YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Workers' Party calls for ministerial pay to be published annually

    A list of political salaries and national bonuses paid to leaders should be published yearly and subject to public scrutiny, said the Workers' Party (WP) Member of Parliament (MP) Yaw Shin Leong on Monday.

    Based on a video by Channel NewsAsia, Yaw explained in Parliament that this would be in line with the “clean wage” principle as advocated by the Ministerial Salary Review Committee.

    He laid out two other proposals by the WP, which aims to enhance the “twin towers of accountability and transparency” in paying political leaders. 

    Firstly, an independent commission should be formed each time the Prime Minister seeks to review the formula for ministerial salaries.

    Secondly, the findings of the independent commission should be subject to debate and approval in Parliament.

    “The principle of parliamentary sovereignty is of utmost importance. The report should be published to Parliament and thus to the public. Not first for the Prime Minister's eyes only and certainly not first to the ruling party's caucus,” he said.

    Meanwhile, the WP’s proposal for an alternative framework for ministerial salaries, which pegs ministerial pay to MPs’ allowance, came under fire in Parliament for being similar to the Committee’s reports.

    MP Vikram Nair from the ruling People's Action Party (PAP) pointed out that WP’s proposed salary for entry-level ministers would be higher than the committee's recommendation of S$46,750.

    That would make a difference of S$99,000, close to two months’ bonus under the proposed scheme.

    Minister for Foreign Affairs K Shanmugam also noted the similarity of the proposals in a Facebook post. “Looking at the Committee's Report, and the WP's proposals, there is not much difference. WP proposes that Ministers be paid between S$825k and S$935k. These amounts are well above the minimum that the Committee has proposed for Ministers - which is S$600k. And the average suggested by the Committee is at S$1.1m,” he wrote.

    According to Channel News Asia, Yaw responded by saying that the WP took issue with the use of the top 1,000 income earners as benchmarks.

    He said that the committee's recommended benchmark will result in an estimated 51-per-cent increase in the salaries by 2020, TODAY reported.

    According to TODAY, When Nair pointed out that the salaries proposed by the committee over the next five years will still be less than the Workers' Party's base salary, Yaw responded by saying that they should “look at the long-term horizon”.

    Yaw also added that ministerial pay would be lower according to the WP’s proposal as they would only receive a maximum of five months bonus, compared to 13.5 as recommended by the committee, TODAY reported.

    In addition, WP Non-constituency MP Yee Jenn Jong pointed out that while the WP’s proposal may seem similar to the review committee’s recommendations, it sends a clear signal that ministers are elected by the people as their pay is pegged to MPs.

    How do you feel about this article?

