Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

 

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    SingaporeScene

    Tan Kin Lian confirms Presidential bid

    Tan Kin Lian announces he will be running for President in the upcoming polls. (AFP photo)Tan Kin Lian announces he will be running for President in the upcoming polls. (AFP photo)Former NTUC Income chief Tan Kin Lian has thrown his name into the hat for the post of President of Singapore.

    In a short message on his blog on Tuesday, Tan said, "I have now decided to contest the Presidential Election (if I am given the Certificate of Eligibility)."

    He will issue a full statement later on Tuesday.

    Tan, 63, first announced his interest in contesting the Presidential polls, due by 31 Aug, last Friday after his friend collected the Certificate of Eligibility forms on his behalf.

    He was then undecided then as his wife, fearing a "possible smear campaign" had initial reservations about his participation. He also mentioned the fact that he also came from a humble background, and as such, was not sure he could fit the "ceremonial and diplomatic role of the Presidency."

    However, in his blog post entitled "Safeguarding the reserves" on Tuesday, Tan appeared more determined and said he had taken note of two main concerns that Singaporeans shared via Internet postings regarding the post of President.

    One was whether their money in the Central Provident Fund is safe, and whether the government is able to make payouts at the withdrawal dates.

    The other was whether Singapore has enough reserves to protect its economic security in the challenging global financial environment.

    He noted these concerns were worsened by the decline in trust in the government in recent years and a lack of transparency on the reserves.

    To improve transparency and assure people, Tan suggested the Elected President's office produce an annual report on Singapore's reserves, with the financial assets of relevant organisations stated at its book values and market value.

    "It is important to avoid focus on the market value as it is highly volatile and is not appropriate for long term investments," he noted.

    Tan Kian Lian confirms his bid on his blog. (Screencap)Tan Kian Lian confirms his bid on his blog. (Screencap)

    The annual report should show the obligation of the government and include people's balance held in the Central Provident Fund as well as the bonds and guarantees issued by the government.

    Physical assets such as military hardware and infrastructure may be excluded from the annual report so long as there are adequate measures to ensure these items can be properly accounted for, said Tan, citing the need to preserve national secrets and the practical difficulty in listing the items.

    "Some people may worry that it will be quite a challenge to produce this annual report. This is not the case, as it is what multi-national corporations have to do now," he said.

    "I believe that the publication of this annual report would improve transparency and give the assurance to the people of their financial security. The reserves held by the Singapore Government are among the highest in the world on a per-capita basis. There is really no need for the people to be concerned," he added.

    Tan also said, he would prefer Singapore's two sovereign wealth funds (Government of Singapore Investment Corporation and Temasek Holdings) to adopt a "conservative approach", by avoiding speculation on market timing and asset selection, when investing assets.

    Stanley Yang, a fan of Yahoo! Singapore's Facebook page welcomed Mr Tan's decision to run for President.

    He wrote, "Men-on-street, NTUC, middle ground, opposition supporters, PAP supporters, sandwiched class all can relate well with TKL. This is excellent news."

    Mr Tan joins Dr Tan Cheng Bock, a former PAP member and Ayer Rajah MP, in officially confirming his bid to run as a candidate for the President's post.

    An independent panel still has to decide if the duo meet the strict criteria required to become an official Presidential candidate.

    Among the criteria is candidates must have served for at least three years in a senior leadership role in government or chief of a company with a paid-up capital of at least S$100 million.

    If both candidates are eligible to stand, it will only be the second time a Presidential Election is contested since 1993.

    Former Foreign Minister George Yeo has also said he's mulling over a Presidential bid. He said on Monday he will announce his decision in a fortnight. 


    Follow Yahoo! News on Twitter and become a fan on Facebook.

     

    341 comments

    • Rocky  •  11 months ago
      LKY is the senior adviser to the GIC!
      ESM Goh controls MAS!
      Ah Loong is the head of Govt and Chairman of GIC!
      Ho Ching controls Temasek!
      What is left for Sporeans??
      The elected president is the custodian of the nation’s reserves!
      It is time that we elect a president who is not related to the Lees and outside the PAP Camp!
      • low 11 months ago
        It would be horrendous to have a opposition as President. Crazy idea unless you are out to destroy Singapore.
      • 丰光 11 months ago
        Jade
        where is your logic?
        please explain?
        you mean to say that oppositions are out to destroy our country?
        or that they are only good at destruction?
      • pua 11 months ago
        Hi fellow singaporean,
        Do not waste your time and ener----, it would be wiser to reserve those mentioned for your work and family.
        Look at the terms and conditions needed to fulfill for the post of president.
    • Simon B  •  11 months ago
      Great. Now we know that there will definitely be a contest. Whether ---- will be the 3rd candidate or not, we will also know soon.

