • Ng  •  1 year 0 months ago
      dear Vincent and the SDP - You have fought a good fight and Singaporeans have benefitted from the issues that you have brought up during the GE. Please do not give up - you are a credible team and party and singapore needs you. Best Wishes to you and the SDP.
    • Oppo Fish  •  1 year 0 months ago
      Vincent, Michelle, Tan JS and the rest, you guys were phenomenal, by far, hands down you were the better team. You not being in parliament, is a great loss to Singapore and Singaporeans. Big Thank You to all the elite, uncaring voters of Holland / Bukit Timah. Pls continue the fight SDP and you will only grow from strength to strength. We need you now, more than ever, with the incumbants having the 2/3 majority in parliament. LHL says that they will heed the plight of the middle incomers and be more compassionate from now onwards, what he meant was how he's gonna FIX us, come the next election. A Leopard will nvr change it's spot..haha
    • Yeow hwee Lim  •  1 year 0 months ago
      Vincent Wijey! In Papers your team lost out BUT in the HEARTs of your Supportors & a portion of Singaporeans your team WIN so don't get DESPAIRED. The efforts for the Times, the Troubles & Courages You & your team made will be REMEMBERED by all of us so KEEP IT UP!! As the saying goes - very Dog has it's so as Humans you guys will have yours too just be patient you've us to live together with till the next GE & so on ok!!!!!!
    • Tan  •  1 year 0 months ago
      My whole family in holland bukit timah voted for SDP and we are very disappointed with the results.

      Please dont be disheartened as we will continue to support and vote for you guys in the next election !
    • Justme  •  1 year 0 months ago
      I truely believed Dr Vincent and his team deserved to win. There are much better and the PAP team. In fact, they are much better than many other PAP candidates which include TPL, those BGs and those hand pick civil servants.
    • ah_lang78  •  1 year 0 months ago
      Vincent, Michell & Tan JS pls dun be disheartened for those voters tt did'nt vote you.

      Your team had fight well in the battle.

      Those voters tt did'nt vote you were blinds by their selffishness.

      Pls make a comeback in the GE 2016 for the sake of Singapore again.

      By the way, thanks for all your effort given to our Singaporean.

      加油! 加油! 加! 加! 加油.........!

    Featured Blog Posts

    Blog Authors / Profiles