     
    • Jonn  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  4 months ago
      WP clearly has the formula correct even if it seems some ministers may be drawing more. The outrageous bonus of 13.5 months is gone. The ill-conceived and arbitrary pegging to Private Top 1000 wage earners, is also removed. The WP clearly has placed Singapore's interest first. Well done.
      • teo 4 months ago
        Well said. A lot of hidden pay were not told so it is not transparent. Please show every incomes and sources. Like what USA president Mr. Obama did. Very clear!
      • Danielle 4 months ago
        you're not reading the report and just reading that heading! you said well done that the WP proposed higher salary to incoming MP's where in the PAP proposed lower?! outrageous and just saying OK to everything WP is saying w/o even seeing and reading carefully!
      • TheGoodCitizen 4 months ago
        @Danielle "Nair pointed out that the salaries proposed by the committee over the next five years will still be less than the Workers' Party's base salary... Its only according to Nair... according to Nair... What's the point of looking only at salaries when bonus can reach 13.5 months as argued by Yaw in the next paragraph! I think it is YOU who did not read the report in its entirety.
    • wtf  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  4 months ago
      the world world is watching with laughter while we make a mockery of ourselves. the reason is singaporeans are v.unhappy with the way the ruling party having a free hand in deciding only by themselves, how much each minister should be paid. they have got away for the last 20 something years bcos it was not a contentious issue then. people were more concerned with education, getting over day to day issues to make ends meet. now, singaporeans are well educated, tech savvy and more knowlegable. we became a matured and developed society. with the huge influx of fts and fws widely promoted by the govt. over the years, it slowly dawned upon us that our very own survival in our backyards are threatened by these foreigners. they took our jobs with cheap labour in times of difficulty. singaporeans have to work till 70 to upkeep themselves as the govt do not believe in subsidies. when a family daily needs are insuffcient needs and when ministers are aloof and drawing million $ salaries, how do you expect the man on the ground to react. the blame obviously fell squarely on the govt. and the inner loop of ministers. now, they said they are listening. those days, it was all noise. let them hear the loudest noise ever, come ge2016.
      • Francis 4 months ago
        very true. we need more accountability and transparency. Otherwise, cant blame people from speculating.
      • Huat Ah 4 months ago
        @Wtf, yes, like the world is laughing at Myammar and North Korea... this sad state of affairs will bring us down beyond repair if we still do not wake up from our slumber
      • A Yahoo! User 4 months ago
        Like Joe Paterno, if you become overly confident and arrogant, with one serious mistakes, all the good work of your past legacy will be wiped out. You can die a broken man and be disregarded.
    • Singapore Our Home Our Co ...  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  4 months ago
      I totally agree that the Ministers' salaries including bonuses should be published annually if the Government claims that it is adopting a clean wage policy with no hidden perks. Ultimately their salaries are paid by our taxpayers' monies and we deserve to know what each Minister is getting. This is what transparency and accountability means.
      • Citizen Of Singapore 4 months ago
        You are right. Imagine before this debate was aired and published in , a lot of people were unaware that the previous MIWs salary package was really 'out of this world'!!
    • Commoner  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  4 months ago
      Look at all the PAP Ministers, most of them are from civil services, NTUC or GLCs before they join politics, they were certainly no where near the 1000 top earners, so please speak with facts, PAP
      • Kopi boy 4 months ago
        Fully agree with you. Last two GEs, PAP only manage to get candidates fm NTUC, Army or Civil Service. None of these are the top brains or top earners fm private sector. Shows that this whole arguement that you pay top salary to get top brains into politics does not work lasdt the last 10 years.
      • Kopi boy 4 months ago
        If you want truly transparent, also publish the ministers' last salary b4 they join politics
      • A Yahoo! User 4 months ago
        Declare the last income of each Minister and MP at the point of joining politics and government to prove they have made a sacrifice. I remember Ng Eng Hen was being paid about $200,000 when he came into politcs, not the super millions of Dr Susan Chan! You think your polity has forgotten? Check it out!
    • EastEndBoy  •  4 months ago
      If we want to be truly transparent, would the ministers and MPs declare their other incomes from being independent directors, board members, advisers etc, and their assets annually? Many countries, including Malaysia does this. These are all benefits which would not have been possible if they were not political appointment holders!
      • A Yahoo! User 4 months ago
        The Pappies has set a trap for themselves by declaring that the new salary review proposal is "cleaner" than other countries. LOL..now they better live up to their words be declaring all the benefits they have been receiving from directorships etc...I guess they should start declaring how many gift hampers or cans of abalone they have been receiving this coming CNY. Hahaha...
      • Francis 4 months ago
        also, the income of their spouses and scholarships given to ministers' children. Be transparent and get respect from voters.
    • A Yahoo! User  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  4 months ago
      Is our MP 100% working as MP or still earning from other sideline?
    • Chumm  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  4 months ago
      Spot on WP!

