Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

 

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    SingaporeScene

    ‘Inclusive Budget with focus on elderly laudable’

    Singapore's demographic profile is being drastically transformed. (AFP file photo)

    Creating an inclusive society has been a goal of the government for a while now. It is nothing new. "Ours must be an open and inclusive Singapore," the Prime Minister himself said in 2004 when he took office.

    For the most part, however, Singaporeans — especially the elderly who feel left behind in a fast-paced Singapore — have not seen such inclusiveness. On the contrary, and as the elections in May last year showed, Singaporeans felt alienated and unhappy about certain government policies which were perceived to pander to non-Singaporeans in our midst.

    There is little doubt that Budget 2012 is a direct response to this discontent on the ground. "Our mission is to build an inclusive society and a stronger Singapore," Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam, who is also Deputy Prime Minister, reiterated in his speech in Parliament on Friday.

    The measures announced by Tharman go some way in addressing several key areas of concerns for Singaporeans, as the ageing population mandates a restructuring of our economy. And as far as being inclusive is concerned, it is laudable to see that the government has gotten more serious about addressing the needs of the more vulnerable segments of our society — one of which is the elderly.

    A fast-ageing population is a concern for any society. For Singapore, the issue has been on the government's mind for some time now. In 20 years, the city state will have some 800,000 citizens who will be 65-and above. Addressing this will involve the re-invention of policies, and introducing practical solutions over a slew of issues — from housing to employment, from healthcare to community space, from the cost of living to retirement needs.

    The measures announced in the Budget seem to have taken a holistic view in addressing these, which is welcomed.

    Starting with the belief that the needs of more senior Singaporeans are best catered for through employment, the criteria by which firms can draw on government subsidies when hiring and retaining older workers have been enhanced under the Special Employment Credit (SEC) scheme.

    Among other measures which will benefit elder Singaporeans, the CPF contribution rates have been increased, tax relief for those 55 and above have been enhanced, and new housing subsidy schemes introduced, including a silver housing bonus of S$20,000 for those who downgrade to a smaller HDB flat. This is to unlock the value of their flats and to afford these senior citizens some financial security in their later years.

    Emphasis on healthcare

    Healthcare, which features at the top of many senior citizens' list of concerns, are also addressed in the Budget. "We want to help Singaporeans age with dignity and grace," Tharman said. "Our seniors aspire not just to live long, but to have fulfilling, active golden years."

    To achieve these ideals, Tharman announced a significant doubling of the healthcare budget to S$8 billion over the next five years. Singaporeans have been calling on the government to do more in this area and it is good to see the government responding to the calls.

    All patients in community hospitals, for example, will now be able to get aid from the government in paying their bills, more will qualify for subsidies for stays in nursing homes, day care and rehabilitation centres, and also for home-care services. There will be top-ups of Medisave, Medishield and Medifund this year, with older citizens receiving more.

    The Budget also looks into providing help in the practical problems faced by the elderly in their homes. To this, the government is introducing a new programme to set aside S$2,000 worth of elder-friendly modifications for families in their homes. This will benefit some 130,000 households. Families with seniors will bear not more than S$250 each, as government subsidies will cover the rest of it.

    Along with these physical infrastructural help, families with elderly folks who require a maid will now get S$120 from the government to hire one. This is on top of the $95 concession which families with seniors already currently receive.

    While all these measures are welcomed, and indeed the government should be commended for these, it is getting the message to those most in need which will be the challenge. It would be no good if such help schemes are not made known to the groups who would benefit from them. Thus, it is incumbent upon Members of Parliament, grassroots volunteers, non-governmental organisations, voluntary welfare organisations, the media and the public in general, to inform our senior citizens who may not be aware of these schemes.

    Creating an inclusive society, as Tharman said, is neither the government's role alone nor is it simply about "redistributing resources to help the poor."

    As far as the elderly are concerned, it is about how we, individual citizens, see them and how we treat them — in everyday interactions at the work place, at the coffeeshops, the markets, the nursing centres and indeed in our own homes.

    "An inclusive society will only blossom," Tharman said, "if we grow this spirit of responsibility and community."

    Andrew helms publichouse.sg as Editor-in-Chief. His writings have been reproduced in other publications, including the Australian Housing Journal in 2010. He was nominated by Yahoo! Singapore as one of Singapore's most influential media persons in 2011.

     

    48 comments

    • tax heaven  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      All the wayand about helping with healthcare costs.

      I went for phototherapy at National Skin Center and was shocked that they increased the price of a session by 50% over last year. This is an incredible increase albeit with so called subsidy from govt. 2 times a week for months each time brings costs to a high level.