      I propose all EP candidates formalise their action plans and proposals on how they want to perform their duties if selected. This will give the electorate a complete understanding and vote for the EP with their eyes open. This will also ensure a transparent system of governance as far as the EP is concerned.

      I also wonder whether PAP will come up with their own endorsed candidate. Would he be ----? Maybe even Nathan? Maybe Ho Ching??
      • TAXI-UNCLE 11 months ago
        "Would he be ... " are you refering to LKY? Either one of them, we all die fast, fast.
      • Monk 11 months ago
        Nathan or Ho Ching!! You must be joking.
      • Liu Tuk Me 11 months ago
        TKL has my vote.

        1. president's salary -> charity, set precedent for future presidents
        2. check on reserves + transparency

        These are the most important issues we care about.
    • AT  •  11 months ago
      A Point in Time- It would be good if...

      "Singapore can get a wise, independent and Free (i.e. Zero Pay) EP".

      I.e. EP is a holy voluntary Hobby, instead of Highly paid Job..
    • Just my 2 cents worth  •  11 months ago
      I would like to see the elected president to do more than just protecting national reserves and performing ceremonial roles.

      He should have "meet the citizens" sessions to hear out what are their issues and concerns.
      He should have a yearly "President meet parliament" session to get them to address burning issues raised by the citizens which the ruling party have not addressed or treated as "noises".
      He should have the authority to pardon a person from death penalty.
      He should unite the nation.
      He should have the right to discipline anyone who tries to divide or destroy the country thru defamatory blogs, politics etc

      If he is just a figure head to perform ceremonial role and guard national reserve, in my opinion, this election is not needed.

      Mr Tan - can you do more other than donating part of your salary to charity?
      • Rocky 11 months ago
        The rules of the game is worked out by PAP! What the president can do outside the box??
      • thedo9thinker 11 months ago
        Can't See, Can't Hear, & Can't Talk!!! = Sleeping!
        'Belfast'
      • Gen Y2 11 months ago
        No sitting Presidents could say No to LHL govt if they want to spend the reserves or appoint any cronies to sit on GIC........ they cannot even do this one simple thin---- and you want them to do more??.....
    • NV  •  11 months ago
      Why not replace the position of President with a presidential panel or council which we already have but tweat it to comprise of say 5 distinguished or honest citizen of good standing to collectively guard and protect the assets and reserve of Singapore? The panel will have specific functions and duties to be prescribed by the Constitution. Every year one of the panel member will be appointed to assume the role of President through voting among themselves (like the Vatican selecting a Pope). Each will receive a modest annual salary of say $200,000 with the appointed President getting abit more, maybe $250,000. This way we the taxpayer only spend $1.25 million per year for the price of 5 wise men and still have a President packed in to perform the role of head of State, which is only visible ceremonially. We save at least $3 millions a year!!! Since all the wise men in the panel are likely to be elderly and old, there is no worry of anyone konking off in the context of a 5-man panel. Even if the one konks off is the President, the panel will just simply ask the vice or deputy to step into the P role, and after all the State funeral ceremonies are over, another prominent and public spirited member can be appointed to replace the konked off member so that the presidential panel will again have a quoram of 5. Such an arrangement should be enough to cater to our needs in tiny Singapore and save face for a ceremonial President mostly in name but not doing much for 5 years and everyday incurring the curse and wrath of Singaporeans. This way we have the cake and eat it....win-win for everybody.
      • Eng 11 months ago
        Beautiful! How to put your brilliant ideas into action? I am sure you know how since you can think of such an alternative. Start doing the road map please and I am sure we S'poreans will thank you for it. Cheers.
      • NV 11 months ago
        Thank you Eng. As you know, we are all posting our views and ideas as concerned citizens with vested interests in what goes on in our country, especially on a matter as important as the elected presidency. Translating an idea into workable solution is a different story. Our ideas are raw and only broad frameworks. We are not in Government and unless someone up there agrees with it and have the gumption to do something, all that we say are likely to stay where it is and collect dusts. Actually, if the PM and his MIW really want to change the system, all he needs to do is to form a committee to look into it and present what is known as a ‘while paper’. Assuming the idea is finally accepted and a bill is passed for it to be implemented, there should then be an election for people to choose the 5-man (or woman) PC. The criteria to stand for election to be a member of the PC should be lowered but not to the extent as to attract clowns and so on. We all want as many qualified people as possible to come forward, people with integrity and honesty of course. All Singaporeans eligible to vote will then choose from a list of candidates on a National basis, the five most suitable to be elected to form the PC. Each of these five elected will then take turn to be the EP on a yearly evolving basis. Such a system will throw the net wide open and attracts a wider range of candidates from a broader cross-section of our society. A PC will collectively have veto power on a range of major issues and policies (besides safeguarding the reserves) that threaten the lives of Singaporeans in a perilous way (raising the retirement age in the CPF, raising the price of HDB flats beyond a certain %, allowing too many FTs into Singapore displacing jobs and taking away the livelihood of Singaporeans, etc). A 5-man PC will have more clout and moral power to go against the Government when circumstances dictate. It also won’t be so easy for the Government to influence or control a 5-man PC as opposed to one EP. Only then we can maybe say there is a separation of powers and our PCand its EP is truly non-partisan. All these changes will of course have to be reflected in the Constitution by way of constitutional amendments through bills passed in Parliament. Sorry if my reply is so lengthy.
      • Tan Ah Teck 11 months ago
        you are good newvoice...well said.
    • Fairness  •  11 months ago
      How much has Nathan made during his 2 terms of presidency? Millions!