      There should be no secrecy about the pay! It should be published annually for all to know!
    • Commoner  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  4 months ago
      Do our young political office holders derserve their million dollar pay? Are Singaporean generally doing better compared to 10 years ago?
    • ZigZag  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  4 months ago
      Also must declare who is related to who in the cabinet, parliament, GLCs, lCs and civil service . I am not surprise if there re many related people in these places. There were already too many senseless appointment to some jobs, so I am not surprise. This will reveal how clean the government is, since they are the one that declare they want Clean wages. Go the second mile lor, it would be good, since it might help you look cleaner too. So, declare all related parties, relatives in those organisations !!
    • A Yahoo! User  •  4 months ago
      NCMP Yee has made a valid and very good point to substantiate WP's proposal, and that is, since ministers are elected as MP by their voters, their pay should be based on the MP's allowance and not on the 1,000 so called top earners. That, I say, is a very good reasoning to give, because before he can become a minister, a PAP candidate has first to be elected as a n MP. So why must his pay be based on the high income earners in the industries?
    • A Yahoo! User  •  4 months ago
      WP, you are getting more and more relevant to Singaporeans day by day. Well done ! This is the party that truly represents the ideals and aspirations of Singaporeans of today. The PAP MPs are showing their naive attitude by saying the WP's proposal is the same as that of the Review Committee. Although the figures arrived at may be about approximate to each other, the manner in which they are derived is totally different. Two persons may arrive at the same destination, one using vehicular transport and the other using leg power. Though they may arrive at the same location, their mode of travel is different. Obviously the PAP MPs in parliament are not trained accountants or having any inkling what auditing is all about. What they are saying is akin to saying a $1 balance in an account is the same for every account showing $1 balance, which is far from the truth. One account may show a deposit (credit) of $1 to show a balance of $1 at account closing. The other account may involve a deposit of $3 and a withdrawal of $2 to show a net balance of $1. Clearly they may both show a balance of $1, but they are not the same in transactional value. PAP MPs, and even a minister (Law) do not even understand the basic principle of values. How naive of them.
    • anonymous  •  4 months ago
      Vikram Nair couldn't even get his own facts right before jumping into the fray and has to be corrected by his boss. Is this the degree of quality that are taxpayers are expected to pay for?
    • sxxsss  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  4 months ago
      TO All Aljunied RESIDENTS,
      Thanks for voting in WP, Glad now we have voices in our Parliament and some form of democracy in this country. Kudos to 8 WP Mps and Lina Chiam too!
    • Shooter  •  Hanoi, Vietnam  •  4 months ago
      Yes ! We support it, We want to know the annual salary of PM, All Ministers & MPs.
    • Native Singaporeans  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  4 months ago
      Well done, WP. We neeed good national policies and monitoring system to be in place.

      The political salaries and national bonuses paid to leaders should be published yearly and subject to public scrutiny.

      We need the opposition MP-elected to perform the check and balance on PAP governhment as we lost hope on them.
    • Kristine  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  4 months ago
      When LHL talk rubbish, he get 10 fools to suport and rebroadcast.
      When Chen Shao Mao speaks, all netizen and the 40% voters support volunteery, because it make sense.
    • Rocky  •  Singapore, Central Singapore  •  4 months ago
      To be in line with the so call “clean wage”;
      PM and ministers to declare their assets and annual income,
      PM, ministers to declare other gainful employment such as chairman of GIC / board of directors and the perks.
    • Aaron  •  4 months ago
      Thus far, I am very pleased with WP's performance, not being a flaming talking speaker, doing appropriate thing at the right time, given deep thought and preparation over an issue of concern to all Singaporeans, work as a political party not self, prudent in not making rash or emotional response and act as the ruling party, PA, infiltrators, spies are all out to find fault with this ONLY HOPE for the 40% singaporeans in Aljunied and Hougang
      May I urge ALL singaporeans to give this humble, down to earth, determined party a chance to make significant inroad into Parliament so that Policies can be shaped for the betterment of future SIngapore? Thank you
    • Oops..  •  4 months ago
      Spot on. PM Lee, please see to it that it is done !
      Since you are so un-talented, do you need to appoint another committee to do it?
    • BrainDead  •  4 months ago
      If there is no difference between the WP's proposal and that of MSRC's, then, have the grace to accept the former's proposal. I believe you will score more political point by doing so. :-)

    Featured Blog Posts