      And the increase does not come with added service or improved equipment. Why are they so greedy? Already you can find brand new Porcshes, Mercedeces, and even Ferrari parked at the Doctors' parking lots. How much more do they need to be satisfied?
    • Sunset Singapore  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      The 60% voters have to thank the 40% voters, specially the hougang, and Aljunies voters. Without them, our elderly will continue to suffer.
      • green lantern 3 months ago
        IF it was a clean sweep by PAP, don't ever dream of seeing this miserable change.
      • Zhou 3 months ago
        trust me, those 60% will still be as ignorance as ever they are.
        the coming GE2016 , is the testament on my claim here.
      • a citizen of Singapore 3 months ago
        each time when I set foot in Houngang & Aljunied,I always find chance to thank the people there.Once again,Thank-you te Aljunian & Houngian.
    • Tommyz  •  3 months ago
      Why is it the elderly are suffering in the FIRST Place, when PAP has all our resources at its disposal ? the CPF increase in CPF contribution will only make old people lose their jobs, because companies will hire CHEAP foreigners (NO CPF), Minimum wage we need!
      • E 3 months ago
        most over 50 or even early 40s are unemployed now. how .you increase cpf contribution?
      • Mohammed Noor 3 months ago
        Spot on. The PAPpies can carry on with such policies as we, in the 40% group, are gonna keep voting against them.
    • ho  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      Old man lee, MBT ask you go jb stay there in old age home
      • E 3 months ago
        die better..
      • Mohammed Noor 3 months ago
        Akan datang; very soon.
      • Alain 3 months ago
        @ho, it is not MBT, it is KBW during this time of Minister of healthcare, pls check your fact.
    • Risky Low  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      Just return us our CPF at 55. A lot of problems can be solved.
    • Fu Qiang  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      How about extending the Depending Insurance for all Singapore Citizens.
      If the average age have already extended to 85.
      This is also part of careing for the Elderly & aftercare.
      Thks

      Concern Citizen
    • Lim  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      More Goodie to come if the margin is 55% & 45%
      • Mohammed Noor 3 months ago
        We are not going to give them any more chances.
    • green lantern  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      Creating an inclusive society has been a goal of the government for a while now. It is nothing new. "Ours must be an open and inclusive Singapore," the Prime Minister himself said in 2004 when he took office.
      It has been about 8 years since 2004.
      Said one thing, did another thing.
      Now try very hard to do something to wayang to the people.
    • ask why  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      I visited nuh and went through so many checks paying from pocket for the past two years..my medisave saved for my funeral..
    • Sponge Bob  •  3 months ago
      The only elderly that are ripping all the riches and benefits are our dear PAP and senior civil servants and they dont have to worry or give a damn hoot about their CPF monies since they will be getting a big payout when they retire. For me, I will have nothing.
    • retro  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      I don't see any long term planning here. Looks like short term getting shorter by the day.
      Public money use for Bus upgrading, Smrt, Scoot, Investments, etc...etc.......
      Lost is ours and Profit....... not ours. We get budgeted. The GDP will always work towards YOUR SALARY increase. NEVER FAILS. Look for Void Decks for Elder Care or better, Malaysia. DOES THIS SOUND,"INCLUSIVE."
      • Pay A Pig 3 months ago
        "Public money use for Bus upgrading, Smrt"
        hahahahaaaa... did u remember they use "fleet upgrade" as part of reason the reason for the last fare increase?
      • Nc 3 months ago
        "INCLUSIVE." - to pay more.
    • DarkMax  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      If they are concerned with our elderly, they really should allow the old folks the right and the option to completely withdraw their life savings trapped in the CPF. But that again is a drain on their income and the money used in our sovereign funds.
    • green lantern  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      a silver housing bonus of S$20,000 for those who downgrade to a smaller HDB flat.
      so 4-room HDB flat downgrade to 3-room HDB flat
      3-room HDB flat downgrade to ???
      to rental housing?
      if private rental is $500, the $20,000 can only last you 20,000/500/12 = 3.3 years
      did PAP Mah Bow Tan build enough affordable rental flats?
      NO.
      in spite of the millions dollars pension he now enjoys, how come he failed to plan and build?
      should CEO of HDB be sacked too?
    • Noene Lakahee  •  3 months ago
      After so many decades under their Money & Commerce-centric governance, whatever they now dishes out in a 'Budget', remains to be seen - as it has often REMAINED to be seen materialized. I declare a Vote of No Confidence.
    • green lantern  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      Creating an inclusive society, as Tharman said, is neither the government's role alone nor is it simply about "redistributing resources to help the poor."
      As usual, PAP again wants to tai-ji away as much as they can and give out as little as they can.
    • sandwiched citizen  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      When it was stated "all patients", please give priority to CITIZENS, not the PRs and FW/FT.
      I was labelled as anti-foreigner and trying to stir up serious social problems when I highlighted that Pink ICs should be given priority over Blue ICs if handouts/subsidies are from the government. Note that I did not say omit the PRs, just prioritize the CITIZENS.
    • rangerboi  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      At the end of the day, we need to ask whether the amount would be 100% fixed or will it be subject to changes due to diff families coping differently from the rising costs. One the Healthcare end in particular, I'm wondering if the mentally ill are included as well since unlike the rest, it's pretty much of a taboo issue undisclosed, yet continually stigmatized in the society just like AIDS.
    • teo  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  3 months ago
      tap ur reserved for old ppl in singapore, subsidy their medisave more, NOT TO ASK THEM TO CONTRIBUTE MORE....their just earn few hundreds NO LIKE U millions.....ALL OLD SINGAPOREAN SUFFER if this scheme started ...lesser the take home pay.
    • VisVis  •  3 months ago
      The Govt knows every seniors have ltos of medisave n they are trying to take it away n implementing lots of schemes to suck them dry.
    • GET REAL.  •  3 months ago
      True - DPM Minister Tharman did an excellent job addressing the elderlies with this year's budget, however we will have to see how it is delivered by MOH Minister Gan Kim Yong. On a number of occasions, announcements were made but a "strip-tease show" begins thereafter with hidden booby traps akin obstacles like the approval to use our Medisave for certain illnesses capped at $400 but with a lot of restrictions and protocol and even admin charges. So let see over the next fortnight what MOH comes out with. Hopefully there will be clear definations spelt out and not rude shocks when needed.

    Featured Blog Posts

    Blog Authors / Profiles