      What has Nathan achieved during these 2 terms of presidency? Nothing noteworthy!

      Why is the coming PE especially important? We don't want another Nathan for president.
      • TEAR DROPS 11 months ago
        @ Fairness, What has Nathan achieved during these 2 terms of presidency?
        Yes he had achieve some thing that not much people achieve. Million Million of $$$$$ for his generation to be miliiion aass.
      • Alamak 11 months ago
        Very nicely stated.
      • Liu Tuk Me 11 months ago
        we have a president? how come i don't know? what has he done for us?
    • andy  •  11 months ago
      Although the President has no official power, i would still like to see the president do his bid to check out the government. The role of the government is take care of SINGAPOREANS and not FTs or Singapore Resident. Regardless whether it is the reserves accumulated by SINGAPOREANS or the well being (jobs with good prospects, health benefits) of SINGAPOREANS, the president must let the government know if they are deviating from their roles. Rather than just accepting the policies, learn to question them and bring it to the table. Whats the point of being a public figure when you are just going to shun away from debates?
    • 131kCPF hold  •  11 months ago
      One was whether their money in the Central Provident Fund is safe, and whether the government is able to make payouts at the withdrawal dates.
      The other was whether Singapore has enough reserves to protect its economic security in the challenging global financial environment.
      All are PA man,But if you say and do what you say above, Count my vote to you.
      Return our CPF the soonest the possible when we reach 55. Scrap the Minimum sum.
    • Amelia  •  11 months ago
      Good to have someone to scrutinize the MIW.
      Just don't want a flip flop president and a first lady who warns citizens that whoever wants to get near her tiger will have to go through her !
    • T A Balasingam  •  11 months ago
      To Tie-Break:

      It is not for you to decide who will be the Executive President. It will be decided at the ballot box after all the Singaporean voters have voted on Voting Day.

      Articulate your reasons here respectfully and factually. We will listen to you but we will decide individually who gets our vote to be the Executive President.
    • HXP347  •  11 months ago
      All the candidates should stand up and debate on national TV and then we will be able to decide who is the best candidate for this important role.
    • lk  •  11 months ago
      As for George Yeo, his heart seems that he wants to be president but outwardly he pretends to say he does not want it. If he files in to run for President, he is bound for trouble. Being so arrogant together with Lim Hwee Hua who were kicked out of Aljunied GRC, how can he be President ! My foot ?

      Tan Cheng Bock is a better person. When he was MP, he did the best for the citizen by asking the Govt to let the people have free parking on Sundays and Holidays so that people can have more bonding with their relative and now that he no longer MP the HDB/URA is trying to remove the free car parks on Sundays and Holidays
    • Wake Up  •  11 months ago
      TKL, you will have my support if as what you say and promise:
      1. Donate a substantial portion of your salary to help the needy, I will say reasonable 60%.
      2. Check and review our country Resevers, provide detail information on the current Reserves
      and you must be responsible to check the govt. to obtain a fair and reasonable answer
      from the govt. as to why the govt need to utilised the Reserves. The govt should not be
      allowed to use our Reservces as a political carrot during GE.
      3. To review our CPF money are adequately protected.
      4. To have an Y/E report as promised by you.
      5. To look into the welfare of Senior Citizens and to restore Senior Citizens transport fare discount
      back to the original maximum fare charge of $0.73 cents for MRT.
      NB: Seniors was robbed off their fare discount when the Transport Minister introduce the
      Distant Base Fare. The orginal max fare of $0.73 was increased by 43.84% to $1.05 max
      If you dare to include this announce as your EP manifesto, you will definetly have Singaporeans
      support
    • Jiangjuajee  •  11 months ago
      Beware! George Yeo is now also seriously considering running for President. Why? This is to counter Tan Kin Lian. So remember, George is still a PAP man. PAP would rather have him than Tan Kin Lian.
    • YY tell me Y  •  11 months ago
      President must NOT be a YES man..... We all knew former president Ong Teng Cheong did his job well!....so guys vote wisely
    • NV  •  11 months ago
      While many are expressing their support for TCB, just as many are now rooting for TKL for the elected presidency. A significant few including myself are sceptical about the ability of any of them to do what they promise to do. This is because the function of the EP prescribed by the Constitution goes beyond that of just safeguarding the reserves or financial assets of Singapore. The EP is also expected to safeguard the integrity of the Public Services; Internal Security Act; Maintenance of Religious Harmony Act; CPIB investigations. Most of the postings focus mainly on the safeguarding of reserves, largely ignoring the rest of the functions for which the EP are expected to perform. Take the safeguarding of the integrity of the Public Services for instance. To safeguard the integrity of the Public Services, it means the EP must exercise his veto power against the appointments of key positions of the Civil Service or government companies or Statutory Boards if he believes any such appointment is not in the best interest of Singapore. Realistically, do you think any of the candidates vying for the position can or will carry out such a function without fear or favour...one man against the entire monolithic system to which he could well be beholden in the first place?? I think not. We need a system whereby a President is chosen from amongst his rank of elected presidential councillors (EPCs), and while he plays out his role in ceremonial situations as Head of State, he together with the rest of the EPCs will collectively be the custodians with veto powers to safeguard, among other things, the financial assets and reserves of Singapore. And perhaps more importantly not just to safeguard, but also to probe, question and investigate how the reserves are being invested and to subsequently report to the people of Singapore truthfully without fail. Only when we have such a system will it be meaningful to talk about elected presidency with real separation of powers.
    • siew  •  11 months ago
      To: Wanli

      Tan KL, did not campaign for presidencny election in the speaker corner. During the mini bond saga, he was there to speak up and help to fight for Singaporeans who lost $500 million in the mini bond, freely. He stand up for us for good cause, nothing else. It is because of this many Singaporeans ask him to stand for presidency. Most Singaporeans lost all their money but in Hong Hong, their investers got back at least 75%.

      Wanli, I think you owe Tan Kl an apolo----.

      Stop making wild allegations like a bunch of wild animals.
    • C  •  11 months ago
      The goodwill ---- received after the election will be gone if he does indeed throw his name into the hat. Many even myself kind of took pity on him after he lost. But I think he could be mistaking the goodwill as support. Don't expect the same feelings if he gets back into the race... It's not a anti PAP thing here but I belief many want a good independent man for the role and not another Yes man... TCB may be a former PAP man but he seems honest and straight forward. ---- disappear right after taking the forms? Can't even stick around to give us a straight forward answer then why bother to take the forms? I don't like those beating about the bushes people...
    • Loong Tham  •  11 months ago
      Actually I hope Nathan will run again.It'll be good to see him get humilated.
    • Loong Tham  •  11 months ago
      I've just decided to run for president.I'll just keep 200K and donate 4 mil to charities.Pls vote for me.Thank you.

    Featured Blog Posts

    Blog Authors / Profiles